Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:31:11.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of age, dietary restriction, exercise and maternity on the abundance and volume of adipocytes in twelve adipose depots of adult guinea-pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Caroline M. Pond ,
Christine A. Mattacks ,
Marion C. Thomson  and
Dawin Sadler
Caroline M. Pond
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA
Christine A. Mattacks
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA
Marion C. Thomson
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA
Dawin Sadler
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The mean adipocyte volume and cellularity of adipose tissue in twelve anatomically defined depots were measured in 190 virgin and reproductive guinea-pigs aged 6 months to 2 years, maintained on five different regimens of diet and exercise.

2. The total adipocyte complement was constant up to the age of about 10 months and increased by 65–70% during the 2nd year of life. At constant percentage body-weight as fat, age-related accumulation of adipocytes was accompanied by reduction in average adipocyte volume. A period of high percentage body-weight as fat was not a necessary antecedent to age-related accumulation of adipocytes, and the effect was not observed in specimens that exercised regularly.

3. In guinea-pigs over 13 months old, changes in adipose tissue cellularity made a major contribution to total fatness. The mean volume of samples of adipocytes was a satisfactory indicator of fatness only in younger specimens in which adipose tissue cellularity was not changing.

4. The lean body mass and the total adipocyte complement were lower in guinea-pigs on the sedentary, restricted-diet regimen, whether the regimen began at the age of 19 weeks or 31 weeks, but the depots studied were not equally affected. Both moderate and strenuous exercise on an ad lib. diet caused a reduction in the percentage body-weight as fat in males but not in females. The total adipocyte complement and lean body mass were unchanged, although the males became almost as thin following exercise as those on the restricted-diet regimen.

5. Among guinea-pigs under 400 d old, there were no significant differences between males and virgin females in the site-specific volume of adipocytes relative to the size of those in other depots of the same specimen; there was only one significant difference in this index between the older and the younger specimens. The diet and exercise regimens modified the site-specific adipocyte volume relative to those in other depots; adipocytes under the trapezius muscle of the neck (UMN), at the interscapular depot (HUMP) and those in the depots anterior to the forelimb became relatively smaller following exercise, while those in the popliteal fat mass were relatively larger. Adipocytes in the UMN and HUMP also became more numerous relative to those in the other depots following both moderate and strenuous exercise. Those in the groin site, the intra-abdominal depots and the intermuscular depots became relatively smaller following dietary restriction without exercise.

6. The retroperitoneal depot was the most consistently and extensively depleted following dietary restriction without exercise, and the mesenteric and omental, ventral groin and anterior forelimb depots were not significantly depleted in any of the virgin guinea-pigs on this regmen. Thus those on the restricted diet had more adipocytes at these depots, in proportion to lean body mass, than the ad lib.-fed controls. Following age-related adipocyte proliferation, there were relatively more adipocytes in the abdominal depots, and relatively fewer in depots around the forelimbs in guinea-pigs that were first exercised strenuously and then placed on a sedentary at lib.-feeding regimen, compared with never-exercised controls.

7. Some of the correlation coefficients between the volumes of adipocytes in all depots studied were significantly higher in the ad lib.-fed, sedentary mothers than in ad lib.-fed sedentary males of the same age. No other effects of maternity on site-specific differences in the relative volume or relative abundance of adipocytes were identified.

8. Site-specific differences in adipocyte accumulation contributed more to age and regimen-related changes in body conformation than changes in the relative volume of adipocytes.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , July 1986 , pp. 29 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1986

