Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T03:41:56.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of dietary protein level on some key enzymes of the tryptophan-NAD pathway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2018

U. Satyanarayana  and
B. S. Narasinga Rao
U. Satyanarayana
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Jamai-Osmania, Hyderabad-500 007, India
B. S. Narasinga Rao
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Jamai-Osmania, Hyderabad-500 007, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

  1. 1. Six groups of rats were given diets containing protein at three levels (SO, 100 and 200 g/kg), with and without nicotinic acid. After 4 weeks on these diets some key enzymes of the tryptophan and nicotinic acid-NAD pathway, liver nicotinamide nucleotide concentration, and urinary metabolites of tryptophan and nicotinic acid were studied.

  2. 2. Liver nicotinamide nucleotide levels were lower in rats given the diet with 50 g protein/kg as compared to those in rats given diets with 100 and 200 g protein/kg. The addition of nicotinic acid to the diet resulted in a significant increase in the levels of nicotinamide nucleotides only in rats given 50 g protein/kg diet but not in those given either 100 or 200 g protein/kg diet.

  3. 3. Liver tryptophan oxygenase (EC 1.13.1.12) activity increased with increasing dietary protein level. Nicotinic acid in the diet had no effect on its activity.

  4. 4. Quinolinate phosphoribosyltransferase (EC 2.4.2.a) activity in liver was inversely related to dietary protein level, and nicotinic acid in the diet had no effect on its activity.

  5. 5. Liver nicotinate phosphoribosyltransferase (EC 2.4.2.11) activity and kidney picolinate carboxylase (EC 4.1.1.45) activity were not altered either by dietary protein level or nicotinic acid in the diet.

  6. 6. The addition of nicotinic acid to the diet resulted in increased excretion of W-methylnicotinamide at all dietary protein levels.

  7. 7. The inverse relationship between protein level in the diet and liver quinolinate phosphoribosyltransferase activity, the rate-limiting enzyme of the tryptophan-NAD pathway suggests that the efficiency of conversion of tryptophan to NAD is related to protein level in the diet, the efficiency decreasing with an increase in the level of dietary protein.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , July 1977 , pp. 39 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1977

References

Anasuya, A. & Narasinga Rao, B. S. (1975). Biochem. Med. 12, 365.Google Scholar
Bhan, A. K. & Venkitasubramanian, T. A. (1965). Indian J. Biochem. 2, 41.Google Scholar
Brown, R. R., Vivian, V. M., Reynolds, M. S. & Price, J. M. (1958). J. Nulr. 66, 599.Google Scholar
Carpenter, K. J. & Kodicek, E. (1950). Biochem. J. 46, 421.Google Scholar
Chiancone, F. M. (1965). In Newer Methods in Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 2, p. 249 [A. Albanese, editor]. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Freed, M. (1966). In Methods of Vitamin Assay, 3rd ed., p. 169 [Association of Official Vitamin Chemists, editors]. New York: Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar
Ghafoorunissa, & Narasinga Rao, B. S. (1973). Biochem. J. 134, 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghafoorunissa, & Narasinga Rao, B. S. (1974). Life Sci. 15, 1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gholson, R. K., Ueda, I., Ogasawara, N. & Henderson, L. M. (1963). J. biol. Chem. 239, 1208.Google Scholar
Henderson, L. M. (1949). J. biol. Chem. 181, 677.Google Scholar
Horwitt, M. K., Harvey, C. C., Rothwell, W. S., Cutler, J. L. & Haffron, D. (1956). J. Nutr. 60, Suppl. 1,1.Google Scholar
Ikeda, M., Tsuji, H., Nakamura, S., Ichiyama, A., Nishizuka, Y. & Hayaishi, O. (1965). J. biol. Chem. 240, 1395.Google Scholar
Ismande, J. (1964). Biochim. biophys. Acta 85, 255.Google Scholar
Knox, W. E. (1966). In Advances in Enzyme Regulation, vol. 4, p. 287 [G. Weber, editor]. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Knox, W. E. & Mehler, A. H. (1951). Science, N. Y. 113, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitas, M., Robinson, J., Rosen, F., Huff, J. W. & Perlzweig, W. A. (1947). J. biol. Chem. 167, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. & Randall, R. J. (1951). J. biol. Chem. 193, 265.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, I., Takahashi, T., Suzuki, T. & Masana, Y. (1969). J. Nutr. 99, 325.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council (1963). Rep. nam. Acad. Sci., Wash. no. 1100.Google Scholar
Nishizuka, Y. & Hayaishi, O. (1963). J. biol. Chem. 238, 3369.Google Scholar
Nishizuka, Y. & Nakamura, S. (1970). Meth. Enzym. 17A, 491.Google Scholar
Oser, B. L. (editor) (1965). In Hawk's Physiological Chemistry, 14th ed., p. 1233. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
U.S. Pharmacoepia XVII (1965). p. 862.Google Scholar