Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T22:36:02.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further studies of the dynamics of nitrogen metabolism in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2008

J. V. Nolan ,
B. W. Norton  and
R. A. Leng
J. V. Nolan
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Faculty of Rural Science, The University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
B. W. Norton
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Faculty of Rural Science, The University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
R. A. Leng
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Faculty of Rural Science, The University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A study of ammonia and urea metabolism in sheep was made using isotope dilution techniques with (15NH4)2SO4, [15N]urea and [14C]urea in order to determine quantitatively the movements of urea-N and NH3-N throughout the body of normal, feeding sheep.

2. Single injections of 15N-labelled compounds were made into the rumen fluid NH3, caecal fluid NH3 and the blood urea pools, in order to estimate the rates of flux through, and the transfer of N between, these and other nitrogenous pools in the body. 51Cr EDTA was injected into the rumen and caecum with (15NH4)2SO4 to allow estimation of fluid volumes and to provide an indication of mixing, and of times of transit of isotopes between different sampling sites in the digestive tract.

3. The sheep ate approximately 22 g lucerne chaff/h and the mean dietary N intake was 16.3 g/d.

4. The rate of flux of NH3 through the rumen NH3 pool was 15.0 g/d (i.e. 90% of the dietary N ingested; however, this amount also included N from plasma urea (1.1 g/d) and other endogenous sources including NH3 derived from caecal NH3 (0.4 g/d).

5. Only 40% of the N in isolated rumen bacteria was derived from NH3, indicating that a considerable proportion of their N requirements were obtained from compounds other than NH3 (e.g. peptides and amino acids).

6. There was evidence of recycling of N between nitrogenous pools in the rumen, probably through rumen NH3 → microbial N → NH3.

7. It was estimated that 5.3 g blood urea-N/d entered the digestive tract: 20% of this urea was degraded in the rumen, 25% in the caecum and the remainder was apparently degraded elsewhere; there was evidence of urea degradation in the large intestine posterior to the caecum and it is suggested that urea degradation and absorption of the resultant NH3 may occur in the ileum.

8. Of the 4.8 g N/d entering the caecal NH3 pool, 4.2 g N/d left and did not return and the difference (0.6 g N/d) was recycled, possibly through caecal NH3 → microbial N → NH3.

9. A large proportion of the NH3 entering the caecal NH3 pool (70% or 3.2 g N/d) was apparently derived from degradation of nitrogenous products, other than urea, including rumen microbial N (1.0 g N/d) passing undigested from the small intestine.

10. Less than half the NH3-N of caecal origin entering the rumen passed through the blood urea pool; the remainder was apparently transported as other nitrogenous compounds in the blood or body fluids.

11. The results of the three experiments were combined in a general three-pool, opencompartment model which formally recognizes an unlimited number of other unspecified, interconnected pools together comprising the whole-animal system. Rates of flux through, and transfer of N between these and other nitrogenous pools in the body were calculated by solving this model and the information derived has been applied to whole-animal models with a view to subsequently using these models in computer simulation studies.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 127 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1976

References

Bird, P. R. (1972). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 25, 1073.Google Scholar
Clare, N. T. & Stevenson, A. E. (1964). N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 7, 198.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. M. W., Ellinger, G. M. & Phillipson, A. T. (1966). Proc. R. Soc. B 166, 63.Google Scholar
Cocimano, M. R. (1972). Metabolism of urea in sheep. PhD Thesis, The University of New England, Australia.Google Scholar
Coelho da Silva, J. F., Seeley, R. C., Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E. & Armstrong, D. G. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 28, 43.Google Scholar
Depocas, F. & DeFreitas, A. S. W. (1970). Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 48, 557.Google Scholar
Downes, A. M. & McDonald, I. W. (1964). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, W. C. & Huston, J. E. (1968). J. Nutr. 95, 67.Google Scholar
Evrard, E., Hoet, P. P., Eyssen, H., Charlier, H. & Sacquet, E. (1964). Br. J. exp. Path. 45, 409.Google Scholar
Giordano, C. (1963). J. Lab. clin. Med. 62, 231.Google Scholar
Hakim, A. A. & Lifson, N. (1964). Am. J. Physiol. 206, 1315.Google Scholar
Harrop, C. J. F. & Phillipson, A. T. (1974). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 83, 237.Google Scholar
Hecker, J. F. (1967). Studies on the metabolism of nitrogenous compounds in the large intestine of herbivores. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hecker, J. F. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 26, 135.Google Scholar
Hecker, J. F. & Nolan, J. V. (1971). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 24, 403.Google Scholar
Hogan, J. P., Weston, R. H. & Lindsay, J. R. (1969). Aust. J. agric. Res. 20, 925.Google Scholar
Houpt, T. R. (1963). Am. J. Physiol. 205, 1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houpt, T. R. (1970). In The Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, p. 119 [Phillipson, A. T., editor]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Hume, I. D., Moir, R. J. & Somers, M. (1970). Aust. J. agric. Res. 21, 283.Google Scholar
Hungate, R. E. (1966). The Rumen and its Microbes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Levenson, S. M., Crowley, L. V., Horowitz, R. E. & Malm, O. J. (1959). J. biol. Chem. 234, 2061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, J. & Gurpide, E. (1966). J. clin. Endocr. 26, 1346.Google Scholar
Marsh, W. H., Fingerhut, B. & Kirsch, E. (1957). Am. J. clin. Path. 28, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazanov, A. &. Nolan, J. V. (1976). Br. J. Nutr. 35, 149.Google Scholar
Murray, R. M. (1973). Nutrition and digestive function of the ruminant. PhD Thesis, The University of New England, Australia.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. V. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant [McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale, Australia: University of New England Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. V. & Leng, R. A. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, J. V. & Leng, R. A. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 27, 177.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. V. & Leng, R. A. (1973). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 32, 93.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. V. & Leng, R. A. (1974). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 33, I.Google Scholar
Raabe, R. R. (1968). Lab. Pract. 17, 217.Google Scholar
Richards, P. (1972). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 25, 615.Google Scholar
Salter, D. N. (1973). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 32, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidhu, K. S., Jones, E. E. & Tillman, A. D. (1968). J. Anim. Sci. 27, 1703.Google Scholar
Walser, M. & Bodenlos, L. J. (1959). J. clin. Invest. 38, 1617.Google Scholar
White, R. G., Steel, J. W., Leng, R. A. & Luick, J. R. (1969). Biochem. J. 114, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, E., Phillips, S. F. & Summerskill, W. H. J. (1971). Lancet ii, 1387.Google Scholar