Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:24:41.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary l-arginine supplementation attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response in broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2014

Jianzhuang Tan
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing100193, People's Republic of China Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN47907, USA
Shasha Liu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing100193, People's Republic of China
Yuming Guo*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing100193, People's Republic of China
Todd J. Applegate*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN47907, USA
Susan D. Eicher
Affiliation:
Livestock Behavioral Research Unit, United State Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, West Lafayette, IN, USA
*
*Corresponding authors: Yuming Guo, fax +86 10 6273 3900, email [email protected]; T. J. Applegate, fax +1 765 494 9346, email [email protected]
*Corresponding authors: Yuming Guo, fax +86 10 6273 3900, email [email protected]; T. J. Applegate, fax +1 765 494 9346, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the present study, two experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of dietary l-arginine (Arg) supplementation on the inflammatory response and innate immunity of broiler chickens. Expt 1 was designed as a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement (n 8 cages/treatment; n 6 birds/cage) with three dietary Arg concentrations (1·05, 1·42 and 1·90 %) and two immune treatments (injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or saline) given at an interval of 48 h between 14 and 21 d of age. In Expt 2, correlation between dietary Arg concentration (0·99, 1·39, 1·76, 2·13 or 2·53 %) and percentage of circulating B cells (percentage of circulating lymphocytes) was determined. In Expt 1, LPS injection decreased body-weight gain and feed intake and increased feed conversion ratio of the challenged broilers (14–21 d; P< 0·05). LPS injection suppressed (P< 0·05) the percentages of splenic CD11+ and B cells (percentages of splenic lymphocytes) and phagocytic activity of splenic heterophils and macrophages; Arg supplementation linearly decreased the percentages of CD11+, CD14+ and B cells in the spleen (P< 0·10). LPS injection increased (P< 0·05) the expression of IL-1β and IL-6 mRNA in the spleen and caecal tonsils. Arginine supplementation decreased (P< 0·05) the expression of IL-1β, Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and PPAR-γ mRNA in the spleen and IL-1β, IL-10, TLR4 and NF-κB mRNA in the caecal tonsils. In Expt 2, increasing dietary Arg concentrations linearly and quadratically reduced the percentage of circulating B cells (P< 0·01). Collectively, Arg supplementation attenuated the overexpression of pro-inflammatory cytokines probably through the suppression of the TLR4 pathway and CD14+ cell percentage. Furthermore, excessive Arg supplementation (1·76 %) suppressed the percentages of circulating and splenic B cells.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 

l-Arginine (Arg) is an essential amino acid for chickens and is a conditionally essential amino acid for mammals under surgery, sepsis and many other pathological conditions( Reference Popovic, Zeh and Ochoa 1 Reference Luiking, Poeze and Ramsay 3 ). It is used for the synthesis of NO and polyamines, which are involved in the modulation of inflammation and wound healing( Reference Bronte and Zanovello 2 , Reference Calkins, Bensard and Heimbach 4 , Reference Shi, Efron and Most 5 ). Although Arg has been used in chickens to enhance the immune function during immunological stress( Reference Tayade, Jaiswal and Mishra 6 ), there is still no consensus on the benefits of supplementing Arg beyond the NRC( 7 )-recommended concentration( Reference Jahanian 8 ). In normal animal-rearing conditions, the animal is inevitably confronted with various microbial challenges that often will not result in clinical disease. However, these microbial challenges lead to a series of immune responses, including mild inflammatory responses, which changes the partitioning of nutrients away from body protein accretion to support the immune responses, thereby reducing the growth potential of the animal( Reference Roura, Homedes and Klasing 9 ). Studies in piglets and chickens have demonstrated that dietary Arg supplementation could enhance the immune functions of animals under immunological stress( Reference Munir, Muneer and Masaoud 10 , Reference Han, Liu and Fan 11 ). Furthermore, a study in mice has shown that Arg administration decreases the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in a dextran sulphate sodium-induced inflammatory bowel disease model( Reference Coburn, Gong and Singh 12 ). However, few studies have been conducted to determine the effect of dietary Arg supplementation on the inflammatory response in chickens.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or endotoxin, is a Gram-negative bacteria cell-wall component that has been extensively used in chickens to induce inflammatory response( Reference Zhang, Nii and Isobe 13 Reference Munyaka, Tactacan and Jing 15 ). Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is a germ line-encoded receptor that can be stimulated by structural motifs characteristically expressed by bacteria, such as LPS, which triggers the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines as well as the functional maturation of antigen-presenting cells of the innate immune system( Reference Lu, Yeh and Ohashi 16 ). In mammals, the sensing of LPS involves the LPS-binding protein (LBP), which mediates the transfer of LPS to CD14 and/or CD11/18 cells, which deliver the LPS to myeloid differentiation protein-2, which finally transfers the LPS to a TLR4 molecule( Reference Beutler 17 ). No clear orthologues to human LBP have been identified in the chicken genome; however, chickens still sense LPS via the TLR4 pathway and further trigger NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response( Reference Keestra and Putten 14 ).

TLR4 is a transmembrane signal transporter that activates intracellular NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinases, resulting in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-6( Reference Keestra and Putten 14 , Reference Zhang, Zhong and Zhou 18 , Reference Baker, Hayden and Ghosh 19 ). Calkins et al. ( Reference Calkins, Bensard and Heimbach 4 ) reported that oral Arg administration attenuates the LPS-induced overexpression of lung chemokines in mice by the inhibition of NF-κB DNA binding and that Arg supplementation in cell-culture media reduces the expression of TLR4 mRNA in swine intestinal cells( Reference Tan, Yin and Kong 20 ). Thus, the hypothesis of the present study was that dietary Arg supplementation could attenuate LPS-induced inflammation in broiler chickens through the suppression of the LPS/TLR4 pathway. The present study was designed to test this hypothesis using a LPS-induced inflammatory model and investigate the potential modulatory effect of dietary Arg supplementation on inflammatory response in broiler chickens.

Materials and methods

Birds and experimental design

In Expt 1, the effect of dietary Arg supplementation on the inflammatory response of chickens following LPS injection was determined. A total of 288 male Ross broilers (708; Aviagen, Inc.) were obtained from a local commercial hatchery. The chickens were weighed and allocated to groups so that their initial weights were similar across all the groups. This experiment was designed with six treatments, each involving eight replicate cages (six birds per cage) with a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement including two different treatments (an unchallenged positive control (control treatment) and a LPS-challenged negative control (LPS treatment)) and three concentrations of Arg (1·05, 1·42 or 1·90 %). The experimental design has been described in a previous study, in which chickens fed a diet containing 1·00 % of Arg had lower immunity( Reference Jahanian 8 ); Arg concentration of 1·40 % has been used in our previous study (J Tan, Y Guo, TJ Applegate and E Du, unpublished results) and it led to a good immune function in the chickens, and 1·90 % served as the highest concentration value of Arg used in the supplementation. In this experiment, all diets (except Arg) were formulated to meet or exceed the NRC( 7 ) requirements and Ross 708 Nutrient Specifications for broilers. An initial basal diet was mixed to contain a formulated Arg of 1·05 %. The final diets were obtained by mixing 98·4 % of the basal ration with a premix containing different concentrations of Arg and Solka-Floc® (purified cellulose; Table 1). At 14, 16, 18 and 20 d of age, the broilers were injected intra-abdominally with Escherichia coli LPS (serotype 0111:B4, LPS treatment; Sigma-Aldrich, Inc.) at a dose of 1 mg/kg of body weight (BW) or the same amount of 0·9 % (w/v) sterile saline (control treatment). At 21 d of age, one bird was randomly selected from each replicate and was killed by CO2 overdosing for sampling. Spleens were collected for splenocyte isolation and mRNA extraction and caecal tonsils were collected for RNA extraction. Tissue samples collected for RNA extraction were held overnight at 4°C in RNAlater (Ambion) and stored at − 80°C until RNA isolation.

Table 1 Composition of the experimental diets used in Expt 1 (g/kg dry diet)

CP, crude protein; ME, metabolisable energy.

* Supplied the following per kg complete diet: Cu, 8 mg; Zn, 75 mg; Fe, 80 mg; Mn, 100 mg; Se, 0·15 mg; I, 0·35 mg; trans-retinyl acetate, 24 mg; cholecalciferol, 6 mg; dl-α-tocopheryl acetate, 7·2 mg; menadione, 1·3 mg; thiamin, 2 mg; riboflavin, 6 mg; cyanocobalamin, 0·025 mg; biotin, 0·0325 mg; folic acid, 1·25 mg; pantothenic acid, 12 mg; niacin, 50 mg.

Calculated value.

Analysed concentrations.

In Expt 2, the effect of graded supplementation of Arg (0·99, 1·39, 1·76, 2·13 or 2·53 %) on the percentage of circulating B cells (percentage of circulating lymphocytes) was investigated using a completely randomised design. A total of 250 female Ross broilers (308; Aviagen, Inc.) were used. The chickens were weighed and allocated to five treatments (ten replicates per treatment; five birds per replicate) so that the initial weight of each group was similar. The chickens were fed one of the five experimental diets for 21 d ad libitum. In this experiment, all diets (except Arg) were formulated to meet or exceed the NRC( 7 ) requirements for broilers. An initial basal diet was mixed to contain a formulated Arg of 0·99 %. The final diets were obtained by mixing 97·96 % of the basal ration with a premix (2·04 %) containing different concentrations of Arg and l-alanine. Ingredient formulation, nutrients and analysed dietary Arg concentration in Expt 2 are given in Table 2. At 21 d of age, a blood sample from one randomly selected bird per replicate was collected from the brachial vein with a heparinised syringe for peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) isolation.

Table 2 Composition of the experimental diets used in Expt 2 (g/kg dry diet)

CP, crude protein; ME, metabolisable energy.

* Supplied the following per kg complete diet: Cu, 8 mg; Zn, 75 mg; Fe, 80 mg; Mn, 100 mg; Se, 0·15 mg; I, 0·35 mg; trans-retinyl acetate, 24 mg; cholecalciferol, 6 mg; dl-α-tocopheryl acetate, 7·2 mg; menadione, 1·3 mg; thiamin, 2 mg; riboflavin, 6 mg; cyanocobalamin, 0·025 mg; biotin, 0·0325 mg; folic acid, 1·25 mg; pantothenic acid, 12 mg; niacin, 50 mg.

Calculated value.

Analysed concentrations.

Animal use and care procedures followed in Expt 1 were approved by the Purdue Animal Care and Use Committee and those followed in Expt 2 were approved by the China Agricultural University Animal Care and Use Committee. Expt 1 and Expt 2 were carried out following the same management procedure. All the chickens were housed in stainless-steel brooders equipped with nipple-type waterers and thermostatically controlled heaters. The temperature was maintained at 37 ± 1°C during the first week and was reduced by 3°C each consecutive week until reaching 24°C. The lighting schedule was 22 h light–2 h dark throughout the experiments. Drinking-water and feed were provided ad libitum. Diet analyses for amino acid concentration were conducted using HPLC (University of Missouri Agriculture Experiment Station Chemistry Laboratory; AOAC International, 2000; method 982.30.E (a, b, c))( 21 ).

Splenocyte and peripheral blood mononuclear cell isolation

Splenocyte isolation was carried out as described previously( Reference Park, Cha and Kang 22 ) with the following modifications. The spleens were collected immediately after the chicks were killed and placed in sterile Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium in 10 ml tubes kept on ice. After removal of the adherent fat and tissues, a cell suspension was prepared by grinding the spleens through a 60 mesh screen; the cells were centrifuged at 80  g for 10 min at 4°C and the supernatant was collected into a new 15 ml tube and the pellet discarded. The supernatant was centrifuged at 200  g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded and the pellets were resuspended in 2·5 ml RPMI, after which splenocytes were washed two times. Splenocyte counts and viability were evaluated using Trypan Blue exclusion.

PBMC were isolated from peripheral blood samples using Ficoll density centrifugation according to the method of Long et al. ( Reference Long, Guo and Wang 23 ). Briefly, blood samples were carefully layered on the top of the Ficoll layer (Histopaque 1077; Sigma Chemical Company) in a 10 ml centrifuge tube (1:1). The tube was centrifuged at 200  g for 30 min (25°C). After centrifugation, the PBMC at the plasma–ficoll interface were collected. Cold RPMI-1640 medium (containing 5·0 % inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 U (0·0599 mg) penicillin/ml, 100 μg streptomycin/ml and 10 mm-HEPES) was added to the tube containing the PBMC. Then, the cells were washed three times with cold RPMI-1640 medium by centrifugation at 100  g for 10 min (4°C). PBMC counts and viability were evaluated using Trypan Blue exclusion.

Determination of the phagocytic activity of splenocytes

The phagocytic activity of splenocytes was performed using pHrodo™ E. coli BioParticles® Phagocytosis Kits (Invitrogen Canada, Inc.). Briefly, 100 μl of splenocytes were incubated for 15 min at 37°C with 20 μl of pHrodo™ BioParticles® conjugate (Molecular Probes). Control samples were incubated for 15 min on ice. Then, the samples were washed two times according to the kit instructions, and the cell pellets were resuspended in 0·5 ml of wash buffer for flow cytometric analysis. The samples were analysed using an Accuri® C6 flow cytometer (Accuri Cytometers). Data were collected from 10 000 events. The threshold was adjusted to eliminate background fluorescence after the application of a negative control sample. The linear forward-scatter characteristic (FSC) and side-scatter characteristic (SSC) voltages were set to locate the heterophil and macrophage population following the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen Canada, Inc.) and as described previously( Reference Watson 24 ). Phagocytic activity is expressed as a percentage of cells that were phagocytic, and phagocytic intensity is expressed as mean fluorescence intensity.

Flow cytometric analysis of immune cell phenotypes

Splenocytes were stained with chicken CD3 (fluorescein isothiocyanate), chicken Bu-1 (phycoerythrin; PE), human CD14 (PE) and human CD11 (Alexa Fluor® 488) for 30 min in a water-bath (37°C). The PBMC were stained with chicken Bu-1 (PE) for 30 min on ice. The control samples were processed without antibody staining. All the antibodies used in the present study were purchased from Southern Biotech. The CD14 antibodies have been used to label chicken lymphocytes in a previous study( Reference Dil and Qureshi 25 ). The cells were then washed two times with 1 ×  Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS), fixed with paraformaldehyde solution (3 % in HBSS) and stored at 4°C until further analysis. The samples were analysed using an Accuri®C6 flow cytometer (Accuri Cytometers). Lymphocytes were gated by FSC and SSC and 10 000 gated events were analysed. Briefly, subcellular dead cell debris can be distinguished from single cells by size as they have lower FSC and higher SSC than living cells. Compared with monocytes, lymphocytes have lower FSC and SSC. The threshold was adjusted to eliminate background fluorescence after the application of a negative control sample( Reference Watson 24 ). Cell phenotype data are expressed as a percentage of gated lymphocytes. The percentage of total splenic lymphocytes was based on total isolated splenocytes. The percentage of total peripheral blood lymphocytes was based on total isolated PBMC.

Total RNA extraction and RT

Total RNA of spleen and caecal tonsils was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen Canada, Inc.) following the manufacturer's protocol. The concentration, quality and integrity of total RNA were evaluated using a spectrophotometer as described previously( Reference Simms, Cizdziel and Chomczynski 26 ). The total RNA was incubated with DNase I (Sigma Chemical Company) at room temperature for 15 min, and the DNase I was subsequently inactivated by heating the reaction mixture at 70°C for 10 min. An RNA amount of 2 μg was used for RT using Moloney murine leukaemia virus RT (Promega) with Oligo-dt (Qiagen, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol, and the complementary DNA was stored at − 20°C.

Real-time quantitative PCR

Real-time quantitative PCR for determining the expression of inflammation-related genes in the spleen and caecal tonsils was carried out using iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) in a Bio-Rad iQ5 detection system (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was considered as an internal control to normalise the amount of starting RNA used for real-time quantitative PCR for each sample. A reaction mixture of 20 μl contained 10 μl of iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad), 0·3 μm of each forward primer and reverse primer (Table 3), and 6 μl of complementary DNA. Each analysis was carried out in triplicate. The following protocol was used for all the genes: 95°C for 5 min; forty cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 55°C for 20 s; 72°C for 20 s. The standard curve was determined using pooled samples, and the real-time quantitative PCR efficiency for each gene was determined by amplifying a dilution series of complementary DNA (10( − 1/slope)), and the efficiency values were consistent between the target genes and housekeeping gene. The specificity of the amplified products was evaluated with the melting curve analysis. The abundance of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA as the housekeeping gene was not influenced by the dietary Arg concentration and LPS injection in both the spleen and caecal tonsils (data not shown). The average gene expression relative to the expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase for each sample was calculated using the $$2^{ - \Delta \Delta C _{t}} $$ method( Reference Livak and Schmittgen 27 ), and the calibrator for each gene was the average ΔC t value of the pooled sample.

Table 3 Primers used in real-time quantitative PCR*

GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; F, forward; R, reverse; TLR, Toll-like receptor.

* Primers designed using the Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems).

National Center for Biotechnology Information accession numbers.

Statistical analysis

The results are reported as means with their standard errors, and all the data were analysed using the GLM procedure of SAS software (SAS Institute, Inc.). Data were subjected to two-way ANOVA in a 2 × 3 factorial arrangement with immunological challenge and dietary Arg concentration as the main effects and their interactions. The analysis of interactions was based on a hypothesis that a non-linear response to Arg concentration could potentially interact with LPS; therefore, a polynomial contrast for the dose responsiveness of dietary Arg concentrations was conducted. When interactions were significant, polynomial contrasts were used to determine the linear and quadratic responses of simple means to dietary Arg concentrations within the LPS-injected and saline-injected groups, respectively. When interactions were not significant, the polynomial contrasts were conducted over main effect means for Arg concentrations (averaged over LPS treatments). At 14 d of age, the BW were different between the treatment groups; therefore, 14 d BW was used as a covariate in the model to analyse the growth performance from 14 to 21 d. Polynomial contrasts were used to determine significant linear, quadratic and cubic responses of circulating B cells (peripheral blood B cells) to dietary Arg concentrations (analysed dietary Arg concentrations). A P≤ 0·05 was considered to be statistically significant, and 0·05 < P <0·10 was considered to be a trend towards significance.

Results

Expt 1

With the exception of the feed conversion ratio (FCR) and IL-1β mRNA expression in the caecal tonsils, no significant Arg × LPS interactions were observed for any of the other measured characteristics.

Growth performance

The growth performance of chickens between 14 and 21 d of age is summarised in Table 4. Dietary Arg supplementation significantly increased (P< 0·05) the BW of chickens at 14 d of age. Compared with the saline injection, LPS injection significantly decreased (P< 0·05) the BW gain by 9·36 % and feed intake (FI) by 14·87 % in the LPS-challenged chickens, while dietary Arg supplementation significantly increased (P< 0·05) the BW gain and FI of the chickens. An interaction between LPS challenge and dietary Arg concentration was significant (P< 0·05) for the FCR, wherein chickens in the control group (1·05 % Arg) had the highest FCR and those in the challenged group (1·90 % Arg) had the lowest FCR compared with all the other groups. The FCR was linearly and quadratically (P< 0·05) reduced by increasing dietary Arg concentrations in the saline-injected groups. Increasing dietary Arg concentrations had a more pronounced effect in the non-challenged chickens than in the LPS-challenged chickens.

Table 4 Growth performance of broilers fed diets containing 1·05, 1·42 or 1·90 % arginine (Arg) with or without lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge from 14 to 21 d of age (Expt 1)* (Mean values with their standard errors)

L, linear; Q, quadratic; BW, body weight; BWG, body-weight gain; FI, feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio.

a,b Mean values within a row with unlike superscript letters have a L and Q dose response to Arg concentrations (P< 0.05).

* LPS injection: chickens were injected with LPS (1 mg/kg of BW) four times at 48 h intervals from 14 to 20 d; saline injection (control): chickens were injected with the same amount of sterile saline (0·9 %).

L and Q contrasts on the main effect means for Arg concentrations (averaged over LPS treatments).

Analysed by ANOVA.

§ Analysed by covariance analysis using 14 d BW as the covariant.

Determination of the phagocytic activity of splenocytes

LPS injection significantly suppressed (P< 0·05) the percentage of phagocytic heterophils and macrophages (Table 5). However, no significant effect of dietary Arg concentration on phagocytic capacity was observed (P>0·05).

Table 5 Effect of graded supplementation of arginine (Arg) (1·05, 1·42 or 1·90 %) on the phagocytic activity of splenic heterophils and macrophages of broiler chickens on day 7 after continuous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection (Expt 1)* (Mean values with their standard errors)

L, linear; Q, quadratic; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

* LPS injection: chickens were injected with LPS (1 mg/kg of BW) four times at 48 h intervals from 14 to 20 d; saline injection (control): chickens were injected with the same amount of sterile saline (0·9 %).

L and Q contrasts on the main effect means for Arg concentrations (averaged over LPS treatments).

Percentage of phagocytic-active cells.

Immune cell phenotypes

The effect of dietary Arg concentration on splenocyte phenotypes is summarised in Table 6. Increasing dietary Arg concentrations linearly (P< 0·05) reduced the percentages of splenic Bu1+, CD11+ and CD14+ cells (percentages of splenic lymphocytes), whereas no significant difference was found in the percentages of splenic CD3+ cells (P>0·05). Compared with the control treatment, LPS injection significantly reduced (P< 0·05) the percentages of Bu1+ and CD11+ cells in the spleen and tended to reduce the percentage of CD14+ cells (P< 0·10). No significant (P>0·05) difference was observed in the percentages of CD3+ cells. The percentage of total lymphocytes in the spleen (percentage of total splenocytes) was not influenced by either LPS injection or Arg supplementation (P>0·05).

Table 6 Effect of graded supplementation of arginine (Arg) (1·05, 1·42 or 1·90 %) on the percentages of splenic leucocytes expressing cell-surface antigens for CD3, B cells (Bu-1), CD11 and CD14 of broiler chickens on day 7 after continuous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection* (Expt 1) (Mean values with their standard errors)

L, linear; Q, quadratic.

* LPS injection: chickens were injected with LPS (1 mg/kg of BW) four times at 48 h intervals from 14 to 20 d; saline injection (control): chickens were injected with the same amount of sterile saline (0·9 %).

L and Q contrasts on the main effect means for Arg concentrations (averaged over LPS treatments).

Based on gated lymphocytes.

§ Based on total splenocytes.

Gene expression in the spleen and caecal tonsils

LPS injection significantly (P< 0·05) increased the expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β in the spleen and IL-6 in the caecal tonsils. Dietary Arg supplementation linearly decreased (P< 0·05) the expression of IL-1β in the spleen; however, no significant (P>0·05) effect was found on the expression of IL-6. LPS injection significantly (P< 0·05) reduced the expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in the spleen, while increasing Arg concentrations linearly and quadratically (P< 0·05) decreased the expression of IL-10 in the caecal tonsils. LPS injection significantly increased the expression of TLR4 (P< 0·05) in the spleen and tended to up-regulate the expression of TLR4 in the caecal tonsils (P= 0·061), while dietary Arg supplementation linearly (P< 0·05) down-regulated the expression of TLR4 in the spleen and caecal tonsils. In the caecal tonsils, dietary Arg supplementation linearly and quadratically (P< 0·05) decreased the expression of NF-κB; however, no significant (P>0·05) effect was observed in the spleen. The expression of PPAR-γ tended (P= 0·052) to be reduced by LPS injection in the caecal tonsils. Dietary Arg supplementation quadratically (P< 0·05) reduced the expression of PPAR-γ in the spleen. There was a LPS × Arg interaction (P< 0·05) for the expression of IL-1β in the caecal tonsils, wherein dietary Arg supplementation had no significant (P>0·05) effect on the non-challenged chickens, whereas it linearly and quadratically (P< 0·05) reduced the expression of IL-1β in the caecal tonsils of the LPS-challenged chickens (Table 7).

Table 7 Effect of graded supplementation of arginine (Arg) (1·05, 1·42 or 1·90 %) on the relative mRNA expression of pro/anti-inflammatory cytokine and inflammatory regulation genes in the spleen and caecal tonsils of broiler chickens on day 7 after continuous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection* (Expt 1) (Mean values with their standard errors)

L, linear; Q, quadratic; TLR4, Toll-like receptor 4.

a,b Mean values within the LPS- or saline-injected groups have a linear and quadratic dose response to Arg concentrations (P< 0·05).

* LPS injection: chickens were injected with LPS (1 mg/kg of BW) four times at 48 h intervals from 14 to 20 d; saline injection (control): chickens were injected with the same amount of sterile saline (0·9 %).

L and Q contrasts on the main effect means for Arg concentrations (averaged over LPS treatments).

Expt 2

With the increase in dietary Arg concentrations, the percentage of circulating B cells (percentage of circulating lymphocytes) decreased linearly (P< 0·01), quadratically (P< 0·01) and cubically (P< 0·05). The percentage of total circulating lymphocytes (percentage of isolated PBMC) was not influenced by the dietary Arg concentration (P>0·05; Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Effect of dietary l-arginine (Arg) concentration on (A) the percentage of circulating B cells (based on gated total lymphocytes) and (B) the percentage of gated total lymphocytes (based on isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells) (21 d, Expt 2). Values are means of ten individual chickens, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,bMean values (■) with unlike letters were significantly different (P≤ 0·05). The percentage of circulating B cells decreased linearly (P= 0·002), quadratically (P= 0·002) and cubically (P= 0·022) with increasing dietary Arg concentrations (P< 0·01). No effect was observed on the percentage of gated total lymphocytes (P>0·05). (B) Linear (P= 0·171), quadratic (P= 0·315) and cubic (P= 0·253).

Discussion

Animals that are raised in an environment in which they are exposed to frequent microbial challenges grow at a slower growth rate and have lower nutrient utilisation, which cause a tremendous loss to poultry production( Reference Klasing and Barnes 28 ). Studies in mammals and birds have demonstrated that Arg is an important immune-modulatory nutrient, wherein dietary Arg supplementation could enhance both innate and adaptive immune functions of animals( Reference Bronte and Zanovello 2 , Reference Tan, Li and Kong 29 ). Arg supplementation has been used to alleviate inflammatory response in mammalian models( Reference Coburn, Gong and Singh 12 ). Although the immune system of birds, which is different from that of mammals, is well characterised, the regulatory function of Arg in the inflammatory response of chickens is still unknown. To evaluate whether Arg supplementation alleviates the inflammatory response in broiler chickens, a model for inducing inflammation in broilers by injecting E. coli LPS was used.

The suppression of the growth performance of animals reared in unsanitary environments is thought to be a result of excessive immune defence response, such as inflammation, which is marked by reduced FI and muscle protein accretion and wasted energy and protein for defence protein synthesis (e.g. acute-phase proteins)( Reference Klasing and Barnes 28 , Reference Cook 30 ). We employed a previously described inflammatory model wherein repeated injections of LPS resulted in a significant reduction in weight gain and FI( Reference Klasing and Barnes 28 , Reference Webel, Johnson and Baker 31 ), which is in agreement with the results of the present study. One may question whether LPS-induced reductions in performance are primarily a result of reductions in FI or excessive inflammatory response. A previous report from our laboratory( Reference Jiang, Schatzmayr and Mohnl 32 ) has demonstrated that compared with pair-feeding (the same amount of feed is fed), LPS injection significantly reduces BWG and increases the FCR of chickens (14–21 d), which provides evidence that activation of the inflammatory system of chickens is costly in terms of growth beyond that of only reducing FI. In the present study, LPS injection increased the expression of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and TLR4, which suppressed growth processes by directing nutrients away from body protein accretion to support the immune response. Thus, if Arg supplementation could alleviate the inflammatory response of chickens, it could be used as an important component for designing immune-enhancing diets to diminish the economic loss caused by infection, which has been considered as an effective nutritional strategy to reduce infection rates and post-infection recovery( Reference Bansal, Syres and Makarenkova 33 , Reference Ochoa, Makarenkova and Bansal 34 ).

Phagocytosis is an innate immune reaction for the clearance of bacterial infections of animals, which plays an indispensable role in the defence against various infections( Reference Seifert, Fritz and Carlini 35 ). In chickens, heterophils are key components of the innate immune system that play a role similar to that of neutrophils in mammals( Reference Chuammitri, Redmond and Kimura 36 ). Heterophils are highly phagocytic and have a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activities( Reference Harmon 37 ). A previous study has reported that dietary Arg supplementation increases the proportion of circulating heterophils in chickens( Reference Lee, Austic and Naqi 38 ), but it failed to enhance the phagocytic activity of heterophils in the present study. Macrophages are a key arm of the innate immune defence system in intracellular bacterial killing( Reference Ibuki, Kovacs-Nolan and Fukui 39 ). The antimicrobial activities of macrophages are due to the generation of reactive oxygen species and reactive N species, such as H2O2 and NO, which are important metabolites of Arg( Reference Bronte and Zanovello 2 ). An in vitro study in channel catfish has suggested that supplementation of Arg to cell-culture media enhances the phagocytic activity of head kidney macrophages( Reference Pohlenz, Buentello and Mwangi 40 ), but no significant influence was observed in the present study. Central to inflammation is the recruitment of leucocytes to the site of infection, which is characterised by the migration of heterophils and macrophages from blood and spleen to the site of infection( Reference Gong, Hart and Shchurin 41 ). Therefore, LPS injection induced the migration of leucocytes from the spleen to the site of injection, which suppressed the phagocytic activity of heterophils and macrophages in the spleen.

It is well known that Arg plays an important role in the development of T cells( Reference Zea, Rodriguez and Culotta 42 ), as Arg deprivation arrests T cells in the G0–G1 phase of the cell cycle( Reference Rodriguez, Hernandez and Morrow 43 ), and Arg deficiency can have an unambiguous effect on early B-cell development( Reference Jonge, Kwikkers and Velde 44 ). In the present study, no significant effect of Arg deficiency was observed on the percentage of CD3+T cells, while increasing dietary Arg concentrations significantly reduced the percentages of both splenic and circulating B cells (P< 0·05). Previous studies have reported that H2O2 can cause the apoptosis of macrophages by mitochondrial membrane depolarisation( Reference Chaturvedi, Cheng and Asim 45 ). In our previous study (J Tan, Y Guo, TJ Applegate and E Du, unpublished results), dietary Arg supplementation quadratically (P< 0·05) increased in vitro macrophage H2O2 production. Thus, the decrease in the proportion of B cells may be associated with the increasing production of H2O2, which could be synthesised by Arg through a NO synthase-2-depedent metabolic pathway( Reference Bronte and Zanovello 2 ). It is well known that immune-modulating nutrients can be helpful as well as harmful if not utilised in moderation( Reference Klasing 46 ), such as n-3 PUFA, which could be used to reduce the adverse effects of infectious bursal disease( Reference Maroufyan, Kasim and Ebrahimi 47 ) and improve cellular immunity( Reference Wang, Ding and Wang 48 ) of chickens, while it increases the incidence of Marek's disease( Reference Klasing and Korver 49 ). Thus, further research should be conducted to gain a better understanding of the optimal immune response for dietary Arg supplementation to direct the immune system in an optimal direction.

Cytokines are small, non-structural proteins with molecular weights ranging from 8 to 40 000 Da. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α promote inflammation, whereas anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-10 and IL-13 suppress inflammation( Reference Opal and DePalo 50 ). LPS injection has been used to trigger pro-inflammatory cytokine response in chickens( Reference Munyaka, Tactacan and Jing 15 ), which was considered to be a result of TLR4 activation( Reference Keestra and Putten 14 ). When expressed in excess, pro-inflammatory cytokines may cause fever, inflammation and tissue destruction( Reference Dinarello 51 ). In the present study, the overexpression of IL-1β in the spleen and caecal tonsils was alleviated by dietary Arg supplementation, indicating that Arg supplementation may have a beneficial effect on the attenuation of the inflammatory response induced by LPS injection.

IL-10 is a critical anti-inflammatory cytokine secreted by activated macrophages that serves as a feedback response of inflammation to prevent the excessive expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. T helper (Th) 2 cytokines, such as IL-10 and IL-4, could activate arginase-1 in macrophages( Reference Popovic, Zeh and Ochoa 1 ), which converts Arg into ornithine, and ornithine can be decarboxylated by ornithine decarboxylase to produce putrescine and further converted into polyamines (spermidine and spermine). Polyamines have been reported to be important inhibitory substances for the LPS-induced expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines( Reference Bossche, Lamers and Koehler 52 ). In the present study, LPS injection decreased the expression of IL-10, which is in agreement with the findings of a previous study( Reference Shanmugasundaram and Selvaraj 53 ). However, dietary Arg supplementation failed to enhance the expression of IL-10. PPAR are members of the nuclear hormone receptor family. PPAR ligands, in particular, PPAR-γ ligands, could inhibit inflammatory response and negatively regulate pro-inflammatory transcription factor signalling pathways in inflammatory cells( Reference Moraes, Piqueras and Bishop-Bailey 54 ). Nutritional dietary strategies have been described to enhance the expression of PPAR-γ, which exerts a beneficial effect on the alleviation of the inflammatory response induced by LPS injection( Reference Zhang, Guo and Yang 55 ). However, dietary Arg supplementation failed to enhance the expression of PPAR-γ. Thus, Arg does not modulate the inflammatory response through anti-inflammatory cytokines and the PPAR-γ pathway.

Chicken CD14 is 34 % homologous to human orthologues at the protein level, and they share several structural features such as conserved leucine-rich repeats and conserved cysteines( Reference Wu, Rothwell and Hu 56 ). Mammalian CD14 is expressed as a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchored cell-surface protein that can be released as a soluble serum protein (sCD14)( Reference Schutt 57 ). In the absence of chicken serum, LPS induced the up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine gene expression in chicken heterophils, indicating that LPS can be directly recognised by CD14 or TLR4, while the presence of chicken serum or mouse LBP dramatically enhanced the activation of heterophils, suggesting that a functional protein similar to mammalian LBP may exists in chicken serum( Reference Kogut, He and Kaiser 58 ). Chicken CD14 plays an unclear role in LPS sensing, while chicken CD14 is essential for the activation of LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine response( Reference Brownlie and Allan 59 ). Panaro et al. ( Reference Panaro, Cianciulli and Gagliardi 60 ) reported that the activation of chicken embryo cardiomyocyte inflammation by LPS requires the engagement of both TLR4 and CD14, since anti-CD14 pretreatment of cardiomyocytes prevents the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. A similar finding has been reported for chicken macrophages, with the administration of either anti-CD14 or anti-TLR4 antibodies completely blocking LPS-mediated inducible NO synthase (iNOS) activation, suggesting that both CD14 and TLR4 are required for LPS-mediated iNOS activation( Reference Dil and Qureshi 61 ). The inhibition of CD14, such as with an anti-CD14 antibody, has been used as a therapeutic approach to protect primates from LPS-induced shock due to overexpression of inflammatory cytokines( Reference Leturcq, Moriarty and Talbott 62 ). In the present study, increasing dietary Arg concentrations linearly reduced the percentage of CD14+ cells in the spleen. Therefore, Arg supplementation could be suggested as a potential nutritional approach for the mediation of a hyper-inflammatory response. Since the exact role that chicken CD14 plays in inflammatory response is still unclear, further studies are needed to get the whole picture.

Chicken TLR4 is about 43 % homologous to human orthologues at the protein level( Reference Brownlie and Allan 59 ). Chicken sense LPS via the TLR4 and myeloid differentiation protein-2 complex and further activate the NF-κB inflammatory cascade( Reference Keestra and Putten 14 , Reference Zoete, Keestra and Roszczenko 63 ). Compared with mammalian species, chicken lack the myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88)-independent signalling pathway in which the downstream production of interferon-β occurs in mammals( Reference Keestra and Putten 14 ). Mammalian TLR4/myeloid differentiation protein-2 complex depends on two different intracellular signalling routes for NF-κB activation: the MyD88/Toll-IL 1 receptor domain-containing adaptor protein (TIRAP) and TRAM/TRIF (TRIF-related adaptor molecule/Toll-IL 1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing interferon) pathways( Reference O'Neill and Bowie 64 ). As chickens lack an orthologue of TRAM that bridges TLR4 and TRIF, chicken TLR4 signals only by the MyD88/TIRAP-dependent pathway( Reference Keestra, Zoete and Bouwman 65 ). The result reported herein showed that LPS injection increased the expression of TLR4 mRNA in the spleen and caecal tonsils and activated the pro-inflammatory cytokine response. Interestingly, dietary Arg supplementation suppressed the expression of TLR4 mRNA linearly. Thus, the suppression of the TLR4 pathway could be one of the mechanisms by which Arg alleviates inflammatory response. In subclinical conditions, the local inflammatory response recruits other phagocytic or non-phagocytic lymphocytes to eliminate foreign pathogens, which is very important for host defence. Therefore, under these conditions, the suppression of the TLR4 pathway and CD14+ cell percentage could be a potential negative effect.

In cells (e.g. macrophages and myeloid cells), Arg is mainly metabolised by iNOS or by arginase-1 to synthesise NO and polyamines, respectively( Reference Popovic, Zeh and Ochoa 1 ). iNOS and arginase-1 are stimulated by Th1 and Th2 cytokines, respectively( Reference Bronte and Zanovello 2 ). Dietary Arg supplementation failed to enhance the expression of Th2 cytokines (IL-2 and IL-10) in the present study; thus, Arg may not exert its inflammation-modulatory effects through the arginase-1 pathway. Previous work has shown that oral administration of Arg attenuates LPS-induced lung chemokine production in mice( Reference Calkins, Bensard and Heimbach 4 ). This effect is dependent on NO and is mediated by the stabilisation of inhibitory κB-α concentrations. Studies in mice have also shown that Arg supplementation could alleviate the inflammatory response in dextran sulphate sodium colitis, while this benefit has been found to be eliminated when tested in the iNOS –/– mice( Reference Coburn, Gong and Singh 12 ). Furthermore, a study in chickens has shown that dietary Arg supplementation could increase circulating NO production( Reference Khajali, Tahmasebi and Hassanpour 66 ); thus, we conclude that the beneficial effect of Arg on the alleviation of inflammatory response depends on NO through the iNOS pathway. Regretfully, in the present study, no direct evidence was obtained to prove whether Arg has a direct effect or acts through NO on the percentages of CD11+ and CD14+ cells and expression of TLR4, thus, requiring further studies.

In summary, the present study demonstrates that dietary Arg supplementation alleviated systemic inflammation of LPS-challenged chickens. It is possible that the ability of Arg to alleviate systemic inflammation is associated with the reduction in the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines via the suppression of the TLR4 pathway and percentage of CD14+ cells (percentage of splenic lymphocytes). The results obtained in the present study clarified the molecular events by which Arg alleviated the systemic inflammatory response caused by LPS injection. Furthermore, excessive dietary Arg supplementation suppressed the percentages of both splenic (1·90 %) and peripheral blood B cells (1·76 %) (percentage of splenic and circulating lymphocytes).

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Bertrand Grenier, Sunday A. Adedokun, Qian Zhang, Xi Chen and Kolapo Ajuwon for their help with the experiments.

The present study was supported by a grant from the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-42-G13) and China Scholarship Council. The funders (China Agricultural University and China Scholarship Council) had no role in the design or analysis of the study and in the writing of this article.

Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture.

USDA is an equal-opportunity employer.

Data reported herein were partially presented at the 2013 PSA Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA (July 2013).

The authors' contributions are as follows: J. T. conducted the animal trial, carried out the sample analyses and wrote the manuscript; S. L. assisted with all the data analyses; T. J. A. contributed to the study design, conduct of the study and preparation of the manuscript; Y. G. and S. D. E. contributed to the experimental design and manuscript preparation.

There is no conflict of interest to be disclosed.

References

1 Popovic, PJ, Zeh, HJ & Ochoa, JB (2007) Arginine and immunity. J Nutr 137, 1681S1686S.Google Scholar
2 Bronte, V & Zanovello, P (2005) Regulation of immune responses by l-arginine metabolism. Nat Rev Immunol 5, 641654.Google Scholar
3 Luiking, YC, Poeze, M, Ramsay, G, et al. (2009) Reduced citrulline production in sepsis is related to diminished de novo arginine and nitric oxide production. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 142152.Google Scholar
4 Calkins, CM, Bensard, DD, Heimbach, JK, et al. (2001) l-Arginine attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced lung chemokine production. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 280, L400L408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Shi, HP, Efron, DT, Most, D, et al. (2000) Supplemental dietary arginine enhances wound healing in normal but not inducible nitric oxide synthase knockout mice. Surgery 128, 374378.Google Scholar
6 Tayade, C, Jaiswal, T, Mishra, S, et al. (2006) l-Arginine stimulates immune response in chickens immunized with intermediate plus strain of infectious bursal disease vaccine. Vaccine 24, 552560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 NRC (1994) Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, 9th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
8 Jahanian, R (2009) Immunological responses as affected by dietary protein and arginine concentrations in starting broiler chicks. Poult Sci 88, 18181824.Google Scholar
9 Roura, E, Homedes, J & Klasing, KC (1992) Prevention of immunologic stress contributes to the growth-permitting ability of dietary antibiotics in chicks. J Nutr 122, 23832390.Google Scholar
10 Munir, K, Muneer, MA, Masaoud, E, et al. (2009) Dietary arginine stimulates humoral and cell-mediated immunity in chickens vaccinated and challenged against hydropericardium syndrome virus. Poult Sci 88, 16291638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Han, J, Liu, Y, Fan, W, et al. (2009) Dietary l-arginine supplementation alleviates immunosuppression induced by cyclophosphamide in weaned pigs. Amino Acids 37, 643651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Coburn, LA, Gong, X, Singh, K, et al. (2012) l-Arginine supplementation improves responses to injury and inflammation in dextran sulfate sodium colitis. PLoS ONE 7, e33546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Zhang, M, Nii, T, Isobe, N, et al. (2012) Expression of Toll-like receptors and effects of lipopolysaccharide on the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokine in the testis and epididymis of roosters. Poult Sci 91, 19972003.Google Scholar
14 Keestra, AM & Putten, JPM (2008) Unique properties of the chicken TLR4/MD-2 complex: selective lipopolysaccharide activation of the MyD88-dependent pathway. J Immunol 181, 43544362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Munyaka, PM, Tactacan, G, Jing, M, et al. (2012) Immunomodulation in young laying hens by dietary folic acid and acute immune responses after challenge with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. Poult Sci 91, 24542463.Google Scholar
16 Lu, YC, Yeh, WC & Ohashi, PS (2008) LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway. Cytokine 42, 145151.Google Scholar
17 Beutler, B (2000) TLR4: central component of the sole mammalian LPS sensor. Curr Opin Immunol 12, 2026.Google Scholar
18 Zhang, X, Zhong, X, Zhou, Y, et al. (2010) Dietary RRR-α-tocopherol succinate attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory cytokines secretion in broiler chicks. Br J Nutr 104, 17961805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Baker, RG, Hayden, MS & Ghosh, S (2011) NF-κB, inflammation, and metabolic disease. Cell Metab 13, 1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Tan, B, Yin, Y, Kong, X, et al. (2010) l-Arginine stimulates proliferation and prevents endotoxin-induced death of intestinal cells. Amino Acids 38, 12271235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 AOAC (2000) Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed. Arlington, VA: AOAC.Google Scholar
22 Park, IJ, Cha, SY, Kang, M, et al. (2013) Immunomodulatory effect of a proanthocyanidin-rich extract from Pinus radiata bark by dosing period in chickens. Poult Sci 92, 352357.Google Scholar
23 Long, FY, Guo, YM, Wang, Z, et al. (2011) Conjugated linoleic acids alleviate infectious bursal disease virus-induced immunosuppression in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 90, 19261933.Google Scholar
24 Watson, JV (2004) Introduction to Flow Cytometry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
25 Dil, N & Qureshi, MA (2002) Differential expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase is associated with differential Toll-like receptor 4 expression in chicken macrophages from different genetic backgrounds. Vet Immunol Immunop 84, 191207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 Simms, D, Cizdziel, PE & Chomczynski, P (1993) TRIzol: a new reagent for optimal single-step isolation of RNA. Focus 15, 532535.Google Scholar
27 Livak, KJ & Schmittgen, TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the $$2^{ - \Delta \Delta C_{t}} $$ method. Methods 25, 402408.Google Scholar
28 Klasing, KC & Barnes, DM (1988) Decreased amino acid requirements of growing chicks due to immunologic stress. J Nutr 118, 11581164.Google Scholar
29 Tan, B, Li, XG, Kong, X, et al. (2009) Dietary l-arginine supplementation enhances the immune status in early-weaned piglets. Amino Acids 37, 323331.Google Scholar
30 Cook, M (2010) A review of science leading to host-targeted antibody strategies for preventing growth depression due to microbial colonization. J Anim Sci 89, 19811990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31 Webel, DM, Johnson, RW & Baker, DH (1998) Lipopolysaccharide-induced reductions in food intake do not decrease the efficiency of lysine and threonine utilization for protein accretion in chickens. J Nutr 128, 17601766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32 Jiang, Z, Schatzmayr, G, Mohnl, M, et al. (2010) Net effect of an acute phase response partial alleviation with probiotic supplementation. Poult Sci 89, 2833.Google Scholar
33 Bansal, V, Syres, KM, Makarenkova, V, et al. (2005) Interactions between fatty acids and arginine metabolism: implications for the design of immune-enhancing diets. JPEN 29, S75S80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34 Ochoa, JB, Makarenkova, V & Bansal, V (2004) A rational use of immune enhancing diets: when should we use dietary arginine supplementation? Nutr Clin Pract 19, 216225.Google Scholar
35 Seifert, S, Fritz, C, Carlini, N, et al. (2011) Modulation of innate and adaptive immunity by the probiotic Bifidobacterium longum PCB133 in turkeys. Poult Sci 90, 22752280.Google Scholar
36 Chuammitri, P, Redmond, SB, Kimura, K, et al. (2011) Heterophil functional responses to dietary immunomodulators vary in genetically distinct chicken lines. Vet Immunol Immunop 142, 219227.Google Scholar
37 Harmon, B (1998) Avian heterophils in inflammation and disease resistance. Poult Sci 77, 972977.Google Scholar
38 Lee, J, Austic, R, Naqi, S, et al. (2002) Dietary arginine intake alters avian leukocyte population distribution during infectious bronchitis challenge. Poult Sci 81, 793798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39 Ibuki, M, Kovacs-Nolan, J, Fukui, K, et al. (2011) β 1–4 Mannobiose enhances Salmonella-killing activity and activates innate immune responses in chicken macrophages. Vet Immunol Immunop 139, 289295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40 Pohlenz, C, Buentello, A, Mwangi, W, et al. (2012) Arginine and glutamine supplementation to culture media improves the performance of various channel catfish immune cells. Fish Shellfish Immun 32, 762768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41 Gong, Y, Hart, E, Shchurin, A, et al. (2008) Inflammatory macrophage migration requires MMP-9 activation by plasminogen in mice. J Clin Invest 118, 30123024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42 Zea, AH, Rodriguez, PC, Culotta, KS, et al. (2004) l-Arginine modulates CD3ζ expression and T cell function in activated human T lymphocytes. Cell immunol 232, 2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43 Rodriguez, PC, Hernandez, CP, Morrow, K, et al. (2010) l-Arginine deprivation regulates cyclin d3 mRNA stability in human T cells by controlling HuR expression. J Immunol 185, 51985204.Google Scholar
44 Jonge, WJ, Kwikkers, KL, Velde, AA, et al. (2002) Arginine deficiency affects early B cell maturation and lymphoid organ development in transgenic mice. J Clin Invest 110, 15391548.Google Scholar
45 Chaturvedi, R, Cheng, Y, Asim, M, et al. (2004) Induction of polyamine oxidase 1 by Helicobacter pylori causes macrophage apoptosis by hydrogen peroxide release and mitochondrial membrane depolarization. J Biol Chem 279, 4016140173.Google Scholar
46 Klasing, K (2007) Nutrition and the immune system. Br Poult Sci 48, 525537.Google Scholar
47 Maroufyan, E, Kasim, A, Ebrahimi, M, et al. (2012) Dietary methionine and n-6/n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid ratio reduce adverse effects of infectious bursal disease in broilers. Poult Sci 91, 21732182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48 Wang, MZ, Ding, LY, Wang, JF, et al. (2011) Effects of n-6:n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid ratio on heterophil:lymphocyte ratio and T lymphocyte subsets in the peripheral blood of the Yangzhou gosling. Poult Sci 90, 824829.Google Scholar
49 Klasing, K & Korver, D (1999) The role of diet in modulating the immune response of broilers: the example of PUFAs. Recent Adv Anim Nutr Aust 12, 16.Google Scholar
50 Opal, SM & DePalo, VA (2000) Anti-inflammatory cytokines. Chest 117, 11621172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51 Dinarello, CA (2000) Proinflammatory cytokines. Chest 118, 503508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52 Bossche, J, Lamers, WH, Koehler, ES, et al. (2012) Pivotal advance: arginase-1-independent polyamine production stimulates the expression of IL-4-induced alternatively activated macrophage markers while inhibiting LPS-induced expression of inflammatory genes. J Leukocyte Biol 91, 685699.Google Scholar
53 Shanmugasundaram, R & Selvaraj, RK (2012) In vivo lipopolysaccharide injection alters CD4+CD25+ cell properties in chickens. J Anim Sci 90, 24982504.Google Scholar
54 Moraes, LA, Piqueras, L & Bishop-Bailey, D (2006) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and inflammation. Pharmacol Therapeut 110, 371385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55 Zhang, HJ, Guo, YM, Yang, Y, et al. (2006) Dietary conjugated linoleic acid enhances spleen PPAR-γ mRNA expression in broiler chicks. Br Poult Sci 47, 726733.Google Scholar
56 Wu, Z, Rothwell, L, Hu, T, et al. (2009) Chicken CD14, unlike mammalian CD14, is transmembrane rather than GPI-anchored. Dev Comp Immunol 33, 97104.Google Scholar
57 Schutt, C (1999) CD14. Int J Biochem Cell B 31, 545549.Google Scholar
58 Kogut, M, He, H & Kaiser, P (2005) Lipopolysaccharide binding protein/CD14/TLR4-dependent recognition of Salmonella LPS induces the functional activation of chicken heterophils and up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine gene expression in these cells. Anim Biotechnol 16, 165181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59 Brownlie, R & Allan, B (2011) Avian Toll-like receptors. Cell Tissue Res 343, 121130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60 Panaro, MA, Cianciulli, A, Gagliardi, N, et al. (2008) CD14 major role during lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in chick embryo cardiomyocytes. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 53, 3545.Google Scholar
61 Dil, N & Qureshi, MA (2002) Involvement of lipopolysaccharide related receptors and nuclear factor κB in differential expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in chicken macrophages from different genetic backgrounds. Vet Immunol Immunop 88, 149161.Google Scholar
62 Leturcq, D, Moriarty, A, Talbott, G, et al. (1996) Antibodies against CD14 protect primates from endotoxin-induced shock. J Clin Invest 98, 1533.Google Scholar
63 Zoete, MR, Keestra, AM, Roszczenko, P, et al. (2010) Activation of human and chicken Toll-like receptors by Campylobacter spp. Infect Immun 78, 12291238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64 O'Neill, LAJ & Bowie, AG (2007) The family of five: TIR-domain-containing adaptors in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 7, 353364.Google Scholar
65 Keestra, AM, Zoete, MR, Bouwman, LI, et al. (2013) Unique features of chicken Toll-like receptors. Dev Comp Immunol 41, 316323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66 Khajali, F, Tahmasebi, M, Hassanpour, H, et al. (2011) Effects of supplementation of canola meal-based diets with arginine on performance, plasma nitric oxide, and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens grown at high altitude. Poult Sci 90, 22872294.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition of the experimental diets used in Expt 1 (g/kg dry diet)

Figure 1

Table 2 Composition of the experimental diets used in Expt 2 (g/kg dry diet)

Figure 2

Table 3 Primers used in real-time quantitative PCR*

Figure 3

Table 4 Growth performance of broilers fed diets containing 1·05, 1·42 or 1·90 % arginine (Arg) with or without lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge from 14 to 21 d of age (Expt 1)* (Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 4

Table 5 Effect of graded supplementation of arginine (Arg) (1·05, 1·42 or 1·90 %) on the phagocytic activity of splenic heterophils and macrophages of broiler chickens on day 7 after continuous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection (Expt 1)* (Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 5

Table 6 Effect of graded supplementation of arginine (Arg) (1·05, 1·42 or 1·90 %) on the percentages of splenic leucocytes expressing cell-surface antigens for CD3, B cells (Bu-1), CD11 and CD14 of broiler chickens on day 7 after continuous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection* (Expt 1) (Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 6

Table 7 Effect of graded supplementation of arginine (Arg) (1·05, 1·42 or 1·90 %) on the relative mRNA expression of pro/anti-inflammatory cytokine and inflammatory regulation genes in the spleen and caecal tonsils of broiler chickens on day 7 after continuous lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection* (Expt 1) (Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 7

Fig. 1 Effect of dietary l-arginine (Arg) concentration on (A) the percentage of circulating B cells (based on gated total lymphocytes) and (B) the percentage of gated total lymphocytes (based on isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells) (21 d, Expt 2). Values are means of ten individual chickens, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,bMean values (■) with unlike letters were significantly different (P≤ 0·05). The percentage of circulating B cells decreased linearly (P= 0·002), quadratically (P= 0·002) and cubically (P= 0·022) with increasing dietary Arg concentrations (P< 0·01). No effect was observed on the percentage of gated total lymphocytes (P>0·05). (B) Linear (P= 0·171), quadratic (P= 0·315) and cubic (P= 0·253).