Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:57:59.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of short- and long-term feeding of zinc oxide-supplemented diets on the mature, female domestic fowl with special reference to tissue mineral content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

N. Jackson ,
S. W. Gibson  and
M. H. Stevenson
N. Jackson
Affiliation:
Agricultura1 and Food Chemistry Research Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
S. W. Gibson
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
M. H. Stevenson
Affiliation:
Agricultura1 and Food Chemistry Research Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. In Expt 1, the effects on laying hens of diets supplemented with zinc oxide providing up to 20 gadded zinc/kg were compared. In Expt 2 the diets contained up to 6 g added Zn/kg.

2. In both experiments, food intake, body-weight, egg number, and liver, oviduct and ovary weights/kg body-weight were significantly reduced by added ZnO; gizzard weight/kg body-weight was significantly increased. In Expt 2, pancreas weight was significantly reduced by added ZnO.

3. Liver, kidney and pancreatic Zn and iron concentrations were significantly elevated in both experiments.

4. In both experiments, liver, kidneys and pancreatic copper concentrations gave quadratic responses to added ZnO.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , March 1986 , pp. 333 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1986

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1975). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock no. 1, Poultry. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Brake, J., Thaxton, P., Pardue, S. L. & Morgan, G. W. (1977). Poultry Science 56, 1697–1698 Abstr.Google Scholar
Butler, E. J. (1971). In Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl, pp. 397–426 [Bell, D. J. and Freeman, B. M., editors]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cox, D. H. & Hale, O.M. (1962). Journal of Nutrition 77, 225–228.Google Scholar
Cox, D. H. & Harris, D. L. (1960). Journal of Nutrition 70, 514–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creger, C. R. & Scott, J. T. (1977). Poultry Science 56, 1706 Abstr.Google Scholar
Dewar, W. A, Wight, P. A. L., Pearson, R. A. & Gentle, M. J. (1983). British Poultry Science 24, 397–404.Google Scholar
Eltohamy, M. M., Takahara, H. & Okamato, M. (1980). Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University 24, 189–199.Google Scholar
Fisher, C., Laursen-Jones, A. P., Hill, K. J. & Hardy, W. S. (1973). British Poultry Science 14, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folch, J., Lees, M. & Sloane Stanley, G. H. (1957). Journal of Biological Chemistry 226, 497–509.Google Scholar
Gentle, M. J., Dewar, W. A., Wight, P. A. L. & Dick, K. M. (1982). Journal of Intake Research 3, 53–60.Google Scholar
Griminger, P. (1976). In Avian Physiology, 3rd ed., p. 312 [Sturkie, P. D., editor]. New York, Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Halkett, J. A. E., Peters, T. & Ross, J. F. (1958). Journal of Biological Chemistry 231, 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, R. P., Fox, M. R. S., Fry, B. E. Jr, Jones, A. O. L. & Jacobs, R. M. (1979). Journal of Food Science 44, 738–741.Google Scholar
Hermayer, K. L., Stake, P. E. & Shippee, R. L. (1977). Poultry Science 56, 1721–1722 Abstr.Google Scholar
Johnson, D., Mehring, A. L., Savino, F. X. & Titus, H. W. (1962). Poultry Science 41, 311–317.Google Scholar
Kare, M. R. & Rogers, T. G. (1976). In Avian Physiology, 3rd ed., pp. 29–52 [Sturkie, P. D., editor]. New York, Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Kincaid, R. L., Miller, W. J., Fowler, P. R., Gentry, R. P., Hampton, D. L. & Neathery, M. W. (1976 a). Journal of Dairy Science 59, 1580–1584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, R. L., Miller, W. J., Jensen, L. S., Hampton, D. L., Neathery., M. W. & Gentry, R. P. (1976 b). Poultry Science 53, 1954–1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leveille, G. A. (1969). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 23, 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, A. C. & Matrone, G. (1960). Journal of Nutrition 72, 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, A. C. & Spahr, S. (1964). Journal of Nutrition 82, 209–216.Google Scholar
Miller, W. J., Clifton, C. M., Fowler, P. R. & Perkins, H. F. (1965). Journal of Dairy Science 48, 450–453.Google Scholar
Oh, S. H., Nakave, H., Deagen, J. T., Whanger, P. D. & Arscott, G. H. (1979). Journal of Nutrition 109, 1720–1729.Google Scholar
Ott, E. A., Smith, W. H., Harrington, R. B. & Beeson, W. M. (1966 a). Journal of Animal Science 25, 414–418.Google Scholar
Ott, E. A., Smith, W. H., Harrington, R. B., Stob, B. M., Parker, H. E. & Beeson, W. M. (1966b). Journal of Animal Science 25, 424–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palafox, A. L. & Ho-A, E. (1980). Poultry Science 59, 2024–2028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. (1971). Biochemical Journal 123, 717–719.Google Scholar
Ritchie, H. D., Leucke, R. W., Baltzer, E. V., Miller, E. R., Ullrey, D. E. & Hoefer, J. A. (1963). Journal of Nutrition 79, 117–123.Google Scholar
Roberson, R. H. & Schaible, P. J. (1960). Poultry Science 39, 893–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanoff, A. L. & Romanoff, A. J. (1949).The Avian Egg, pp. 353–358. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Shippee, R. L., Stake, P. E., Koehn, N. V., Lambert, J. L. & Simmons, R. W. (1979). Poultry Science 58, 949–954.Google Scholar
Stevenson, M.H. & Jackson, N. (1981). British Journal of Nutrition 46, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vohra, P. & Heil, J. R. (1969). Poultry Science 48, 1686–1691.Google Scholar