Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:38:00.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Excess energy intake promotes the development of hypoalbuminaemia in rats fed on low-protein diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

P. G. Lunn  and
S. Austin
P. G. Lunn
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council, Dunn Nutrition Unit, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1XJ
S. Austin
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council, Dunn Nutrition Unit, Milton Road, Cambridge CB4 1XJ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A group of rats were given ad lib. a diet with a protein-energy: total energy (P:E) value of 0·03. Other animals received the same protein intake (g/kg body-weight per d) as this group, but had their energy consumption reduced to either 90, 80. 70, 60 or 50% of the ad lib. value.

2. The restricted growth rate of rats fed on the P:E – 0·03 diet ad lib. has been shown to be due entirely to their insufficient protein consumption. In contrast, energy intake was far in excess of that required for maintenance and the limited amount of growth.

3. Carcass analysis demonstrated that some of the excess energy intake was stored as fat, but a greater part had been dissipated, presumably by diet-induced thermogenesis.

4. The plasma concentration of triiodothyronine (T3) was elevated in all animals consuming excess energy and was significantly related to both the total surplus and the amount of energy dissipated.

5. In the group of animals restricted to 50% of the ad lib. intake, energy rather than protein appeared to be the factor limiting growth. Energy intake was below estimated requirements for maintenance and was associated with values for plasma T3 that were lower than those found in well-fed control rats.

6. Although all the animals had similar protein intakes, plasma albumin concentration differed between the groups and was found to be inversely proportional to the energy intake. Thus it was lowest in animals receiving food ad lib. and rose to near normal values in the most-severely-restricted rats.

7. It is suggested that hypoalbuminaemia, and perhaps other features of protein deficiency, seen in animals fed on low-P:E diets may occur as an undesirable consequence of the metabolic response required to deal with excess energy consumption.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 9 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

Brown, J. G., Bates, P. C., Holliday, A. & Millward, D. J. (1981). Biochem. J. 194, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canolty, N. L. & Koong, L. J. (1976). J. Nutr. 106, 1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coward, W. A. & Lunn, P. G. (1981). Br. med. Bull. 37, 19.Google Scholar
Coward, W. A., Whitehead, R. G. & Lunn, P. G. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 38, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danforth, E. Jr, Horton, E. S., O'Connell, M., Sims, E. A. H., Burger, A. G., Ingbar, S. H., Braverman, L. & Vagenakis, A. G. (1979). J. clin. Invest. 64, 1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edozien, J. C., Niehaus, N., Mar, M.-H., Makoui, T., & Switzer, B. R. (1978). J. Nutr. 108, 1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. & Miller, D. S. (1968). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 27, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flaim, K. E., Li, J. B. & Jefferson, L. S. (1978). Am. J. Physiol. 235, E231.Google Scholar
Gopalan, C. (1968). In Calorie Deficiencies and Protein Deficiencies, p. 49 [McCance, R.A. and Widdowson, E. M., editors]. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Heard, C. R. C., Frangi, S. M., Wright, P. M. & McCartney, P. R. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 37, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagot, S. A., Webb, G. P., Rogers, P. D. & Dickerson, J. W. T. (1970). IRCS Med. Sci. 8, 93.Google Scholar
Jefferson, L. S., Li, J. B. & Rannels, S. R. (1977). J. biol. Chem. 252, 1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, R. T., Shetty, P. S. & James, W. P. T. (1980). Clin. Sci. 58, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunn, P. G. & Austin, S. (1982). Ann. Nutr. Metab. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Lunn, P. G., Whitehead, R. G. & Baker, B. A. (1976). Br. J. Nutr. 36, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendez, J. & Kollias, J. (1977). J. appl. Physiol. 42, 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. S. & Payne, P. R. (1962). J. Nutr. 78, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northam, B. E. & Widdowson, G. W. (1967). Ass. Clin. Biochem. tech. Bull. no. 11.Google Scholar
Pace, N. & Rathbun, E. N. (1945). J. biol. Chem. 158, 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peavy, D. E., Taylor, J. M. & Jefferson, L. S. (1981a). Am. J. Physiol. 240, E18.Google Scholar
Peavy, D. E., Taylor, J. M. & Jefferson, L. S. (1981b). Biochem. J. 198, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothwell, N. J. & Stock, M. J. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 41, 625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheng, H.-P. & Huggins, R. A. (1979). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 32, 630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirling, J. L. & Stock, M. J. (1968). Nature, Lond. 220, 801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulp, O. L., Krupp, P. P., Danforth, E. Jr. & Horton, E. S. (1979). J. Nutr. 109, 1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, R. W. & Alleyne, G. A. O. (1972). Br. med. Bull. 28, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar