Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T08:56:18.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early changes in enzyme activity during the development of and recovery from vitamin D deficiency in the rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Elisabeth M. Cheesman ,
Alice M. Copping  and
Patricia M. Prebble
Elisabeth M. Cheesman
Affiliation:
Departments of Nutrition and Physiology, Queen Elizabeth College, University of London, Campden Hill Road, London, W 8
Alice M. Copping
Affiliation:
Departments of Nutrition and Physiology, Queen Elizabeth College, University of London, Campden Hill Road, London, W 8
Patricia M. Prebble
Affiliation:
Departments of Nutrition and Physiology, Queen Elizabeth College, University of London, Campden Hill Road, London, W 8
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Rats were given a rachitogenic diet with or without vitamin D for 1, 2, 3 or 4 weeks, and vitamin D was administered to a group of rats which had been deprived of vitamin D for 3 weeks. 2. Changes in enzyme activities of some tissues were followed histochemically. In general, changes in parathyroid preceded those in gut and kidney. Leucine aminopeptidase activity rose in the parathyroid, kidney and jejunum of the vitamin D-deficient rat as did the ribonucleic acid content of the parathyroid and the dehydrogenase activity of the gut. In contrast, the phosphatase activity of the gut and kidney fell in the vitamin D-deficient rat. All these changes were reversed during the 1-week recovery period. 3. A slower response of bones to both vitamin D deprivation and vitamin D dosage after deprivation was indicated by the changes in the percentages of ash in the bones and the changes in number and distribution of osteoclasts.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 1966 , pp. 413 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

REFERENCES

Balogh, K. Jr. (1962). J. Histochem. Cytochem. 10, 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheesman, E. M., Copping, A. M. & Prebble, P. M. (1964). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, E. M., Pickersgill, M. & Gaffikin, M. M. (1932). Biochem. J. 26, 488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodicek, E., Cruickshank, E. M., DeLuca, H. F. & Raisz, L. G. (1964). In Bone and Tooth, p. 363. [Blackwood, H. J. J., editor.] Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Patt, H. M. & Luckhardt, A. B. (1942). Endocrinology 31, 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E. (1960). Histochemistry, 2nd ed. London: J. and A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, H., DeLuca, H., Arnaud, C., Hawker, C. & von Stedingk, M. (1963). J. clin. Invest. 42, 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmage, R. V. & Toft, R. J. (1961). In The Parathyroids, p. 224. [Greep, R. O. and Talmage, R. V., editors.] Springfield: C. C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Toverud, S. U. (1964 a). Acta physiol. scand. 62, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toverud, S. U. (1964 b). Acta physiol. scand. 62, Suppl.234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar