Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:28:20.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of iron supplements on pregnancy in rats given a low-zinc diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Susan J. Fairweather-Talt ,
Viv Payne  and
Christine M. Willians
Susan J. Fairweather-Talt
Affiliation:
AFRC Food Research Institute, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UA
Viv Payne
Affiliation:
AFRC Food Research Institute, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UA
Christine M. Willians
Affiliation:
North East Surrey College of Technology, Reigate Road, Ewell, Surrey KT17 3DS
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Female Wistar rats were given an adequate-zinc (60 μg/g) or low-Zn (7 μg/g) diet for a minimum of 2 weeks and then mated. They were then either continued on the same diets (+Zn –Fe or –Zn –Fe) or given similar diets supplemented with four times the normal level of iron (+Zn + Fe or –Zn + Fe). The day before parturition they were killed and the fetuses removed and analysed.

2. There were no differences in numbers of fetuses or the number of resorption sites. In the absence of Fe supplementation, the mean fetal wet weight was significantly less (P < 0.05) in the low-Zn group but there was no effect of Zn in the two Fe-supplemented groups. The addition of Fe significantly decreased (P < 0.05) the mean fetal wet weight in the adequate-Zn groups but had no effect in the low-Zn groups. There were no differences in fetal dry weight, fat, protein or DNA content. Both Fe-supplemented groups produced fetuses of higher Fe concentration (P < 0.01), and mothers with higher bone Fe-concentration (P < 0.01) compared with the non-supplemented groups. The low-Zn groups produced fetuses of lower Zn concentration (P < 0,001) than the adequate-Zn groups but there was no effect on maternal bone Zn concentration.

3. It was concluded that Fe-supplements did not adversely affect fetal growth from mothers given a low-Zn diet, but the addition of Zn to the unsupplemented diet increased fetal wet weight. These findings were not accompanied by any other differences in fetal composition or dry weight, and do not therefore lend support to the suggestion of an Fe-Zn interaction.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , July 1984 , pp. 79 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1984

References

REFERENCES

Anscombe, F. J. (1960). Technometrics 2, 123–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apgar, J. (1968). American Journal of Physiology 215, 160–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunnane, S. C. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 47, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofert, J. F. & White, A. (1968). Endocrinology 82, 767–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, R. W., Matthew, W. T. & Dubowic, D. A. (1970). Analytical Biochemistry 38, 190–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurley, L. S. (1969). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 22, 1332–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, N. J., Ruse, W., Smith, M. F., Day, J., Keeling, P. W. N., Scopes, J. W., Thompson, R. P. H. & Bloxam, D. L. (1981). Lancet ii, 1135–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1974). Report of the Food and Nutrition Board, 8th ed. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
O'Dell, B. L., Burpo, C. E. & Savage, J. E. (1972). Journal of Nutrition 102, 653–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956). Non-parametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, p. 202. Kogakusha: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1957 a). Statistical Methods, 5th ed., p. 97. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1957 b). Statistical Methods, 5th ed., p. 287. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Solomons, N. W. & Jacob, R. A. (1981). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 34, 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of california (1981). In BMDP Statistical Software [Dixon, W. J., editor]. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. (1968). Biology of Gestation, vol. 2, pp. 1–49. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Williams, R. B., Demertzis, P. & Mills, C. F. (1973). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 32, 3A–4A.Google Scholar
Williams, R. B. & Mills, C. F. (1970). British Journal of Nutrition 24, 989–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar