Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:17:14.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of dietary protein level and thyroxine on vitamin A absorption and on plasma proteins in chicks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

I. Nir  and
I. Ascarelli
I. Nir
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Agricultural Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University, Rehovot, Israel
I. Ascarelli
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Agricultural Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University, Rehovot, Israel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The effect of dietary protein level and supplementation with thyroxine on the liver storage of vitamin A, on the fraction of liver vitamin A in the alcohol form, and on the plasma levels of vitamin A and proteins has been studied in chicks.

2. Liver storage was reduced by lowering the dietary protein level.

3. Protein restriction lowered the percentage of vitamin A found in the liver as retinol.

4. Thyroxine increased both vitamin A storage and the fraction of the total vitamin A as retinol, this effect being dependent on dietary protein level.

5. Plasma vitamin A and plasma protein contents were lowered to a highly significant extent by protein restriction. This drop was essentially caused by reduction of the albumin fraction in chicks fed on a 5% protein diet and by a reduction of β- and γ-globulins in chicks fed on a 10% protein diet.

6. Thyroxine supplementation of the diet lowered to a highly significant extent plasma protein content; this reduction was caused by a dramatic fall in the level of plasma albumin. The β- and γ-globulins were concomitantly increased.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 1967 , pp. 167 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1967

References

Ascarelli, I. & Bartov, I. (1963). Poult. Sci. 42, 232.Google Scholar
Ascarelli, I., Budowski, P., Nir, I. & Bondi, A. (1964). Poult. Sci. 43, 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, N.M. & De, N. K. (1941). Sci. Cult. 6, 672.Google Scholar
Baumann, C. A., Foster, E. G. & Moore, P. R. (1942). J. biol. Chem. 142, 597.Google Scholar
Deshmukh, D. S., Malathi, P. & Ganguly, J. (1964). Biochem. J. 90, 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durié, D. S., Micié, J. V. & Simié, N. (1963). Acta med. iugosl. 27, 37.Google Scholar
Esh, G. C., Bhattacharya, S. & Som, J. M. (1960). Ann. Biochem. exp. Med. 20, 15.Google Scholar
Federer, W. T. (1955). Experimental Design. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Garbers, C. F., Gillman, J. & Peisach, M. (1960). Biochem. J. 75, 124.Google Scholar
Glover, J. & Walker, R. J. (1964). Exp. Eye Res. 3, 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagannathan, S. N. & Patwardhan, V. N. (1960). Indian J. med. Res. 48, 785.Google Scholar
Kekki, M. (1964). Acta Endocr. Helsinki 46, Suppl.91.Google Scholar
Krinsky, N. I., Cornwell, D. G. & Oncley, J. L. (1958). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 73, 233.Google Scholar
Miller, L. L., Hanavan, H. R., Titthasiri, N. & Chowdhury, A. (1964). Adv. Chem. Ser. 44, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nir, I. & Ascarelli, I. (1966 a). Br. J. Nutr. 20, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nir, I. & Ascarelli, I. (1966 b). Br. Poult. Sci. 7, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slavnov, V. N. (1962). Vopr. Sovrem Khirurgii Sb. p. 104. Quoted in Chem. Abstr. (1964), 60, 12338.Google Scholar
Stas, J., Grabski, J. & Masny, N. (1962). Endokr. pol. 13, 433.Google Scholar
Sturkie, P. D. (1951). Endocrinology 49, 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar