Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:04:20.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of variable protein contents in diets containing Phaseolus vulgaris beans on performance, organ weights and blood variables in piglets, rats and chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. Huisman ,
A. F. B. Van Der Poel ,
J. M. V. M. Mouwen  and
J. M. V. M. WEERDEN
J. Huisman
Affiliation:
TNO-Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology (IGMB-Dept ILOB), PO Box 15, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
A. F. B. Van Der Poel
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural University, Haagsteeg 4, 6708 PM Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. M. V. M. Mouwen
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, State University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
J. M. V. M. WEERDEN
Affiliation:
TNO-Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology (IGMB-Dept ILOB), PO Box 15, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A comparison was made of the effects of antinutritional factors present in Phaseolus vulgaris on piglets, rats and chickens. Also the hypothesis of whether the negative effect on weight gain due to the inclusion of raw Phaseolus vulgaris in the diet can be attributed to an insufficient supply of amino acids was tested. Test diets containing 200 g raw Phaseolus beans/kg were balanced for digestible protein and amino acids; in one diet extra casein was incorporated. The main response criteria were live-weight gain and the weight of various organs including the intestine. Live-weight gain in piglets was markedly reduced during feeding 200 g raw Phaseolus vulgaris/kg in the diet, but not in rats and chickens. Addition of casein did not improve the weight gain of the piglets, indicating that a toxic factor was responsible for the reduced weight gain and not an insufficient supply of amino acids. The weights of the spleen and thymus were markedly reduced in the piglets when the diets with raw Phaseolus beans were given, but not in the rats and chickens. Additional supply of casein did not change this effect. Indications were found that when the supply of dietary protein is adequate there is no reduction in pancreas weight with raw Phaseolus beans as was observed in previous experiments. The weight of the intestine was increased in all three species due to feeding raw Phaseolus vulgaris.

Keywords

Antinutritional factorsLectinsPhaseolus vulgarisChickenPigletRat
Type
Comparative Nutritional Effects of Lectins
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , November 1990 , pp. 755 - 764
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1990

References

Barnes, R. H., Falia, G. & Kwong, E. (1962). Methionine supplementation of processed soybeans in the rat. Journal of Nutrition 77, 278–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borchers, R. (1961). Counteraction of the growth depression of raw soybean oil mean by amino acid supplements in weanling rats. Journal of Nutrition 75, 330–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borchers, R. (1962). Supplementary methionine requirement of weanling rats fed soybean oil meal rations. Journal of Nutrition 77, 309–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bressani, R. (1983). Research needs to up-grade the nutritional quality of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Qualitas Plantarum: Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 32, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CVB (1988). Veevoeder tabel: Gegevens over voederwaarde, verteerbaarheid en samenstelling. Lelystad, The Netherlands: Centraal Veevoederbureau in Nederland.Google Scholar
De Oliviera, J. T. A., Pusztai, A. & Grant, G. (1988). Changes in organs and tissues induced by feeding of purified kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) lectins. Nutrition Research 8, 943–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, G. M., Levan, V. H. & Liddle, R. A. (1986). Interaction of dietary protein and trypsin inhibitor on plasma cholecystokinin and pancreatic growth in rats. In Nutritional and Toxicological Significance of Enzyme Inhibitors in Foods, pp. 123–132 [Friedmann, M., editor]. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumbmann, R. M., Spangler, W. L., Dugan, G. M. & Rackis, J. J. (1986). Safety of trypsin inhibitors in the diet: effects on the rat pancreas of the long-term feeding of soy flour and soy protein isolate. In Nutritional and Toxicological Significance of Enzyme Inhibitors in Foods, pp. 33–80 [Friedman, M., editor]. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huisman, J., van der Poel, A. F. B., van Leeuwen, P. & Verstegen, M. W. A. (1990). Comparison of growth, nitrogen metabolism and organ weights in piglets and rats fed on diets containing Phaseolus vulgaris beans. British Journal of Nutrition 64, 743–753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kakade, M. L., Rackis, J. J., McGhee, J. E. & Puski, G. (1974). Determination of trypsin inhibitor activity of soy products: collaborative analysis of an improved procedure. Cereal Chemistry 51, 376–382.Google Scholar
Khayambashi, H. & Lyman, R. L. (1966). Growth depression and pancreatic and intestinal changes in rats force-fed amino acid diets containing soybean trypsin inhibitor. Journal of Nutrition 89, 455–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, T. P., Begbie, R. & Cadenhead, A. (1983). Nutritional toxicity of raw kidney beans in pigs. Immunocytochemical and cytopathological studies on the gut and the pancreas. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 1404–1412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liener, I. E. & Kakade, M. L. (1980). Protease inhibitors. In Toxic Constituents of Plant Foodstuffs, pp. 7 71 [Liener, I. E., editor]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Liener, I. E., Nitsan, Z., Srisangnam, C., Rackis, J. J. & Gumbmann, M. R. (1985). The USDA trypsin inhibitor study. II. Timed related biochemical changes in the pancreas of rats. Qualitas Plantarum: Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 35, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NEN 3326 (1966). Onderzoeksmethoden voor veevoeders. Bepaling van het gehalte aan ruwe celstof volgens de verkorte methode.Google Scholar
Pusztai, A. (1985). Constraints on the nutritional utilization of plant proteins. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 55, 363–369.Google Scholar
Pusztai, A. (1989). Biological effects of dietary lectins. In Recent Advances in Research on Antinutritional Factors in Legume Seeds, pp. 17–29 [Huisman, J., van der Poel, A. F. B. and Liener, I. E., editors]. Wageningen, The Netherlands: PUDOC.Google Scholar
Pusztai, A., Clarke, E. M. W., Grant, G. & King, T. P. (1981). The toxicity of Phaseolus vulgaris lectins. Nitrogen and immunochemical studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 32, 1037–1046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdebouze, P., Bergezon, E., Gaborit, T. & Delort-Laval, J. (1980). Content and distribution of trypsin inhibitors and haemagglutinins in some legume seeds. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 60, 695–701.Google Scholar