Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:48:37.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The diets of pregnant and post-pregnant women in different social groups in London and Edinburgh: energy, protein, fat and fibre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Claire Schofield ,
Erica Wheeler  and
Judy Stewart
Claire Schofield
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT
Erica Wheeler
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT
Judy Stewart
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Dietary records were obtained twice in pregnancy and once post-partum from 265 women from all social classes in London and Edinburgh.

2. The London women always had higher mean energy, protein, fat and fibre intakes. Significant between-region differences emerged.

3. Some between-social classes differences occurred, but were not consistently significant.

4. All mean energy and fibre intakes were lower, and protein and fat intakes were higher, than current recommendations.

5. Of lactating women 15% claimed to be dieting.

6. The percentage dietary energy derived from fat varied from 36 (in a dieting group) to 42.

Type
Clinical and Human Nutrition papers: Studies in Man
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , November 1987 , pp. 369 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1987

References

REFERENCES

Abraham, R., Campbell-Brown, M., Haines, A. P., North, W. R. S., Hainsworth, V. & McFadyen, I. R. (1985). Human Nutrition: Applied Nutrition 39A, 23–35.Google Scholar
Black, A. E., Wiles, S. J. & Paul, A. A. (1986). British Journal of Nutrition 56, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransby, E. R., Daubney, C. G. & King, J. (1944). British Journal of Nutrition 2, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, N. L. (1985). Human Nutrition: Applied Nutrition 39A Suppl.Google Scholar
Campbell-Brown, M. (1982). Proceedings of the Tenth Study Group of the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. London: Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.Google Scholar
Campbell-Brown, M., Johnstone, F. D. & Grieve, J. F. K. (1986). Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 45, 90A.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1979). Report on Health and Social Subjects no. 15. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security (1984). Diet and Cardiovascular Disease, Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy. Report of the Panel on Diet in Relation to Cardiovascular Disease. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Doyle, W., Crawford, M. A., Laurance, B. M. & Drury, P. (1982). Human Nutrition: Applied Nutrition 36A, 95–106.Google Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A., Mckillop, F. M., Grant, S. & Fitzgerald, G. (1985). Lancet ii, 823–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization/United Nations University. (1985). Technical Report Series no. 724. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Marr, J. W. (1971). World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 13, 105–164.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1985). Annual Report of the National Food Survey Committee (1983). London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
National Advisory Committee on Nutrition Education (1983). Proposals for Nutritional Guidelines for Health Education in Britain. London: Health Education Council.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1980). Classification of Occupations. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1981). Regional Trends 1979–80. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1984). OPCS Monitor DH3 84/6. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1985). OPCS Monitor DH3 85/5. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Paul, A. A. & Southgate, D. A. T. (1978). McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. London: H.M. Stationery Office and Elsevier/North Holland, Biomedical Press.Google Scholar
Paul, A. A., Southgate, D. A. T. & Russell, J. (1980). First Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Pickard, B. M. (1983). Nutrition and Food Science January/February, 20–22.Google Scholar
Schofield, E. C., Wheeler, E. F. & Stewart, J. (1987). Human Nutrition: Applied Nutrition (In the Press).Google Scholar
Smithells, R. W., Ankers, C., Carver, M. E., Lennon, D., Schorah, C. J. & Sheppard, S. (1977). British Journal of Nutrition 38, 497–506.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods, 6th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. M. (1959). British Journal of Nutrition 13, 190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. M., Hytten, F. E. & Bilewicz, W. Z. (1970). British Journal of Nutrition 24, 565–572.Google Scholar
Whitehead, R. G., Paul, A. A., Black, A. E. & Wiles, S. J. (1981). Food and Nutrition Bulletin Suppl. 5, 259–265.Google Scholar