Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:59:12.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of concentration of tannin-rich bean hulls (Vicia faba L.) on activities of lipase (EC 3.1.1.3) and α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) in digesta and pancreas and on the digestion of lipid and starch by young chicks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

M. A. Longstaff  and
J. M. McNab
M. A. Longstaff
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
J. M. McNab
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research, Edinburgh Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effect of different concentrations of tannin-rich field-bean (Vicia faba L.) hulls at 0, 20, 50, 150 and 300 g/kg dietary inclusion on the activities of lipase (EC 3.1.1.3) and α-amylase (EC 3.2.1.1) in digesta and pancreas and on the digestion of lipid and starch was studied in 2–3-week-old male broiler chicks. Low dietary concentrations of tannins (20 and 50 g hulls/kg) enhanced the activity of lipase in digesta from both the jejunum and ileum, the 20 g hulls/kg effecting the greatest enhancement, but no stimulatory effect on the activity of digesta α-amylase was observed. High dietary concentrations of tannins (150 and 300 g hulls/kg) inhibited both lipase and α-amylase activities in digesta from both the jejunum and ileum, the 30 g hulls/kg causing the most inhibition. Tannins did not increase the activities of lipase or α-amylase in pancreatic homogenates, but at high concentrations (150 and 300 g hulls/kg) they lowered slightly the pancreatic activity of α-amylase. Nutrient digestion was less influenced by the concentration of tannins than digesta enzyme activities.

Keywords

TanninsDigestive enzymesNutrient digestionChick
Type
Effects of Milk on Plasma Lipids
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 66 , Issue 1 , July 1991 , pp. 139 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1991

References

REFERENCES

Antoniou, T. & Marquardt, R. R. (1981). Influence of rye pentosans on the growth of chicks. Poultry Science 60, 1898–1904.Google Scholar
Bernays, A. (1981). Plant tannins and insect herbivores: An appraisal. Ecological Entomology 6, 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broz, J. & Frigg, M. (1986). Effects of beta-glucanase on the feeding value of broiler diets based on barley or oats. Archiv für Geflugelkunde 50, 41–47.Google Scholar
Butler, L. G., Price, M. L. & Brotherton, J. E. (1982). Vanillin assay for proanthocyanidins (condensed tannins): Modification of the solvent for estimation of the degree of polymerisation. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 30, 1087–1089.Google Scholar
Classen, H. L., Campbell, G. L., Rossagel, B. G., Bhatty, R. & Reichert, R. D. (1985). Studies on the use of hullless barley in chick diets: deleterious effects and methods of alleviation. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 65, 725–733.Google Scholar
European Communities (1971). IV Determination of crude oils and fats. Process A. Part 18, Animal Feedingstuffs, pp. 15–19. London: HM Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Graham, H., Hesselman, K. & Aman, P. (1986). The influence of wheat bran and sugar-beet pulp on the digestibility of dietary components in a cereal-based pig diet. Journal of Nutrition 116, 242–251.Google Scholar
Griffiths, D. W. (1979). The inhibition of digestive enzymes by extracts of field beans (Vicia faba). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30, 458–462.Google Scholar
Griffiths, D. W. & Moseley, G. (1980). The effect of diets containing field beans of high and low polyphenolic content on the activity of digestive enzymes in the intestine of rats. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 255–259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hibberd, C. A., Wagner, D. G., Hintz, R. L. & Griffin, D. D. (1985). Effect of sorghum grain variety and reconstitution on site and extent of starch and protein digestion in steers. Journal of Animal Science 61, 702–712.Google Scholar
Horigome, T., Kumar, R. & Okamoto, K. (1988). Effects of condensed tannins prepared from leaves of fodder plants on digestive enzymes in vitro and in the intestine of rats. British Journal of Nutrition 60, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isaksson, G., Lundquist, I. & Ihse, I. (1982). Effect of dietary fiber on pancreatic enzyme, activity in vitro. Gastroenterology 82, 918–924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, W. T. & Mangan, J. L. (1977). Complexes of the condensed tannins of Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) with Fraction 1 leaf protein and with submaxillary mucoprotein and their reversal by polyethylene glycol and pH. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 126–136.Google Scholar
Kakade, M. L., Barton, T. L., Schaible, P. J. & Evan, R. J. (1967). Biochemical changes in the pancreas of chicks fed raw soybeans and soybean meal. Poultry Science 46, 1578–1585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konijin, A. M., Birk, Y. & Guggenheim, K. (1970). Pancreatic enzyme pattern in rats as affected by dietary soybean flour. Journal of Nutrition 100, 361–368.Google Scholar
Leone, J. L. (1973). Collaborative study of the quantitative determination of titanium dioxide in cheese. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 56, 535–537.Google ScholarPubMed
Lever, M. (1972). A new reaction for colorimetric determination of carbohydrates. Analytical Biochemistry, 47, 273–279.Google Scholar
Lindgren, E. (1975). The nutritive value of peas and beans for hens. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 5, 159–161.Google Scholar
Longstaff, M. A. & McNab, J. M. (1991). The inhibitory effects of hull polysaccharides and tannins of field beans (Vicia faba L.) on the digestion of amino acids, starch and lipid and on digestive enzyme activities in young chicks. British Journal of Nutrition 65, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkar, H. P. S., Singh, B. & Dawra, R. K. (1988). Effect of tannin-rich leaves of oak (Quercus incana) on various microbial enzyme activities of the bovine rumen. British Journal of Nutrition 60, 287–296.Google Scholar
Marquardt, R. R., Ward, A. T., Campbell, L. D. & Cansfield, P. E. (1977). Purification, identification and characterization of a growth inhibitor in faba beans (Vicia faba L. var. minor). Journal of Nutrition 107, 1313–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Tanguy, J., Guillaume, J. & Kossa, A. (1977). Condensed tannins in horse bean seed: chemical structure and apparent effect on poultry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 757–765.Google Scholar
Mole, S. & Waterman, P. G. (1985). Stimulatory effects of tannins and cholic acid on tryptic hydrolysis of proteins: Ecological implications. Journal of Chemical Ecology 11, 1323–1332.Google Scholar
Peddie, J., Dewar, W. A., Gilbert, A. B. & Waddington, D. (1982). The use of titanium dioxide for determining apparent digestibility in mature domestic fowls (Gallus domesticus). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 233–236.Google Scholar
Rostagno, H. S., Rogler, J. C. & Featherston, W. R. (1973). Studies on the nutritional value of sorghum grains with varying tannin contents for chicks. 2. Amino acid digestibility studies. Poultry Science 52, 772–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneeman, B. O. (1978). Effect of plant fiber on lipase, trypsin and chymotrypsin activity. Journal of Food Science 43, 634–635.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1976). Statistical Methods, 6th ed., p. 324. Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar