CHD may be largely preventable through optimisation of dietary intake, in addition to maintaining a healthy weight, regular exercise and avoiding tobacco (Hu & Willett, Reference Hu and Willett2002). Investigations of the role of diet in chronic disease have increasingly focused on the role of overall dietary intake (Hu, Reference Hu2002; Kris-Etherton et al. Reference Kris-Etherton, Etherton, Carlson and Gardner2002; Newby & Tucker, Reference Newby and Tucker2004). Dietary patterns, defined as multiple dietary components operationalised as a single exposure (Kant, Reference Kant2004; Schulze & Hoffmann, Reference Schulze and Hoffmann2006), may be derived from existing data (a posteriori) using factor or cluster analysis, describing actual patterns of dietary intake captured by FFQ. Alternatively, adherence to dietary patterns defined a priori may be measured with dietary indices. Defining dietary patterns a priori allows for testing of putative optimal dietary patterns, such as the Alternate Healthy Eating Index (McCullough et al. Reference McCullough, Feskanich, Stampfer, Giovannucci, Rimm, Hu, Spiegelman, Hunter, Colditz and Willett2002; McCullough & Willett, Reference McCullough and Willett2006), which are not necessarily derived using a posteriori methods. Both approaches have been used to study the role of diet in CHD, generally finding that a prudent dietary pattern is associated with a reduced risk of CHD (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Rimm, Stampfer, Ascherio, Spiegelman and Willett2000; Fung et al. Reference Fung, Willett, Stampfer, Manson and Hu2001) and total mortality (Osler et al. Reference Osler, Heitmann, Gerdes, Jorgensen and Schroll2001).
Studying overall diet as an exposure, rather than individual dietary components such as nutrients or foods, offers advantages including the ability to identify significant cumulative effects which may be too small to detect with isolated dietary components. Interactions among nutrients also contribute to associations detected by dietary pattern analysis, allowing the study of food synergy without specific knowledge of the myriad interactions among known and unknown components of foods (Jacobs & Murtaugh, Reference Jacobs and Murtaugh2000; Messina et al. Reference Messina, Lampe, Birt, Appel, Pivonka, Berry and Jacobs2001; Jacobs & Steffen, Reference Jacobs and Steffen2003). Modelling overall diet further allows for greater ease in translating research findings into dietary recommendations.
Few studies have examined dietary patterns in Norway. A recent investigation (Engeset et al. Reference Engeset, Alsaker, Ciampi and Lund2005) of over 37 000 Norwegian women described several dietary clusters, including two that approximated the prudent and Western patterns found in other populations (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Rimm, Stampfer, Ascherio, Spiegelman and Willett2000; Fung et al. Reference Fung, Willett, Stampfer, Manson and Hu2001). The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) investigators (Engeset et al. Reference Engeset, Alsaker, Ciampi and Lund2005) described regional differences, with the ‘healthy’ and ‘alcohol drinkers’ clusters more highly represented in southeast Norway, the region where cases and controls were recruited for the present study. They also found a ‘fish eaters’ pattern, as well as a ‘bread eaters’ pattern, the latter being particularly rich in coarse bread, though coarse bread intake was far greater in every cluster compared with refined white bread. Whole grains are more commonly eaten than refined grains in Norway, where, according to Food Disappearance data, four times as much whole grain is consumed compared with the USA (Jacobs et al. Reference Jacobs, Meyer and Solvoll2001). An investigation of nearly 17 000 Norwegian men and women found that higher whole-grain consumption was associated with reduced mortality, despite that some wholegrain foods are consumed by most Norwegians (Jacobs et al. Reference Jacobs, Meyer and Solvoll2001).
Our aim in the present investigation was to describe dietary patterns and their association with first myocardial infarction (MI) in a Norwegian case–control study. We first compared risk of MI as determined by food groups alone v. a dietary pattern derived from the same food groups using an a priori healthy diet score. Because our work has shown trans fatty acids to be higher in adipose tissue from cases v. controls (Pedersen et al. Reference Pedersen, Ringstad, Almendingen, Haugen, Stensvold and Thelle2000), we anticipated that margarine consumption, the major source of trans fatty acids at the time of study, would be associated with higher risk.
Subjects and methods
Design and subjects
In this case–control study of first MI (Pedersen et al. Reference Pedersen, Ringstad, Almendingen, Haugen, Stensvold and Thelle2000; Yli-Jama et al. Reference Yli-Jama, Haugen, Rebnord, Ringstad and Pedersen2001, Reference Yli-Jama, Meyer, Ringstad and Pedersen2002; Biong et al. Reference Biong, Veierod, Ringstad, Thelle and Pedersen2006), 111 cases and 107 controls were recruited during 1995 to 1997. Due to missing data, 106 cases and 105 controls were analysed. Study subjects were native Norwegian men and postmenopausal women between the ages of 45 and 75 years, with no history of previously reported MI or other serious disease (including cancer, diabetes, drug abuse or major psychiatric illness) which may have influenced their dietary intake. Subjects using hypolipidaemic drugs or oestrogen replacement therapy, or with changes in body weight of more than 5 kg during the previous year were excluded from the study. Informed consent was obtained for all participants in accordance with the ethical standards set by the committees on human experimentation. Among those asked to participate, 5 % refused.
Cases were diagnosed with a first MI (International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 code 410 with typical history, electrocardiographic and enzyme changes) and admitted within 24 h of symptom onset to the coronary care units of Ullevål University Hospital in Oslo or either of the Ostfold Central Hospitals in Fredrikstad and Sarpsborg. Two cases had angina before MI, but stated that they had not made dietary changes. Interviews generally occurred within 3 d of admission, except in a few cases in which interviewing was delayed until up to 1 week post-admission.
Controls were recruited from the catchment areas of the case hospitals, and frequency matched to correspond to cases for sex, age (5-year intervals) and geographic location; angina pectoris cases were excluded from the control group. As it was thought that population-based samples would result in low response rates that would compromise internal validity, controls were recruited from friends and relatives of the cases, state and municipal employees (excluding doctors and nurses), individuals attending recreation centres for the elderly and retired, and members of associations such as Rotary and Lions Club or church groups. Towards the end of the study, friends and relatives of collaborators were also accepted as controls. This resulted in some controls with higher education. Findings with seventy-seven cases and 102 controls who had at most 16 years of education were similar to those presented here and are not shown. An effort was made to recruit each control within 2 months of the MI event of the corresponding case in order to minimise seasonal variation in reported dietary intake.
Dietary assessment
Dietary intake during the previous 1 year was assessed using a standardised and validated FFQ developed at the Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo (Oslo, Norway). The FFQ was completed during a 90 min interview with each study participant. During interviews with the male patients their spouses or cohabitants were invited to participate. This FFQ had previously been tested in two validation studies, which compared the FFQ with 14 d of weighed diet records and found median nutrient correlations of 0·51 in a study of 125 Norwegian men of median age 38 (Andersen et al. Reference Andersen, Solvoll, Johansson, Salminen, Aro and Drevon1999), and 0·70 in a study of thirty-one Norwegian women of median age 71 (Nes et al. Reference Nes, Frost Andersen, Solvoll, Sandstad, Hustvedt, Lovo and Drevon1992).
The 190 individual food items captured by the FFQ were grouped together in thirty-five non-overlapping food groups consisting of related food items (Table 1). These food groups were defined using grouping criteria similar to those described for other studies of dietary patterns (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Rimm, Stampfer, Ascherio, Spiegelman and Willett2000; Fung et al. Reference Fung, Willett, Stampfer, Manson and Hu2001; Kerver et al. Reference Kerver, Yang, Bianchi and Song2003). Food items were combined into food groups based on similarities such as nutrient content, culinary usage and hypothesised contribution to diet–disease relationships. It should be noted that several single FFQ items (wine, liquor, chicken, salad, nuts, pizza) stand on their own as food groups because no other food items captured by the FFQ were deemed appropriate for combination with these foods into multiple-item food groups. Total energy intake was calculated from FFQ data using the official Norwegian food composition table (National Nutrition Council, 1995).
* The number of FFQ questions contributing to a listed food item is indicated in parentheses; for example, the FFQ had three questions about white cheese indicated by (3) and two questions about brown cheese indicated by (2).
† At the time of the study most margarines contained partially hydrogenated fat (vegetable and marine oils).
Derivation of the a priori healthy diet score
We previously created an a priori diet score by summing rankings of six food groups; high scores corresponded to a healthy diet, i.e. low intake of meat and high intake of each of whole grain, fruit, vegetable, nut, and dairy foods (Steffen et al. Reference Steffen, Kroenke, Yu, Pereira, Slattery, Van Horn, Gross and Jacobs2005). In prediction of incident elevated blood pressure in young adults, the relative hazard for quintile 5 of this score was 0·59 (95 % CI 0·45, 0·76) (Steffen et al. Reference Steffen, Kroenke, Yu, Pereira, Slattery, Van Horn, Gross and Jacobs2005). Elaborating this score in the present study, an a priori healthy diet pattern score was defined as a sum of tertile rankings over twenty-eight of the food groups for which a hypothesis was made that the food group would be generally protective against or would be generally causative of MI. We postulated that results from this score would be similar to those in other studies of dietary patterns and CHD, namely that nutrient-rich plant foods and fish, as they are part of prudent patterns (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Rimm, Stampfer, Ascherio, Spiegelman and Willett2000; Fung et al. Reference Fung, Willett, Stampfer, Manson and Hu2001; Kant, Reference Kant2004; Schulze & Hoffmann, Reference Schulze and Hoffmann2006), would emerge as related to reduced MI risk, while red meats and nutrient-poor plant foods, typical of Western patterns (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Rimm, Stampfer, Ascherio, Spiegelman and Willett2000; Fung et al. Reference Fung, Willett, Stampfer, Manson and Hu2001; Kant, Reference Kant2004; Schulze & Hoffmann, Reference Schulze and Hoffmann2006), would emerge as associated with higher risk. Food groups considered to be generally protective were cheese and yogurt, low-fat dairy (Pereira et al. Reference Pereira, Jacobs, Van Horn, Slattery, Kartashov and Ludwig2002; Steffen et al. Reference Steffen, Kroenke, Yu, Pereira, Slattery, Van Horn, Gross and Jacobs2005), tea (Hertog et al. Reference Hertog, Feskens, Hollman, Katan and Kromhout1993; Peters et al. Reference Peters, Poole and Arab2001, Reference Peters, Poole and Arab2002), wine, beer, liquor (Mukamal et al. Reference Mukamal, Chiuve and Rimm2006), fruit (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Manson, Lee, Cole, Hennekens, Willett and Buring2000; Steffen et al. Reference Steffen, Jacobs, Stevens, Shahar, Carithers and Folsom2003, Reference Steffen, Kroenke, Yu, Pereira, Slattery, Van Horn, Gross and Jacobs2005), wholegrain breads, wholegrain breakfast cereals (Jacobs et al. Reference Jacobs, Meyer, Kushi and Folsom1998), low-fat fish, high-fat fish (Steffen et al. Reference Steffen, Kroenke, Yu, Pereira, Slattery, Van Horn, Gross and Jacobs2005), chicken (Ghosh et al. Reference Ghosh, Bose and Das Chaudhuri2003), non-hydrogenated vegetable oil (Mensink & Katan, Reference Mensink and Katan1989; Estruch et al. Reference Estruch, Martinez-Gonzalez and Corella2006), dressings, mayonnaise, and sauces (Mensink & Katan, Reference Mensink and Katan1989), cruciferous vegetables, tomatoes, salad, other vegetables (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Manson, Lee, Cole, Hennekens, Willett and Buring2000; Steffen et al. Reference Steffen, Jacobs, Stevens, Shahar, Carithers and Folsom2003, Reference Steffen, Kroenke, Yu, Pereira, Slattery, Van Horn, Gross and Jacobs2005), nuts (Mensink & Katan, Reference Mensink and Katan1989; Ghosh et al. Reference Ghosh, Bose and Das Chaudhuri2003; Jiang et al. Reference Ghosh, Bose and Das Chaudhuri2006), and soup (often high in vegetable or fish content in Norway). Eight food groups were hypothesised to contribute to MI risk: high-fat milk (Anderson et al. Reference Anderson, Jacobs, Foster, Hall, Moss, Mojonnier and Blackburn1979; Steffen & Jacobs, Reference Steffen and Jacobs2003), butter and margarine (Pedersen et al. Reference Pedersen, Ringstad, Almendingen, Haugen, Stensvold and Thelle2000), high-energy drinks (Schulze et al. Reference Schulze, Manson, Ludwig, Colditz, Stampfer, Willett and Hu2004), liver (organ meats are particularly high in cholesterol), red and processed meats (Steffen et al. Reference Steffen, Kroenke, Yu, Pereira, Slattery, Van Horn, Gross and Jacobs2005), chips and snacks, sweets, and pizza (foods commonly eaten in obesogenic diets). Not included in the pattern were foods for which hypotheses were ambiguous or which were thought not to be relevant to MI risk: low-energy drinks (Davidson & Swithers, Reference Davidson and Swithers2004), eggs (Nakamura et al. Reference Nakamura, Iso, Kita, Ueshima, Okada, Konishi, Inoue and Tsugane2006; Qureshi et al. Reference Qureshi, Suri, Ahmed, Nasar, Divani and Kirmani2006), fruit juice (beneficial nutrients may be counteracted by high energy content), coffee (Greenland, Reference Greenland1993; Andersen et al. Reference Andersen, Jacobs, Carlsen and Blomhoff2006), refined grains (Jacobs et al. Reference Jacobs, Meyer, Kushi and Folsom1998; Steffen et al. Reference Steffen, Jacobs, Stevens, Shahar, Carithers and Folsom2003), condiments (small absolute intake might counteract high sugar and salt content), and potatoes (beneficial nutrients may be counteracted by preparation method or high starch content).
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software (version 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). In thirty-five separate multivariate logistic regression analyses we examined OR for MI in thirty-five food groups, each represented as a continuous natural logarithmic transformation of g/d intake, in sd units. In addition, we carried out parallel logistic regression analyses with each food group in three categories determined from tertile cut-off points of intake (g/d) within the control group and reported the OR for MI between the highest and lowest intake categories. Because sample size was relatively small, we analysed only one food group or one dietary pattern score in each regression analysis. Covariates in all regression analyses were family history of heart disease in first-degree relatives (yes v. no), current marital or cohabitant status (yes v. no), current smoking (yes v. no), education (four categories), energy intake (kJ/d) and age (years). Note that sex and geographic location were addressed by frequency matching controls to cases. Controls were also frequency matched for age (5-year intervals), and continuous age was also included in our regression model to address the possibility of residual confounding by age. To compute the a priori healthy diet pattern score we summed tertile rankings over the twenty-eight food groups for which a hypothesis about direction of risk was made. First, tertiles of intake, using g/d cut-off points derived from the control group, were assigned values 0 for the lowest, 1 for the middle and 2 for the highest for the twenty food groups assumed to relate inversely to MI. Tertile coding was reversed (2 for the lowest, 1 for the middle and 0 for the highest) for the eight food groups hypothesised to contribute to MI risk. Note that foods are added into the score based on their ranks in the control sample distribution, rather than based on g weight consumed. Distribution of the healthy diet pattern score was considered for cases and controls and logistic regression with the above covariates was used to estimate the OR of MI in categories of the score.
Results
Case (n 106) and control (n 105) participants were of similar age (62·5 (sd 7·7) years in cases and 62·2 (sd 7·7) years in controls), marital status (73 v. 74 % married) and energy intake (9741 (sd 3077) v. 9742 (sd 2903) kJ/d). Cases had higher levels of current smoking (59 v. 19 %), family history of CHD (64 v. 42 %) and waist:hip ratio (0·95 (sd 0·08) v. 0·90 (sd 0·08)); fewer cases had education past high school (24 v. 51 %). As previously reported (Pedersen et al. Reference Pedersen, Ringstad, Almendingen, Haugen, Stensvold and Thelle2000; Yli-Jama et al. Reference Yli-Jama, Meyer, Ringstad and Pedersen2002), cases and controls had similar mean BMI, but cases had higher waist:hip ratio, TAG and history of antihypertensive drug use, but lower levels of HDL-cholesterol and total cholesterol, the latter presumed to represent an acute-phase response (Pedersen et al. Reference Pedersen, Ringstad, Almendingen, Haugen, Stensvold and Thelle2000).
Risk of MI was consistently reduced (Table 2) for the following nutrient-rich plant food groups: tomatoes (OR continuous model 0·53, OR highest intake category 0·38), salad (OR continuous model 0·59, OR highest intake category 0·34) and wholegrain breakfast cereals (OR continuous model 0·64, OR highest intake category 0·38). Cruciferous vegetable intake was also greater in controls, but significantly so only in the continuous model. Intake of other vegetables was nearly significant in both models in the expected direction. Tea intake was higher in controls, though not significant in either model.
* P < 0·05.
† Categories were formed in SAS (version 9.1; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) as tertiles determined within the control group; most contain approximately thirty-five individuals per category. OR are adjusted for age, marital status, education, family history of heart disease, smoking, and energy intake.
‡ sd of in food group intake (g/d).
Wine was significant in both models (OR continuous model 0·58, OR highest intake category 0·27). Beer and liquor lacked statistical significance in their associations with MI but there was a trend toward greater intake in controls. A non-significant reduction was seen for total alcohol intake (data not shown). Few individuals indicated heavy drinking; the median alcohol intake in the highest tertile indicated less than two 15 g drinks/d.
‘Butter and margarine’ was significantly positively associated with the risk of MI in both models (OR continuous model 1·66, OR highest intake category 2·80); in contrast, both non-hydrogenated vegetable oil and high-fat fish intake were greater in controls. High-fat fish included supplemental cod-liver oil, which was consumed by 42 % of the sample; relative risk of MI was 1·90 (95 % CI 0·95, 3·80) in non-users compared with users. Liver was positively associated with MI in both models but did not reach statistical significance.
For several food groups OR were in an unexpected direction. High-fat dairy intake was greater in the controls, significantly so in the categorical model. Cheese and yogurt (both fermented foods high in fat at the time of study) intake was nearly significantly higher in controls in both models. Intake of both pizza and sweets was non-significantly greater in controls. Non-significant associations were detected for all other food groups in both models.
A strong and inverse association was observed between the a priori healthy diet pattern score and risk of MI. Table 3 describes the shape of the association. There were almost no controls with scores < 18. In scores of 18 and above, risk was more gradually graded, such that there were relatively few cases for scores of 28 and above. Adjusted OR compared with the lowest category were below 0·25, generally decreasing as the score increased. Because the lowest category was small in number, we also examined risk for those with a score of < 25, the two lowest categories pooled. Adjusted OR compared with this reference group were 0·5 or less for each higher category. P for trend was 0·004 if the healthy diet pattern was represented as a linear variable. The significant differences observed between the a priori score categories 11–17 and 18–24, as well as between the categories 11–24 and 25–27, and the apparent flattening of the association across higher categories are consistent with the possibility that the shape of the risk curve is non-linear. We considered that the association might be mediated by body fatness. Further adjustment for waist:hip ratio attenuated the association of the healthy diet pattern with MI (P for trend = 0·03).
* P for trend 0·004 (linear score).
† As described in the Methods, the a priori healthy diet pattern score was formed based on expert judgment of the authors, following principles of prudent and Western diet patterns. Foods were summed according to their tertile position, using cut-off points derived from the control group. A higher tertile position increased the score for cheese and yogurt, low-fat dairy, tea, wine, beer, liquor, fruit, wholegrain breads, wholegrain breakfast cereals, low-fat fish, high-fat fish, chicken, non-hydrogenated vegetable oil, dressings, mayonnaise, and sauces, cruciferous vegetables, tomatoes, salad, other vegetables, nuts, and soup. A lower tertile position increased the score for high-fat milk, butter and margarine, high-energy drinks, liver, red and processed meats, chips (crisps) and snacks, sweets, and pizza. Not included in the pattern were low-energy drinks, eggs, fruit juice, coffee, refined grains, condiments, and potatoes. The score has a theoretical range of 0–56.
‡ OR are adjusted for age, marital status, education, family history of heart disease, smoking, and energy intake.
Discussion
Our findings in analyses of both dietary patterns and individual food groups were consistent with our hypothesis that a nutrient-rich plant-centred diet is associated with a reduced risk of MI. We found significantly lower odds of MI for a higher score on an a priori formulation of a healthy diet pattern, based on the ideas of prudent and Western patterns similar to those in other studies (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Rimm, Stampfer, Ascherio, Spiegelman and Willett2000; Fung et al. Reference Fung, Willett, Stampfer, Manson and Hu2001; Kant, Reference Kant2004; Schulze & Hoffmann, Reference Schulze and Hoffmann2006). Analyses of individual food groups offered further support for a protective association of nutrient-rich plant foods. Comparison of dietary pattern and food group results offered a greater understanding of overall diet, as intake of foods are consumed in patterns, so that risk associations of foods may be confounded by other foods. The strength of the association between the healthy diet pattern score and risk of MI underscores the important role of diet in this disease. It is provocative that the gradient of risk appeared to be non-linear, being large across very low values of the healthy diet pattern score, then more shallowly graded for higher values. However, the present study is rather small to make judgments about the shape of the risk function.
Our findings, together with concordant findings for risk associated with individual food groups, lend further support to the often-reported inverse association between vegetables and fruits and CHD (Hu & Willett, Reference Hu and Willett2002; Kris-Etherton et al. Reference Kris-Etherton, Etherton, Carlson and Gardner2002; Srinath Reddy & Katan, Reference Srinath Reddy and Katan2004). ‘Wholegrain breakfast cereals’ was significantly associated with reduced risk of MI, but ‘wholegrain breads’ was not. Consumption of wholegrain breads is common in Norway and had associations with other, less healthy, foods, while wholegrain breakfast cereal intake tended to be associated generally with the healthier pattern. These food correlations may have contributed to the difference in risk findings for wholegrain breads v. breakfast cereals. The evidence for a protective effect of whole grains is consistent with a previous Norwegian study in which whole-grain food intake was inversely associated with CHD and CVD death (Jacobs et al. Reference Jacobs, Meyer and Solvoll2001).
Most studies of alcohol and CHD risk have reported a U-shaped relationship of CHD risk with total alcohol, rather than a specific beverage (Hill, Reference Hill2005); however, we did not find a significant association with total alcohol, as we did for wine. The question about type of alcoholic beverage notwithstanding, our findings are consistent with reports of lower risk in moderate drinkers v. non-drinkers (Hill, Reference Hill2005). Because higher alcohol intake was rare, we had little power to assess any increase in risk at higher levels of alcohol intake.
The study findings are in agreement with an emphasis on lipid quality rather than quantity (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Manson and Willett2001; Hu & Willett, Reference Hu and Willett2002; Kris-Etherton et al. Reference Kris-Etherton, Etherton, Carlson and Gardner2002). While butter and margarine intake was associated with an increased risk of MI, the intake of non-hydrogenated vegetable oil, though very low, was positively associated with a prudent pattern, and inversely associated with MI in one food group model. High-fat fish, which included cod-liver oil (Brustad et al. Reference Brustad, Braaten and Lund2004), was clearly inversely associated with MI, and as previously reported, n-3 fatty acids were higher in adipose tissue (Pedersen et al. Reference Pedersen, Ringstad, Almendingen, Haugen, Stensvold and Thelle2000) and serum (Yli-Jama et al. Reference Yli-Jama, Haugen, Rebnord, Ringstad and Pedersen2001) from controls v. cases. Nuts, another fatty food, were too infrequently consumed to assess their association with MI risk. The finding of excess risk for butter and margarine is not part of a general excess risk for dairy foods, which had various associations with MI risk. High-fat dairy was suggestively inversely associated with MI; in addition, dairy-derived adipose tissue fatty acids have been found to be associated with a reduced risk of MI in our work (Biong et al. Reference Biong, Veierod, Ringstad, Thelle and Pedersen2006). Cheese and yogurt intake (fermented dairy products high in fat) was non-significantly inversely associated with MI. We were unable to separate butter from margarine because several spreads were blends. Also, at the time of the study, the margarines were rich in trans fatty acids and the excess risk associated with butter and margarine intake may thus reflect a greater influence of the trans fatty acids in the margarines than of saturated fat (Pedersen et al. Reference Pedersen, Ringstad, Almendingen, Haugen, Stensvold and Thelle2000).
There was an inverse association of MI with high-fat fish intake. In part, observed associations of fish intake with MI may be less than the true effect of fish because of the Norwegian dietary preference for fish served with melted butter and margarine.
Tea was non-significantly inversely related to MI, and loaded positively to a prudent pattern, and negatively to the Western pattern, findings consistent with the possible protective association of tea on MI (Peters et al. Reference Peters, Poole and Arab2001, Reference Peters, Poole and Arab2002). Coffee was not associated with the risk of MI, in agreement with a large meta-analysis which concluded that an effect of coffee on risk of MI was unlikely (Greenland, Reference Greenland1993). Coffee boiled or otherwise prepared so that it retains certain fatty acids is highly cholesterol raising and may elevate the risk of MI (Thelle et al. Reference Thelle, Arnesen and Forde1983; Zock et al. Reference Zock, Katan, Merkus, van Dusseldorp and Harryvan1990), although other substances in coffee may hinder other conditions (van Dam & Hu, Reference van Dam and Hu2005; Andersen et al. Reference Andersen, Jacobs, Carlsen and Blomhoff2006). High- and low-energy drinks showed no association with MI as food groups.
The lack of positive association of sweets with MI was unexpected. However, this food group contained food items which have been associated with reduced risk of CHD in other studies, namely nuts (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Stampfer, Manson, Rimm, Colditz, Rosner, Speizer, Hennekens and Willett1998; Sabate, Reference Sabate1999; Kris-Etherton et al. Reference Kris-Etherton, Zhao, Binkoski, Coval and Etherton2001; Albert et al. Reference Albert, Gaziano, Willett and Manson2002), including almond paste, and chocolate (Ding et al. Reference Ding, Hutfless, Ding and Girotra2006). In addition, the extraction rate for grain is higher in Norway than in other countries such as the USA, so that Norwegian refined grains resemble whole grains more closely than American refined grains.
Our findings occurred despite relatively low power. The typical se of the regression coefficient per sd of a natural logarithmically transformed food group predicting the MI logit was 0·18; this implies that we had 80 % power to detect a 40 % decrease or a 65 % increase in MI risk. Some of the non-significant findings may well have been significant if the study had been larger and therefore had a larger discriminatory power. Indeed, it is remarkable that our findings are similar to those of larger studies, despite the small number of cases and controls. There were other potential limitations. A few controls selected as a convenience sample included friends and family of study collaborators, who tended to have more resources; this led to a more highly educated control group; exclusion of the more highly educated controls did not alter estimates greatly. Recall bias may have caused an overestimate of the diet and MI association; it is possible in case–control studies that cases shade their diet report towards unfavourable foods as a personal explanation of why they got sick. On the other hand, the protocol was carefully done and there were many positive design features: efforts were made to reduce recall bias of dietary intake and other systematic errors; cases were interviewed as soon as possible within 3 d after MI; and controls was recruited so as to minimise seasonal variation in reported diet.
In conclusion, in a case–control study of diet and MI in Norwegian adults food group analyses and findings for an ad hoc but a priori healthy diet pattern score that followed principles of prudent v. Western diet provided further support for the conclusion that MI is inversely associated with intake of nutrient-rich plant foods and fish. Overall these data support our hypothesis that a cardioprotective diet is high in nutrient-rich plant foods and fish, and low in meat products. These results are generally consistent with studies of diet and CHD in other populations (Hu et al. Reference Hu, Rimm, Stampfer, Ascherio, Spiegelman and Willett2000; Fung et al. Reference Fung, Willett, Stampfer, Manson and Hu2001; Kerver et al. Reference Kerver, Yang, Bianchi and Song2003; Kant, Reference Kant2004; Schulze & Hoffmann, Reference Schulze and Hoffmann2006), including adverse influence of trans fatty acid intake, and add to the body of literature supporting the healthful effects of a nutrient-rich plant-centred diet.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by NIH NRSA T32HL007779, CVD Epidemiology and Prevention, American Heart Association – Greater Midwest Affiliate, Throne Holst's Foundation for Nutrition Research, The Norwegian Association of Margarine Producers, DeNoFa Fabriker A/S and Tine Norwegian Dairies.