References

REFERENCES

Bertrand, H. A., Masoro, E. J. & Yu, B. P. (1978). Science 201, 1234–1235.Google Scholar
Björntorp, P., Calgren, G., Isaksson, B., Krotkiewski, M., Larsson, B. & Sjöström, L. (1975). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 28, 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björntorp, P., Karlsson, M. & Petterson, P. (1982). Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental 31, 366–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comfort, A. (1979). The Biology of Senescence. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Cryer, A. & Jones, H. M. (1978). Biochemical Journal 172, 319–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMartinis, F. D. & Francendese, A. (1982). Journal of Lipid Research 23, 1107–1120.Google Scholar
Di Girolamo, M., Medlinger, S. & Fertig, J. W. (1971). American Journal of Physiology 221, 850–858.Google Scholar
Faust, I. M., Johnson, P. R., Stern, J. S. & Hirsch, J. (1978). American Journal of Physiology 235, E279–E286.Google Scholar
Fried, S. K., Lavau, M. & Pi-Sunyer, F. X. (1982). Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental 31, 876–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldrick, R. B. (1967). American Journal of Physiology 212, 777–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, G. J., Novakofski, J. E., Ramsay, T. & Martin, R. J. (1985). Journal of Animal Science 60, 1553–1561.Google Scholar
Hirsch, J. & Batchelor, B. (1976). Clinics in Endocrinology and Metabolism 5, 299–311.Google Scholar
Hirsch, J. & Han, P. W. (1969). Journal of Lipid Research 10, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. R. & Hirsch, J. (1972). Journal of Lipid Research 13, 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. R., Stern, J. S., Greenwood, M. R. C. & Hirsch, J. (1978). Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental 27, 1941–1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirtland, J. & Gurr, M. I. (1979). International Journal of Obesity 3, 15–55.Google Scholar
Kirtland, J., Gurr, M. I. &Widdowson, E. M. (1976). Nutrition and Metabolism 20, 338–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krotkiewski, M., Björntorp, P., Holm, G., Marks, V., Morgan, L., Smith, U. & Feurle, G. E. (1984). International Journal of Obesity 8, 13–199.Google Scholar
Lanska, D. J., Lanska, M. J., Hartz, A. J. & Rimm, A. A. (1985). International Journal of Obesity 9, 29–38.Google Scholar
Lemmonier, D. (1972). Journal of Clinical Investigation 51, 2907–2915.Google Scholar
Mattacks, C. A. & Pond, C. M. (1985). British Journal of Nutrition 53, 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. & Brent, D. H. (1975). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pond, C. M. (1986). Science Progress 70, 45–71.Google Scholar
Pond, C. M. & Mattacks, C. A. (1985 a). In Functional Morphology of Vertebrates, [Duncker, H. -R. and Fleischer, G., editors]. Stuttgart and New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Pond, C. M. & Mattacks, C. A. (1985 b). Journal of Morphology 185, 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pond, C. M. & Mattacks, C. A. (1985 c). Journal of Morphology 185, 194–202.Google Scholar
Pond, C. M., Mattacks, C. A. & Sadler, D. (1984 a). British Journal of Nutrition 51, 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pond, C. M., Mattacks, C. A. and Sadler, D. (1984 b). British Journal of Nutrition 51, 425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyne, Y., Teyssier, J., Nougues, J. & Tebibel, S. (1985). Journal of Lipid Research 26, 1036–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, A. F. (1981). Child Development 52, 31–43.Google Scholar
Rowlatt, U., Mrosovsky, N. & English, A. (1971). Biology of the Neonate 17, 53–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöström, L. & Björntorp, P. (1974). Acta Medica Scandinavica 195, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiles, J. W., Francendese, A. & Masoro, E. J. (1975). American Journal of Physiology 229, 1561–1568.Google Scholar
Strain, G. W., Strain, J. J., Zumoff, B. & Knittle, J. (1984). International Journal of Obesity 8, 53–59.Google Scholar
Suter, E. R. (1969). Journal of Ultrastructural Research 26, 216–241.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. M. (1978). Foetus into Man: Physical Growth from Conception to Maturity. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. M. & Whitehouse, R. H. (1975). Archives of Diseases of Childhood 50, 142–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., Despres, J. P. & Bouchard, P. (1984). International Journal of Obesity 8, 641–648.Google Scholar
Vernon, R. G. & Flint, D. J. (1984). Symposium of the Zoological Society of London 51, 119–145.Google Scholar