Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T20:34:49.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of diffusion and viscosity on ruminant faecal excretion of markers in a simple compartmental model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. H. M. Thornley ,
J. France ,
M. S. Dhanoa  and
R. C. Siddons
J. H. M. Thornley
Affiliation:
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology (Edinburgh), Bush Estate, Penicuik EH26 0QB
J. France
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, North Wyke Research Station, North Wyke, Okehampton EX20 2SB
M. S. Dhanoa
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB
R. C. Siddons
Affiliation:
formerly AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Using equations obtained in a previous analysis, results are computed numerically which illustrate the effects of diffusion and viscosity on faecal excretion patterns of markers in ruminants. Results are first given for plug flow, a velocity gradient produced by viscosity, and diffusion, each mechanism operating alone. Plug flow gives a period during which no marker appears in the faeces, then a sharp increase in faeces marker concentration, followed by rapid washout. A velocity gradient gives a more gradual appearance of marker in the faeces followed by a slower washout. DMusiou alone (although not realistic for ruminant marker kinetics) can give early appearance of marker followed by slow washout. Combining diffusion with a velocity gradient produced by viscosity can give a range of behaviour, depending on the effective diffusion coefficient, D'; an approximate method is used to compute these solutions. Because plug flow with no velocity gradient plus diffusion gives results similar to convective flow with a velocity gradient plus diffusion, we believe it will not be possible to determine the main mechanisms defining marker outtiow patterns from observations of marker kinetics alone, and more detailed investigations will be needed. Although estimates of quantities such as mean transit time are unaffected by detailed mechanism, the interpretations of measures such as sigmoidicity, sharpness of the faecal marker concentration v. time curve, and length and nature of the washout tail are highly dependent on mechanism.

Keywords

RuminantsDigesta markersCompartmental modelDiffusionViscosity
Type
Ruminant faecal excretion of markers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 74 , Issue 6 , December 1995 , pp. 747 - 763
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1995

References

Beauchemin, K. A. & Buchanan-Smith, J. G. (1987). Evaluation of markers, sampling sites, and models for estimating rates of passage of silage or hay. Journal of Dairy Science 70, Suppl. 1, 193.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Some observations on the digestibility of food by sheep, and related problems. British Journal of Nutrition 10, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhanoa, M. S., France, J. & Siddons, R. C. (1989). On using a double-exponential model for describing faecal marker concentration curves. Journal of Theoretical Biology 141, 247–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhanoa, M. S., Siddons, R. C., France, J. & Gale, D. L. (1985). A multicompartmental model to describe the marker excretion pattern in ruminant faeces. British Journal of Nutrition 53, 663–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, W. C., Matis, J. H. & Lascano, C. (1979). Quantitating ruminal turnover. Federation Proceedings 38, 2702–2706.Google ScholarPubMed
Faichney, G. J. (1975). The use of markers to partition digestion within the gastro-intestinal tract of ruminants. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant pp. 277–291. [McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale, NSW: University of New England.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. & Boston, R. C. (1983). Interpretation of the faecal excretion patterns of solute and particulate markers in the rumen of sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 575–581.Google Scholar
Ferreiro Gutierrez, H. M. (1986). Forages as supplements for molasses-based diets in cattle. PhD Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
France, J., Dhanoa, M. S., Siddons, R. C., Thornley, J. H. M. & Poppi, D. P. (1988). Estimating the production of faeces by ruminants from faecal marker concentration curves. Journal of Theoretical Biology 135, 383–391.Google Scholar
France, J., Thornley, J. H. M., Dhanoa, M. S. & Siddons, R. C. (1985). On the mathematics of digesta flow kinetics. Journal of Theoretical Biology 113, 743–758.Google Scholar
France, J., Thornley, J. H. M., Siddons, R. C. & Dhanoa, M. S. (1993). On incorporating diffusion and viscosity concepts into compartmental models for analysing faecal marker excretion patterns in ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 70, 369–378.Google Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1973). Rate of passage of digesta in sheep. IV. Passage of marker through the alimentary tract and the biological significance of rate constants derived from the changes in concentration of marker in faeces. British Journal of Nutrition 30, 313–329.Google Scholar
Kaske, M., Hatiboglu, S. & Engelhardt, W. V. (1992). The influence of density and size of particles of rumination and passage from the reticulo-rumen of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 67, 235–244.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., MacRae, J. C., Spence, A. M. & Wilson, S. (1978). A comparison of the voluntary intake and digestion of a range of forages at different times of the year by the sheep and the red deer (Cervus elaphus). British Journal of Nutrition 40, 347–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, F. H. & Searle, V. H. L. (1948). The General Properties of Matter, 4th ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1990). An easy-to-use formula for contaminant dispersion. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 215, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. (1953). Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Proceedings of the Royal Society (London) B 219, 186–203.Google Scholar