Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:17:15.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fertility of dairy heifers given a commercial diet free of β-carotene*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2008

Y. Folman
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
I. Ascarell
Affiliation:
The Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel
Z. Herz
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
M. Rosenberg
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
M. Davidsons
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
A. Halevi
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Dairy heifers given concentrates including vitamin A and wheat straw from 7 to 17 months of age had an average plasma β-carotene concentration of 20–60 μg/1. Control heifers given the same diet but supplemented with β-carotene had a β-carotene plasma concentration of 630–2190 μg/1.

2. In contrast to previous findings no differences in duration of standing oestrus, length of oestrous cycle, plasma progresterone and luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations and interval between LH peak and ovulation were observed between the groups. All the heifers conceived after one or two inseminations; conception rate being 69% for heifers given a diet free of β-carotene and 78% for the controls.

3. Average rate of growth of heifers not supplemented with β-carotene was 0.75±0.02 kg/d v. 0.81±0.02 kg/d for the controls (P < 0.02).

4. The possible reasons for the discrepancy between present and previous findings are discussed.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1979

References

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock No. 2, Ruminants. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ahlswede, L. & Lotthamer, K. H. (1977). Dt. tierärztl. Wschr. 85, 7.Google Scholar
Anwandter Quentin, C. G. (1974). Progesteron und β-Carotin-Gehalt des bovinen Corpus Luteum wahrend der verschiedenen Phasen des Sexualzyklus in Abhangigkeit von der Jahreszeit. DMV thesis, Hannover School of Veterinary Medicine.Google Scholar
Ayalon, N. & Weis, Y. (1970). Refuah vet. 27, 22.Google Scholar
Bruggemann, J. & Niesar, K. H. (1957). Vitum. Horm., Lpz. 7, 10.Google Scholar
Eger, S., Schindler, H. & Amir, S. (1975). Hussudeh 55, 1851.Google Scholar
Ermacenko, N. N. (1960). cited by Anim. Breed. Abstr. (1962), 30, 1721.Google Scholar
Lotthamer, K. H., Ahleswede, L. & Meyer, H. (1976). Dt. tierärztl. Wschr. 83, 353.Google Scholar
Meyer, H., Ahlswede, L. & Lotthamer, K. H. (1975). Dt. tierärztl. Wschr. 82, 444.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (1971). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 4th ed.Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Niswender, G. D., Reichert, L. E., Midgley, A. R. & Nalbandov, A. V. (1969). Endocrinology 84, 1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxender, W. D., Hafs, H. D. & Edgerton, L. A. (1972). J. Anim. Sci. 35, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, M., Herz, Z., Davidson, M. & Folman, Y. (1977). J. Reprod. Fert. 51, 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schams, D., Hoffmann, B., Lotthamer, K. H. & Ahlswede, L. (1977). Dt. tierurztl. Wschr. 84, 307.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. Y., Ganguly, J. & Kon, S. K. (1949). Br. J. Nutr. 3, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar