Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:07:26.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of heat on amino acids for growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. J. Van Barneveld ,
E. S. Batterham  and
B. W. Norton
R. J. Van Barneveld
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture, Wollongbar Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2477, Australia
E. S. Batterham
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture, Wollongbar Agricultural Institute, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2477, Australia
B. W. Norton
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Three experiments were conducted to examine the effect of heating field peas (Pisum sativum cultivar Dundale) on (1) proximate analysis and total amino acid composition, (2) ileal and faecal digestibilities of amino acids, and (3) digestible energy content. Alternative techniques for assessing ileal and faecal digestibilities and digestible energy respectively, were also investigated. Forced-air dehydrators were used to heat field peas at temperatures of 110°, 135°, 150° or 165°. In the first experiment the apparent ileal and faecal digestibilities of amino acids and the faecal digestibility of energy in the raw and heated field peas were determined using pigs fitted with ‘T’ -shaped cannulas. In the second, apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids and the faecal digestibility of energy were determined using the direct ileal and rectal sampling technique. This involved a single collection of digesta and faeces from the digestive tract of the pig while it was anaesthetized. The faecal digestibilities of amino acids and energy were determined using total faeces collection in the third experiment. In all experiments the respective field-pea treatments comprised 400 g/kg sugar-based diets and were the only source of amino acids. Heat significantly decreased the lysine (14.6–8.7 g/kg; P < 0.001), cystine (3.2–2.6 g/kg; P < 0.01) and arginine (16.7–14.5 g/kg; P < 0.05) contents of the heated peas. The ‘reactive’ lysine content of the field peas, as measured using the Silcock technique, was decreased by 0.11 and 0.30 with the application of heat at 150° and 165° respectively. Heat treatments did not alter the ileal digestibility of most amino acids. Only aspartic acid (0.72–0.58), glutamic acid (0.80–0.65) and the basic amino acids, lysine (0.79–0.56) and arginine (0.85–0.75), showed a significant linear decrease (P < 0.05) in ileal digestibility over the heat treatments, determined using the ileal cannulation procedure. Heating significantly (P < 0.05) decreased faecal digestibility for all amino acids. Faecal digestibility was consistently greater than ileal digestibility for the raw field peas; however, this difference decreased with heat application until faecal digestibility was equal or less than ileal digestibility at the 165° treatment. Heat linearly depressed digestible energy, diet dry-matter digestibility and diet energy digestibility. Losses in lysine, cystine and arginine are likely to be due to early and advanced Maillard reactions. Considerable binding of the remaining lysine also occurred as indicated by a decline in Silcock-reactive lysine. The results indicate that the direct ileal sampling technique is a viable alternative to the cannulation procedure for amino acids, but further method development is required to decrease the variability associated with measurements. The estimation of faecal digestibility using indigestible markers and the partial faeces collection technique was as efficient as total faeces collection. In general, ileal digestibility of amino acids showed little response to heating, however, any changes that were observed were greatest for lysine. In contrast, faecal digestibility of all amino acids was greatly reduced with increasing heat application. This response appeared to be largely due to the effect of heating on microbial degradation and synthesis of amino acids in the hind-gut, rather than a reflection of the changes within the protein induced by heating. This variable response makes faecal digestibility an unreliable estimator of amino acid ileal digestibility.

Keywords

Ileal digestibilityFaecal digestibilityAmino acidsField peasPigs
Type
Ileal digestion of heat-treated amino acids
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , August 1994 , pp. 221 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1994

References

REFERENCES

Asquith, R. S. & Leon, N. H. (1977). Chemical reactions of keratin fibers. In The Chemistry of Natural Protein Fibres, pp. 193–265 [Asquith, R. S., editor]. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1984). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 14th ed. Washington DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Batterham, E. S., Andersen, L. M., Baigent, D. R., Beech, S. A. & Elliott, R. (1990). Utilization of ileal digestible amino acids by pigs: lysine. British Journal of Nutrition 64, 679–690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterham, E. S., Andersen, L. M., Burnham, B. V. & Taylor, G. A. (1986 a). Effect of heat on the nutritional value of lupin (Lupinus angustifo1ius)-seed meal for growing pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 169–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterham, E. S., Andersen, L. M., Lowe, R. F. & Darnell, R. E. (1986 b). Nutritional value of lupin (Lupinus albus)-seed meal for growing pigs: availability of lysine, effect of autoclaving and net energy content. British Journal of Nutrition 56, 645–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterham, E. S., Darnell, R. E., Herbert, L. S. & Major, E. J. (1986 c). Effect of pressure and temperature on the availability of lysine in meat-and-bone meal as determined by slope-ratio assays with growing pigs, rats and chicks, and by chemical techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 441–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterham, E. S., Murison, R. D. & Andersen, L. M. (1984). Availability of lysine in vegetable protein concentrates as determined by the slope-ratio assay with growing pigs and rats, and by chemical techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 51, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterham, E. S., Murison, R. D. & Lewis, C. E. (1979). Availability of lysine in protein concentrates as determined by the slope-ratio assay with growing pigs and rats, and by chemical techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 41, 383–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterham, E. S., Murison, R. D. & Lowe, R. F. (1981). Availability of lysine in vegetable protein concentrates as determined by the slope-ratio assay with growing pigs and rats, and by chemical techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 45, 401–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellaver, C. & Easter, R. A. (1989). Performance of pigs fed diets formulated on the basis of amino acid digestibility. Journal of Animal Science 67, Suppl., 241.Google Scholar
Bjarason, J. & Carpenter, K. J. (1970). Mechanisms of heat damage in proteins. 2. Chemical changes in pure proteins. British Journal of Nutrition 24, 313–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broderick, G. A. & Craig, W. M. (1980). Effect of heat treatment on ruminal degradation and escape, and intestinal digestibility of cottonseed meal protein. Journal of Nutrition 110, 2381–2389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, K. J. (1960). The estimation of available lysine in animal-protein foods. Biochemical Journal 77, 604–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carpenter, K. J. (1973). Damage to lysine in food processing: its measurement and its significance. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 43, 424–451.Google Scholar
Chalupa, W. (1975). Rumen bypass and protection of proteins and amino acids. Journal of Dairy Science 58, 1198–1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Lange, C. F. M., Souffrant, W. B. & Sauer, W. C. (1990). Real ileal protein and amino acid digestibilities in feedstuffs for growing pigs as determined with the 15N-isotope dilution technique. Journal of Animal Science 68, 409–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggum, B. O. (1973). A study of certain factors influencing protein digestibility in rats and pigs. PhD Thesis, Institute of Animal Science, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Erbersdobler, H. F. (1977). The biological significance of carbohydratelysine crosslinking during heat-treatment of food proteins. In Symposium on Protein Crosslinking: Nutritional and Medical Consequences, pp. 367–378 [Friedman, M., editor]. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbersdobler, H. F., Gross, A., Klusman, U. & Schlecht, K. (1989). Absorption and metabolism of heated protein-carbohydrate mixtures in humans. In Absorption and Utilization of Amino Acids, Vol. 3, pp. 91–102 [M.Friedman, editor]. Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1964). Statistical Method in Biological Assay, 2nd ed. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1973). The Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Sulfhydryl Group in Amino Acids, Peptides and Proteins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. H. G., Bayley, H. S., Leadbeater, P. A. & Horney, F. D. (1974). Digestion of protein in the small and large intestine of the pig. British Journal of Nutrition 32, 479–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurrell, R. F. & Carpenter, K. J. (1977). Nutritional significance of crosslink formation during food processing.In Symposium on Protein Crosslinking: Nutritional and Medical Consequences, pp. 225–238 [Friedman, M., editor]. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, R. F., Carpenter, K. J., Sinclair, W. J., Otterburn, M. S. & Asquith, R. S. (1976). Mechanisms of heat damage in proteins. 7. The significance of lysine-containing isopeptides and of lanthionine in heated proteins. British Journal of Nutrition 35, 383–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jagger, S. (1987). Ileal digestibility of pig diets. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, H., Fernandez, J. A. & Just, A. (1985). Relation between ileal and faecal digestible nutrients in 96 diets.In Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Digestive Physiology in the Pig, pp. 352–355 [Just, A., Jorgensen, H. and Fernandez, J. A., editors]. Copenhagen: National Institute of Animal Science.Google Scholar
Just, A., Jorgensen, H. & Fernandez, J. A. (1985). Correlations of protein deposited in growing female pigs to ileal and faecal digestible crude protein and amino acids. Livestock Production Science 12, 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, F. T. & Miller, V. 1. (1957). Improved determination of chromic oxide in cow feed and faeces. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 5, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Low, A. G. (1990). Protein evaluation in pigs and poultry. In Feedstuff Evaluation, pp. 91–114 [Wiseman, J. and Cole, D. J. A., editors]. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, V. C. (1984). Metabolism of nitrogenous compounds in the large gut. Proceedings ofthe Nutrition Society 43, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, E. L., Hartley, A. W. & Thomas, D. C. (1965). Availability of sulphur amino acids in protein foods. 4. Effect of heat treatment upon total amino acid content of cod muscle. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 565–573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moughan, P. J. & Smith, W. C. (1987). A note on the effect of cannulation of the terminal ileum of the growing pig on the apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in ground barley. Animal Production 44, 319–321.Google Scholar
Moughan, P. J., Smith, W. C., Schrama, J. & Smits, C. (1991). Chromic oxide and acid-insoluble ash as faecal markers in digestibility studies with young growing pigs. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, A. G., Sanderson, P. & Williams, D. R. (1967). Comparison of methods for the determination of available lysine value in animal and vegetable protein sources. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 18, 274–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saini, H. S. & Batterham, E.S. (1989). Protease inhibitors in cereals for pigs. In Manipulating Pig Production II. p. 185 [Barnett, J. L. and Hennessy, D. P., editors]. Wembee: Australasian Pig Science Association.Google Scholar
Sauer, W., Dugan, M., de Lange, K., Imbeah, M. & Mosenthin, R. (1989). Considerations in methodology for the determination of amino acid digestibilities in foodstuffs for pigs. In Absorption and Utilization of Amino Acids, Vol. 3, pp. 217–230 [Friedman, M., editor]. Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Sauer, W. C. & Ozimek, L. (1986). Digestibility of amino acids in swine: results and their practical applications.A review. Livestock Production Science 15, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standing Committee on Agriculture (1987). Feeding Standards for Australian Livestock. Pigs. East Melbourne: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Tanksley, T. D., Knabe, D. A., Purser, K., Zebrowska, T. & Corley, J. R. (1981). Apparent digestibility of amino acids and nitrogen in three cottonseed meals and one soybean meal. Journal of Animal Science 52, 769–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taverner, M. R. & Curic, D. M. (1983). The influence of hind-gut digestion on measures of nutrient availability in pig feeds. In Feed Information and Animal Production, pp. 295–298 [Robards, G. E. and Packham, R. G., editors]. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Varnish, S. A. & Carpenter, K. J. (1975 a). Mechanisms of heat damage in proteins. 5. The nutritional values of heat-damaged and propionylated proteins as sources of lysine, methionine and tryptophan. British Journal of Nutrition 34, 325–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varnish, S. A. & Carpenter, K. J. (1975 b). Mechanisms of heat damage in proteins. 6. The digestibility of individual amino acids in heated and propionylated proteins. British Journal of Nutrition 34, 339–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiseman, J., Jagger, S., Cole, D. J. A. & Haresign, W. (1991). The digestion and utilization of amino acids of heat-treated fish meal by growing/finishing pigs. Animal Production 53, 215–225.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, I. & Buraczewski, S. (1977). Digestibility of amino acids along the gut of pigs. Publications of the European Association of Animal Production, 1977 22, 82–85.Google Scholar