Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:27:00.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of varying energy and protein intake on nitrogen balance in adults engaged in heavy manual labour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2008

A. Iyengar  and
B. S. Narasinga Rao
A. Iyengar
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Jamai-Osmania, Hyderabad-500 007, India
B. S. Narasinga Rao
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Jamai-Osmania, Hyderabad-500 007, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The effect of varying energy and protein intake on nitrogen balance in adult men engaged in heavy manual labour was investigated.

2. Low protein and energy levels resulted in negative N balance and urea index (Waterlow, 1963) was decreased.

3. Urinary excretion of hydroxyproline was found to be sensitive to dietary protein level, but not to energy.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 19 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1979

References

Anasuya, A. (1968). Studies on amino acid metabolism in protein calorie malnutrition. PhD Thesis, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
Calloway, D. H. & Spector, H. (1954). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 2, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaney, A. L. & Marbach, E. P. (1962). Clin. Chem. 8, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, L. C. & Thompson, H. L. (1949). Analyt. Chem. 21, 1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M. F., Doyne, A. W., Atkinson, T. & Smart, R. (1973). Nutr. Rep. int. 7, 175.Google Scholar
Jasin, H. E., Fink, C. W., Wise, W. & Ziff, M. (1962). J. clin. Invest. 41, 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, H. N. (1951). Physiol. Rev. 31, 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nageswara Rao, C., Nadamuni Naidu, A. & Narasinga Rao, B. S. (1975). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 28, 1116.Google Scholar
Oser, B. L. (ed.) (1965). Hawk's physiological chemistry, 14th ed., p. 1326. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Phansalkar, S. V. & Patwardhan, V. N. (1954). Indian J. med. Res. 42, 363.Google Scholar
Phansalkar, S. V. & Patwardhan, V. N. (1956). Indian J. med. Res. 44, 1.Google Scholar
Prockop, D. J. & Sjoerdsma, A. (1961). J. clin. Invest. 40, 843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prockop, D. J. & Udenfriend, S. (1960). Analyt. Biochem. 1, 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramamurti, K. (1955). Indian J. med. Res. 43, 61.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, H. L. & Allison, J. B. (1956). J. Agric. Fd Chem. 4, 792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimke, R. T. (1962). J. biol. Chem. 237, 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spackman, D. M., Stein, W. H. & Moore, S. (1958). Analyt. Chem. 30, 1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swendseid, M. E., Tuttle, S. G., Figueroa, W. S., Mulcare, D., Clark, A. J. & Massey, F. J. (1966). J. Nutr. 88, 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterlow, J. C. (1963). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 12, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, S. C. (1948). J. clin. Invest. 27, 561.Google Scholar
Young, V. R. & Scrimshaw, N. S. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar