Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:38:48.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: comparison of 7 d diet diary and food-frequency questionnaire and validity against biomarkers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Eric Brunner ,
Daryth stallone ,
Maneesh Juneja ,
Sheila bingham  and
Michael Marmot
Eric Brunner*
Affiliation:
International Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Daryth stallone
Affiliation:
International Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Maneesh Juneja
Affiliation:
International Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Sheila bingham
Affiliation:
MRC Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, Wellcome Trust/MRC Building, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XY, UK
Michael Marmot
Affiliation:
International Centre for Health and Society, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, 1–19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Eric Brunner, fax +44 20 7813 0242, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to examine the agreement and disagreement between a 7 d diet diary (7DD) and a self-administered machine-readable food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) asking about diet in the previous year, and to validate both methods with biomarkers of nutrient intake. The subjects were an age- and employment-grade-stratified random subsample of London-based civil servants (457 men and 403 women), aged 39–61 years, who completed both a 7DD and a FFQ at phase 3 follow-up (1991–1993) of the Whitehall II study. Mean daily intakes of dietary energy, total fat, saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids, linoleic acid, total carbohydrate excluding fibre, sugars, starch, dietary fibre, protein, vitamin C, vitamin E (as α-tocopherol equivalents), folate, carotenes (as total β-carotene activity), Fe, Ca, Mg, K and alcohol were measured. Serum cholesteryl ester fatty acids (CEFA), plasma α-tocopherol and β-carotene were also measured as biomarkers. Estimates of mean energy intake from the two methods were similar in men, and some 10 % higher according to the FFQ in women. Compared with the 7DD, the FFQ tended to overestimate plant-derived micronutrient intakes (carotenes from FFQ v. 7DD men 2713 (SD 1455) V. 2180 (sd 1188) μg/d, women 3100 (sd 1656) v. 2221 (sd 1180) μg/d, both differences P<0·0001) and to underestimate fat intake. Against plasma β-carotene/cholesterol, carotene intake was as well estimated by the FFQ as the 7DD (Spearman rank correlations, men 0·32 v. 0·30, women 0·27 v. 0·22, all P≤0·0001, energy-adjusted data). Ranking of participants by other nutrient intakes tended to be of the same order according to the two dietary methods, e.g. rank correlations for CEFA linoleic acid against FFQ and 7DD estimates respectively, men 0·38 v. 0·41, women 0·53 v. 0·62, all P≤0·0001, energy-adjusted % fat). For α-tocopherol there were no correlations between plasma level and estimated intakes by either dietary method. Quartile agreement for energy-adjusted nutrient intakes between the two self-report methods was in the range 37–50 % for men and 32–44 % for women, and for alcohol, 57 % in both sexes. Disagreement (misclassification into extreme quartiles of intake) was in the range 0–6 % for both sexes. The dietary methods yielded similar prevalences (about 34 %) of low energy reporters. The two methods show satisfactory agreement, together with an expected level of systematic differences, in their estimates of nutrient intake. Against the available biomarkers, the machine-readable FFQ performed well in comparison with the manually coded 7DD in this study population. For both methods, regression-based adjustment of nutrient intake to mean dietary energy intake by gender appears on balance to be the optimal approach to data presentation and analysis, in view of the complex problem of low energy reporting.

Keywords

Diet surveysBiasDietary fatsMicronutrientsResearch methodology
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , September 2001 , pp. 405 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2001

References

Armstrong, NC, Paganga, G, Brunner, EJ, Miller, JN, Nanchahal, K, Shipley, MJ, Rice-Evans, CA, Marmot, MG & Diplock, AT (1997) Reference values for α-tocopherol and β-carotene in the Whitehall II Study. Free Radical Research 27, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beksinska, M, Yea, L & Brunner, EJ (1995) Whitehall II Study Manual for Screening Examination 1991–93, London: UCL, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health.Google Scholar
Bingham, SA (1991) Limitations of the various methods for collecting dietary intake data. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 35, 117–127.Google Scholar
Bingham, SA & Day, NE (1997) Using biochemical markers to assess the validity of prospective dietary assessment methods and the effect of energy adjustment. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 65, 1130S–1137S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bingham, SA, Gill, C, Welch, A, Cassidy, A, Runswick, SA, Oakes, S, Lubin, R, Thurnham, DI, Key, TJA, Roe, L, Khaw, K & Day, NE (1997) Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers. Epidemiology 26, S137–S151.Google ScholarPubMed
Black, AE, Goldberg, GR, Jebb, SA & Prentice, AM (1991) Evaluating dietary surveys against energy requirements. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 50, 33A.Google Scholar
Braddon, FEM, Wadsworth, MEJ, Davies, JMC & Cripps, HA (1988) Social and regional differences in food and alcohol consumption and their measurement in a national birth cohort. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 42, 341–349.Google Scholar
Brunner, EJ (1997) Inequalities in diet and health. In Diet, Nutrition and Chronic Disease: Lessons from Contrasting Worlds, 1st ed., [Shetty, P and McPherson, K, editors]. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brunner, EJ, Marmot, MG, Nanchahal, K, Shipley, MJ, Stansfeld, SA, Juneja, M & Alberti, KGMM (1997) Social inequality in coronary risk: central obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Evidence from the Whitehall II study. Diabetologia 40, 1341–1349.Google Scholar
Buttriss, JL & Diplock, AT (1984) High-performance liquid chromatography methods for vitamin E in tissues. Methods in Enzymology 105, 131–138.Google Scholar
Chan, W, Brown, J & Buss, DH (1994) Miscellaneous Foods. Fourth Supplement to the 5th Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, W, Brown, J & Lee, SM (1995) Meat, Poultry and Game. Supplement to the 5th Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, GR, Black, A, Jebb, E, Cole, TJ, Murgatroyd, PR, Coward, WA & Prentice, AM (1991) Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 45, 569–591.Google Scholar
Holland, B, Brown, J & Buss, DH (1993) Fish and Fish Products. Third Supplement to the 5th Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, B, Welch, AA & Buss, DH (1988) Cereals and Cereal Products. Third Supplement to the 4th Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods.Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
Holland, B, Welch, AA & Buss, DH (1989) Milk Products and Eggs. Fourth Supplement to the 4th Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
Holland, B, Welch, AA & Buss, DH (1991 b) Vegetables, Herbs and Spices. Fifth Supplement to the 4th Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, B, Welch, AA & Buss, DH (1992 a) Fruit and Nuts. First Supplement to the 5th Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, B, Welch, AA & Buss, DH (1992 b) Vegetable Dishes. Second Supplement to the 5th Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
Holland, B, Welch, AA, Unwin, ID, Buss, DH, Paul, AA & Southgate, DAT (1991 a) McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
Kipnis, V, Freedman, LS, Brown, CC, Hartman, A, Schatzkin, A & Wacholder, S (1993) Interpretation of energy adjustment models for nutritional epidemiology. American Journal of Epidemiology 137, 1376–1380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marmot, MG, Davey Smith, G, Stansfeld, SA, Patel, C, North, F, Head, J, White, I, Brunner, EJ & Feeney, A (1991) Health inequalities among British Civil Servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet 337, 1387–1393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, AA & Southgate, DAT (1978) McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. 4th ed. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Pryer, JA, Brunner, EJ, Elliott, P, Nichols, R, Dimond, H & Marmot, MG (1995) Who complied with COMA 1984 dietary fat recommendations among a nationally representative sample of British adults in 1986–7 and what do they eat? European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 49, 718–728.Google ScholarPubMed
Schofield, WN, Schofield, C & James, WPT (1985) Basal metabolic rate. Human Nutrition: Clinical Nutrition 39C, Suppl. 1, 1–96.Google Scholar
Smith, AF (1993) Cognitive psychological issues of relevance to the validity of dietary reports. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 47, Suppl. 2, S6–S18.Google Scholar
Stallone, DD, Brunner, EJ, Bingham, SA & Marmot, MG (1997) Dietary assessment in Whitehall II. The influence of reporting bias on apparent socioeconomic variation in nutrient intakes. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 51, 815–825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willett, W (1998) Nutritional Epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willett, WC, Sampson, L, Stampfer, MJ, Rosner, B, Bain, C, Witschi, J, Hennekens, CH & Speizer, FE (1985) Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. American Journal of Epidemiology 122, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willett, WC & Stampfer, MJ (1986) Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses. American Journal of Epidemiology 124, 17–27.Google Scholar