Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:59:32.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy restriction initiated at different gestational ages has varying effects on maternal weight gain and pregnancy outcome in common marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Suzette Tardif ,
Michael Power ,
Donna Layne ,
Darlene Smucny  and
Toni Ziegler
Suzette Tardif*
Affiliation:
Southwest National Primate Research Center, PO Box 760549, San Antonio, TX 78245-0549, USA
Michael Power
Affiliation:
Southwest National Primate Research Center, PO Box 760549, San Antonio, TX 78245-0549, USA
Donna Layne
Affiliation:
Southwest National Primate Research Center, PO Box 760549, San Antonio, TX 78245-0549, USA
Darlene Smucny
Affiliation:
Southwest National Primate Research Center, PO Box 760549, San Antonio, TX 78245-0549, USA
Toni Ziegler
Affiliation:
Southwest National Primate Research Center, PO Box 760549, San Antonio, TX 78245-0549, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Suzette D. Tardif, fax +1 210 258 9883, email, [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

With relatively high fertility and short lifespan, marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus) may become useful primate models of prenatal nutritional effects on birth condition and adult disease risk. The present study determined the effects of energy restriction to 75% of expected ad libitum consumption during mid- (day 66) or late (day 99) gestation on maternal weight, fetal growth and pregnancy outcomes in this species. Mid-restriction reliably induced the loss of pregnancy before term, at 92 d, on average. Of the late-restricted pregnancies, four of seven were normal term length while three were preterm deliveries, at 101, 117 and 132 d. Control females had a mean mid-pregnancy weight gain of 0·67 g/d while mid-restricted females lost −0·65 g/d, on average. Control pregnancies averaged a 1·06 g/d gain during late pregnancy, while energy-restricted females lost −0·67 g/d, on average. Restriction-related weight change was highly variable, ranging from +0·55 to −2·56 g/d for mid-restriction pregnancies and from +0·79 to −3·91 g/d for late-restriction pregnancies. For mid-restriction pregnancies, the number of restriction days was best explained by linear weight change and total weight loss while the number of restriction days in late pregnancy was best explained by linear weight change alone. In late-restriction pregnancies, smaller females had higher daily weight losses. Restrictions did not induce litter-size reduction or growth restriction in those infants that were delivered at term but the size of aborted fetuses suggested that at least some pregnancies lost preterm may have involved impaired intra-uterine growth.

Keywords

Energy restrictionMaternal weightPregnancyPrimatesBirth weight
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 92 , Issue 5 , November 2004 , pp. 841 - 849
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2004

References

Abbott, DH, Barnett, DK, Colman, RJ & Schultz-Darken, NJ (2003) Aspects of basic biology and life history of common marmosets important for biomedical research. Comp Med 53, 339–350.Google ScholarPubMed
Barker, DJ (2001) The malnourished baby and infant. Br Med Bull 60, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayol, S, Jones, D, Goldspink, G & Stickland, N (2004) The influence of undernutrition during gestation on skeletal muscle and on the expression of genes that control muscle growth. Br J Nutr 91, 331–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bispham, J, Gopalakrishnan, GS, Dandrea, J, Wilson, V, Budge, H, Keisler, DH, Broughton Pipkin, F, Stephenson, T & Symonds, ME (2003) Maternal endocrine adaptation throughout pregnancy to nutritional manipulation: consequences for maternal plasma leptin and cortisol and the programming of fetal adipose tissue development. Endocrinol 144, 3575–3585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloomfield, FH, Oliver, MH, Giannoulias, D, Gluckman, PD, Harding, JE & Challis, JRG (2003 a) Brief undernutrition in late-gestation sheep programs the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in adult offspring. Endocrinol 144, 2933–2940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloomfield, FH, Oliver, MH, Hawkins, P, Campbell, M, Phillips, DJ, Gluckman, PD, Challis, JRG & Harding, JE (2003 b) A periconceptional nutritional origin for noninfectious preterm birth. Science 300, 606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J, Murtaugh, M, Jacobs, D & Margellos, H (2002) Variation in newborn size according to pregnancy weight change by trimester. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 205–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Challis, JRG, Matthews, SG, Gibb, W & Lye, SJ (2000) Endocrine and paracrine regulation of birth at term and preterm. Endocr Rev 21, 514–550.Google Scholar
Chambers, PL & Hearn, JP (1985) Embryonic, foetal and placental development in the common marmoset monkey ( Callithrix jacchus ). J Zool Lond 207, 545–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisari, A, Biovambattista, N, Perello, M & Spinedi, E (2001) Impact of maternal undernutrition on hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis and adipocyte functions in male rat offspring. Endocrine 14, 375–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doubilet, PM, Benson, CB, Wilkins-Haug, L & Ringer, S (2003) Fetuses subsequently born premature are smaller than gestational age-matched fetuses not born premature. J Ultrasound Med 22, 359–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, L, Coulter, C, Symonds, M & McMillen, I (2001) Prenatal undernutrition, glucocorticoids and the programming of adult hypertension. Clin Experim Pharmacol Physiol 28, 938–941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, LJ & McMillen, IC (2001) Maternal undernutrition increases arterial blood pressure in the sheep fetus during late gestation. J Physiol 533, 561–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrenberg, H, Dierker, L, Milluzzi, C & Mercer, B (2003) Low maternal weight, failure to thrive in pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189, 1726–1730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godfrey, KM & Barker, DJ (2001) Fetal programming and adult health. Public Health Nutr 4, 611–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hearn, JP (1986) The embryo-maternal dialogue during early pregnancy in primates. J Reprod Fertil 76, 809–819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hediger, ML, Scholl, TO, Schall, JI, Miller, LW & Fischer, RL (1995) Fetal growth and the etiology of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 85, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaquish, C, Tardif, S, Toal, RL & Carson, RL (1996) Patterns of prenatal survival in the common marmoset ( Callithrix jacchus ). J Med Primatol 25, 57–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaquish, C, Toal, RL, Tardif, S & Carson, RL (1995) Use of ultrasound to monitor prenatal growth and development in the common marmoset ( Callithrix jacchus ). Am J Primatol 36, 259–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kind, KL, Owens, JA, Robinson, JS, Quinn, KJ, Grant, PA, Walton, PE, Gilmour, RS & Owens, PC (1995) Effect of restriction of placental growth on expression of IGFs in fetal sheep: relationship to fetal growth, circulating IGFs and binding proteins. J Endocrinol 146, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohrs, MB, Harper, AE & Kerr, GR (1976) Effects of a low-protein diet during pregnancy of the rhesus monkey I. Reproductive efficiency. Am J Clin Nutr 29, 136–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lederman, S & Rosso, P (1980) Effects of food restriction on fetal and placental growth and maternal body composition. Growth 44, 77–88.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, M, Eguchi, Y, Arishima, K & Chan, K-Y (1980) Compensatory adrenal hypertrophic response in fetuses of calorie-malnourished rats. Biol Neonate 37, 153–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lunn, SF (1983) Body weight changes throughout pregnancy in the common marmoset Callithrix jacchus. Folia Primatol (Basel) 41, 204–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McFarland, R (1997) Female primates: fat or fit? In The Evolving Female, 163–175 [Morbeck, M, Galloway, A and Zihlman, A, editors] Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Merker, HJ, Sames, K, Csato, W, Heger, W & Neubert, D (1988) The embryology of Callithrix jacchus. In Non-Human Primates – Developmental Biology and Toxicology. 217–239 [Neubert, D, Merker, H-J and Hendrickx, AG, editors]. Berlin: Ueberreuter-Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
National Research Council Committee on Animal Nutrition (2003) Nutrient Requirements of Nonhuman Primates. 2nd revised ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Nievergelt, CM & Martin, RD (1999) Energy intake during reproduction in captive common marmosets ( Callithrix jacchus ). Physiol Behav 65, 849–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pere, M (2003) Materno-foetal exchanges and utilisation of nutrients by the foetus: comparison between species. Reprod Nutr Dev 43, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pond, W, Mersmann, H, Yen, J & Daris, W (1989) Reproduction and organ weight responses in female rats fed a restricted balanced diet or a restricted nonprotein calorie diet with or without supplemental glutamine or cysteine. Growth Reprod Devel 53, 17–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Pond, W, Yen, J & Mersmann, H (1988) Maternal tissue re-partitioning in pregnant primiparous swine in response to restriction of calories or feed. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 188, 128–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, L, Ho, H & Taper, L (1984) Effect of caloric restriction during pregnancy on maternal and fetal body composition in the obese Sprague-Dawley rat. J Nutr 114, 2247–2255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudge, MV, Gomes, CM, Calderon Ide, M, Ramos, MD, Abbade, JF, de, Oliveira, MG, da & Silva, MG (1997) Study of the evolution of the placenta and fetal pancreas in the pathophysiology of growth retardation intrauterine due to restricted maternal diet. Sao Paulo Med J 117, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroder, HJ (2003) Models of fetal growth restriction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 110, Suppl. 1, S29–S39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tardif, S, Jaquish, C, Layne, D, Bales, K, Power, M, Power, R & Oftedal, O (1998 a) Growth variation in common marmoset monkeys ( Callithrix jacchus ) fed a purified diet: relation to care-giving and weaning behaviors. Lab Anim Sci 48, 264–269.Google ScholarPubMed
Tardif, S, Layne, D, Cancino, L & Smucny, DA (2002) Neonatal behavioral scoring of common marmosets ( Callithrix jacchus ): relation to physical condition and survival. J Med Primatol 31, 147–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tardif, S, Power, M, Oftedal, O, Power, R & Layne, D (2001) Lactation, maternal behavior and infant growth in common marmoset monkeys ( Callithrix jacchus ): effects of maternal size and litter size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51, 17–25.Google Scholar
Tardif, SD, Jaquish, CE, Toal, RL, Layne, DG & Power, RA (1998 b) Estimation of gestational ages in the common marmoset ( Callithrix jacchus ) from published prenatal growth curves. J Med Primatol 27, 28–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tardif, SD, Smucny, DA, Abbott, DH, Mansfield, K, Schultz-Darken, N & Yamamoto, ME (2003) Reproduction in captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Comp Med 53, 364–368.Google ScholarPubMed