Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:55:58.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of the amount and quality of dietary protein on nitrogen metabolism and protein turnover of pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. F. Fuller ,
P. J. Reeds ,
A. Cadenhead ,
B. Seve  and
T. Preston
M. F. Fuller
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
P. J. Reeds
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
A. Cadenhead
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
B. Seve
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
T. Preston
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Research Reactor Centre, East Kilbride, Glasgow G75 0QU
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The interrelations between protein accretion and whole-body protein turnover were studied by varying the quantity and quality of protein given to growing pigs.

2. Diets with 150 or 290g lysine-deficient protein/kg were given in hourly meals, with or without lysine supplementation, to female pigs (mean weight 47 kg).

3. After the animals were adapted to the diets, a constant infusion of [14C]urea was given intra-arterially for 30 h, during the last 6 h of which an infusion of [4,5-3H] leucine was also infused at a constant rate. At the same time, yeast-protein labelled with 15N was given in the diet for 50 h.

4. The rate of urea synthesis was estimated from the specific radioactivity (SR) of plasma urea. The rate of leucine flux was estimated from the SR of plasma leucine. The irrevocable breakdown of leucine was estimated from the 3H-labelling of body water. Total N flux was estimated from the 16N-labelling of urinary urea.

5. Addition of lysine to the low-protein diet significantly increased N retention, with a substantial reduction in leucine breakdown, but there was no significant change in the flux of leucine or of total N.

6. Increasing the quantity of the unsupplemented protein also increased N retention significantly, with concomitant increases in leucine breakdown and in the fluxes of leucine and of total N.

7. It is concluded that a doubling of protein accretion brought about by the improvement of dietary protein quality is not necessarily associated with an increased rate of whole-body protein turnover.

Type
General Nutrition papers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , September 1987 , pp. 287 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1987

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1981). The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Bassett, J. M.& Thorburn, G. D. (1971). Journal of Endocrinology 50, 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. & Boyne, A. W. (1970). Analyst 95, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, B., Laplace, J. P. & Duée, P. H. (1982). Annales de Zootechnie 29, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, J. K. & Scott, J. E. (1960). Journal of Clinical Pathology 13, 156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fern, E. B., Garlick, P. J. & Waterlow, J. C. (1985 a). Clinical Science 68, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fern, E. B., Garlick, P. J. & Waterlow, J. C. (1985 b). Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition 39c, 85–99.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. F., Cadenhead, A., Mollison, G. & Seve, B. (1987 a). British Journal of Nutrition 58, 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M. F., Cadenhead, A., Reeds, P. J., Mollison, G. & Seve, B. (1987 b). In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, European Association for Animal Production, publication no. 32, pp. 2–5 [Moe, P. W., Tyrell, H. F. and Reynolds, P. J., editors]. Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hayase, K. & Yoshida, A. (1980). Nutrition Reports International 22, 235–244.Google Scholar
Houseman, R. A., McDonald, I. & Pennie, K. (1973). British Journal of Nutrition 30, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotarbińska, M. (1969). Badania nad Przemianą Energii u Rosnących Śwń. Wlasne Instytut Zootechniki, Wroclaw, no. 238.Google Scholar
Marsh, W. H., Fingerhut, B. & Miller, H. (1965). Clinical Chemistry 11, 624–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millward, D. J., Garlick, P. J. & Reeds, P. J. (1976). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 35, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omstedt, P. T., Kihlberg, R., Tingrall, P. & Shenkin, A. (1978). Journal of Nutrition 108, 1877–1882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, T. & East, B. W. (1982). The Measurement of 15N in Biological Samples with Particular Reference to Whole Body Protein Turnover Studies. Scottish Universities Research and Reactor Centre, publication no. 70/82. East Kilbride: Scottish Universities Research and Reactor Centre.Google Scholar
Preston, T. & Owens, N. J. P. (1983). Analyst 108, 971–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, W. W. C., Harrison, R. A. & Halliday, D. (1982). Analytical Biochemistry 123, 249–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeds, P. J., Cadenhead, A., Fuller, M. F., Lobley, G. E. & McDonald, J. D. (1980). British Journal of Nutrition 43, 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeds, P. J., Fuller, M. F., Cadenhead, A., Lobley, G. E. & McDonald, J. D. (1981). British Journal of Nutrition 45, 539–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeder, R. A. & Broderick, G. A. (1981). Nutrition Reports International 24, 361–369.Google Scholar
Simon, O., Zebrowska, T., Bergner, H. & Münchmeyer, R. (1983). Archiv für Tierenährung 33, 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar