Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T01:16:23.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consumption of fruits and vegetables among adolescents: a multi-national comparison of eleven countries in the Eastern Mediterranean Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2016

M. F. Al Ani
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, PO Box 34, Al Khoud, Muscat 123, Oman
L. K. Al Subhi*
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, PO Box 34, Al Khoud, Muscat 123, Oman
S. Bose
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Economics, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman, PO Box 34, Al Khoud, Muscat 123, Oman
*
*Corresponding author: L. K. Al Subhi, fax +968 2441 3418, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Regional cross-country profile of fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption is lacking in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR). This study examines the prevalence and differences of consuming F&V ≥5 times/d among adolescents in eleven EMR countries, and also describes differences in the proportions of taking F&V ≥5 times/d by sex, age and BMI. The study included 26 328 school adolescents (13–15 years) with complete data on consumption of F&V, age, sex, weight and height taken from the Global School-based Student Health Survey conducted in the EMR between 2005 and 2009. Overall, only 19·4 % of adolescents reported consuming F&V ≥5 times/d. The highest prevalence was reported in Djibouti (40·4 %) and the lowest was reported in Pakistan (10·0 %). Statistically significant differences in prevalence were observed across countries (P<0·05). With the exception of Oman, Libya and Djibouti, significantly more males than females ate F&V ≥5 times/d. Proportion of students consuming F&V ≥5 times/d also varied significantly in all counties based on BMI (P<0·0001), with students within normal BMI having the highest frequency. A negative trend was observed between age and the prevalence of taking F&V ≥5 times/d in most of the eleven EMR countries but Jordan, Djibouti and Morocco. The prevalence of adequate intake of F&V was low in the eleven EMR countries. There is a need for interventions to increase the prevalence of adolescents consuming F&V ≥5 times/d. Interventions should take into consideration psychosocial, environmental and socio-environmental factors influencing F&V intake within countries.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

Fruits and vegetables (F&V) are essential components of a healthy diet in meeting requirements for growth, development and maintenance throughout the life cycle. Adequate daily intake of the F&V has been associated with reduced risks of CVD( Reference Mikkila, Rasanen and Raitakari 1 Reference Dauchet, Amouyel and Hercberg 3 ), stroke( Reference Bazzano, He and Ogden 4 ), type 2 diabetes( Reference Carter, Gray and Troughton 5 ) and certain types of cancer( Reference Maynard, Gunnell and Emmett 6 , Reference Papas, Giovannucci and Platz 7 ), all of which are major causes of mortality and morbidity in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR)( Reference Brug, Tak and Te Velde 8 ). In addition, increased intake of F&V promotes satiety, decreases energy intakes and has been associated with better weight-related outcomes and successful weight-loss treatment for adolescents( Reference Nystrom, Schmitz and Perry 9 ).

The 2002 Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases recommends a minimum of 400 g/d of F&V, an equivalent of ≥5 servings of F&V/d. The recommendation excludes potatoes and other starchy tubers( 10 ). As the protective role of F&V on non-communicable diseases (NCD) became well established, the World Health Organization( 11 ) adopted an initiative in 2003 to promote their consumption and called to standardise their definitions to facilitate multi-national comparison. In 2004, the World Health Assembly adopted the Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health, which aims to promote F&V consumption around the world and assists member states in implementing national strategies emphasising in improving diet to reduce diseases and deaths associated with them( 12 ).

Although there is a trend for an increased global production of fifteen types of fruits and fifteen types of vegetables between 1998 and 2003( 13 ) and despite the evident benefits of adequate intake of F&V, multi-national Western dietary surveys indicate that most adolescents are not consuming the recommended amounts of F&V( Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Story and Hannan 14 Reference Vereecken, De Henauw and Maes 17 ). Longitudinal trends show that US adolescents decreased their daily intake of F&V along the spectrum of adolescence( Reference Larson, Neumark-Sztainer and Hannan 18 ). Only 9 and 14 % of Chinese adolescents (n 2977) consumed the minimum recommended daily intakes of F&V( Reference Zhang, Chen and Chen 19 ). Among Ghanaian adolescents, 56 % (n 1195) rarely ate fruits and 48 % rarely ate vegetables( Reference Doku, Koivusilta and Raisamo 20 ). Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) data from seven developing African countries revealed that 77·5 % of adolescents (n 17 656) did not meet the daily recommended intake of F&V( Reference Peltzer and Pengpid 21 ).

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is limited information available on the prevalence of F&V consumption among adolescents in EMR countries. EMR includes twenty-two diverse countries from two continents – Asia and Africa. Differences in risk behaviours such as inadequate intake of F&V have not been studied in the region. In addition, potential factors associated with F&V consumption are not well researched in the region.

The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to estimate differences in the proportion of 13–15-year-old adolescents who reported consuming F&V ≥5 times/d across eleven EMR countries based on GSHS data, (2) to explore potential within-country differences in proportions of students taking F&V ≥5 times/d based on sex, age and BMI groups of the study sample.

Methods

Study data

The present study is based on a large cross-section of school students from eleven countries in EMR that participated in the GSHS between 2005 and 2009. The GSHS is a collaborative surveillance project coordinated by the WHO with the goal of helping countries measure and assess behavioural risk factors and protective factors among students aged 13–17 years( 22 , 23 ).

The GSHS is based on voluntary participation of nations. A two-staged cluster sampling standardised process is applied to produce representative country samples. First, schools are selected with probability proportional to sample size. Second, classes within schools are randomly selected. All students in the sampled classes are eligible to participate irrespective of age. Data are collected using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of ten sets of core questions that allow cross-country comparison, core-expanded questions and country-specific questions. Core sets address leading causes of morbidity and mortality among children and adults worldwide. One of the core sets is ‘dietary behaviours’, which is the source of data for the present study. Questionnaires were translated into appropriate languages and pilot tested for comprehension. Students in selected classes completed the survey during one regular period using computer-scannable answer sheets. Additional details on the GSHS methodology and study design are described elsewhere( 22 , 23 ).

By the end of January 2012, there were only eleven publically available country data sets (twenty-three) from the EMR countries that undertook the GSHS, and thus were included in this study. One country – Jordan – had data sets for 2 years, 2004 and 2007, and only the latest set was included to minimise the gaps of years among counties. The remaining countries had only one data set. The collective sample from the eleven countries was 47 256 school students. A stepwise exclusion process was applied. Observations with missing response to the core questions of fruit or vegetable consumption were excluded. Subsequently, students with missing age, sex, weight or height were excluded as they are all required to calculate the BMI. Finally, students aged <13 and >15 years were excluded, as the objective of the study was to describe the F&V consumption patterns of schoolchildren aged between 13 and 15 years. As a result, the valid study sample included 26 328 adolescents, 55·7 % of the initial sample.

BMI (weight (kg)/height (m2)) was calculated using the self-reported weight and height information. Age- and sex-specific z scores for BMI of the study sample were calculated using the recommended 2007 least median of squares (LMS) method. BMI was classified based on the z score cut-off values, with >+1 sd being overweight, +1 to −2 sd being normal weight and<−2 sd being underweight( 24 , 25 ). Severe underweight and obesity were clustered with underweight and overweight, respectively.

Total country population and population of the adolescents aged 13–15 years, by GSHS year of survey, were obtained from the World Bank. Annual production, export and import of F&V for the respective years of the GSHS were obtained using the agriculture item groups ‘fruit excl melons, total’ and ‘vegetables and melons, total’ from FAOSTAT at (http://faostat.fao.org/site/291/default.aspx). The data were used to calculate the per capita availability of F&V of each country for the year of GSHS (Table 3).

Assessing consumption of fruits and vegetables

The dietary behaviours core module in version 2003–2008 of the GSHS has five questions and that of version 2009–2012 has seven questions. Both versions have two identical questions on F&V consumption( 22 , 23 ) where respondents were asked the following:

  • During the past 30 d, how many times per day did you usually eat fruits?, and

  • During the past 30 d, how many times per day did you usually eat vegetables?

Both questions were based on six response categories ranging from I did not eat, <1 time/d, 1 time/d, 2 times/d, 3 times/d, 4 times/d to ≥5 times/d. Country-specific examples of F&V were referenced in both questions( 10 ).

The recommended daily intake of F&V based on the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Diet, Nutrition and Prevention of Chronic Diseases is a minimum of 400 g of F&V/d (excluding potatoes and other starchy tubers); an equivalent of ≥5 servings/d. However, the two questions in the GSHS noted above only provide frequency of intake rather than servings per day. The per day frequency of intake of F&V does not represent the actual servings, whereas the term serving/day implies both frequency and quantity of intake. For the purpose of this study, and because the GSHS data only provide frequency of daily intake of F&V with no reference to portion sizes, consumption of F&V ≥5 times/d was used as a general and proxy cut-off measure for adequate intake of F&V.

Statistical analyses

The χ 2 statistic was used to investigate whether the sample proportions with reference to ‘adequate F&V consumption among adolescents’ (≥ 5 servings/d) differ significantly across countries. A P value of <0·05 was considered statistically significant. Next, the Marascuilo procedure( Reference Marascuilo 26 ) was used to identify the proportions that differ significantly by comparing all possible pairs of proportions, and the results are presented in Table 4. Moreover, χ 2 statistic was used to investigate within-country differences in the proportion of adolescents consuming F&V ≥5 times/d based on age, sex and BMI groups (Table 5). Statistical analyses were carried out using Microsoft Excel and SPSS 19.

Results

The overall initial response rate of the GSHS in the eleven EMR countries was 87·9 %. The largest response rate was from Jordan (99·8 %) and the lowest was from Pakistan (76 %). The final valid study sample after all exclusions was 26 328 (55·7 %) of the total initial sample (Table 1). The characteristics of the study population before and after exclusion are shown in Table 2. There were more male (55 %) than female adolescents in the valid sample. The majority of students (66·9 %) fall within the normal weight BMI. On the basis of the gross national incomes (GNI) of the year of data collection, seven of the countries were classified in either low- or lower-middle income category. Across the pooled sample, only 19·4 % of adolescents reported consuming F&V ≥5 times/d. Djibouti as a lower middle-income country, with a low per capita availability of F&V (0·094 tonnes/year), had the highest reported prevalence of adolescents (40·4 %, n 842) reported eating F&V ≥5 times/d. Pakistan had the lowest per capita availability of F&V (0·068) as well as the lowest prevalence of adolescents consuming F&V ≥5 times/d (10·0 %, n 4722). It is interesting to note that Pakistan ranked second, after Egypt, in producing (1 192 330 tonnes) and third in exporting F&V (912 873 tonnes); nevertheless, it ranked first in F&V imports and had the lowest per capita availability of F&V. UAE, the only high-income country that ranked second after Pakistan in imports of F&V, had the highest per capita availability (0·409) (Table 3).

Table 1 Global School-based Student Health Survey year of data collection, initial and valid sample sizes of eleven Eastern Mediterranean Region countries (Numbers and percentages)

Table 2 Characteristics of the study sample before and after exclusionFootnote * (Numbers and percentages)

* n before elimination for the BMI was not calculated as the calculation for the BMI according to the (z scores) method relies on critical points of sex and age. The exclusion of missed data on sex or age took place before BMI was calculated.

Table 3 Gross national income (GNI), population and per capita availability of fruits and vegetables (F&V) and prevalence of consuming F&V ≥5 times/d in eleven Eastern Mediterranean Region countries based on Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) year of data collection

There were a number of cross-country statistically significant differences in the prevalence of adolescents reporting consuming F&V ≥5 times/d. For instance, the prevalence in the UAE was significantly lower (P<0·0001) than that of Oman, Lebanon, Jordan, Djibouti, Morocco and Tunisia. On the other hand, it was significantly higher (P<0·0001) than that of Libya and Pakistan. Pakistan had significantly (P<0·0001) lower prevalence (10·0 %) of adolescents consuming F&V ≥5 times/d compared with all countries except Libya (Table 4).

Table 4 Differences in prevalence of adolescents’ consumption of fruits and vegetables among eleven Eastern Mediterranean Region countriesFootnote

* Significantly different: P<0·05.

For each country ‘i’, the number in the first row indicates the observed difference in sample proportions with country ‘j’ and the number in the second row indicates the corresponding P values.

Comparisons of frequencies within age, sex and BMI categories are presented in Table 5. Overall, the proportion of students taking F&V ≥5 times/d tended to decrease as age increased; more 13-year-old (n 1806) and 14-year-old (n 1836) adolescents reported consuming F&V ≥5 times/d than 15-year-old students (n 1470). When countries were examined separately, a similar trend was found in seven of the countries. However, in the case of Jordan, Djibouti and Morocco, the proportions of teens consuming F&V ≥5 times/d increased with age, whereas it appeared to fluctuate in Pakistan with more14-year-old adolescents (n 215) meeting the cut-off intake frequency for F&V. For most of the countries, there are significant differences (P<0·0001) in the proportion of adolescents consuming F&V ≥5 times/d in the three age groups. Exceptions were seen in four countries – Oman, Libya, Morocco and Yemen – where the frequencies among the three age groups were not significant at P<5 %. As for the sex factor, the total results show that more males (n 2972) than females (n 2140) reported intake of F&V ≥5 times/d; all countries showed similar trends except for Libya. The differences in the proportions between males and females were significant (P<0·04–P<0·0001) within all counties but three – Oman, Libya and Djibouti. With respect to BMI, more adolescents with normal BMI (n 3346) than underweight (n 314) and overweight (n 1452) adolescents met the cut-off for adequate intake of F&V. The observed pattern was consistent and significant within all countries (P<0·0001).

Table 5 Within-country differences in proportions of fruit and vegetable consumption by age, sex and BMI

Discussion

It should be noted that the study only examined the prevalence of adequate consumption of F&V among adolescents using a proxy approach based on the frequency of intake per day. The GSHS data on F&V consumption is based on reported daily frequency of intake with no reference to portion sizes. Thus, meeting the criteria of consuming F&V ≥5 times/d is not equivalent to consuming F&V ≥5 servings/d. Moreover, the GSHS data are obtained by means of a self-reported questionnaire – a method that is subject to recall errors and under-/over-reporting( Reference De Vriendt, Huybrechts and Ottevaere 27 ). Nevertheless, the study is based on a large sample size from the GSHS that has a sound sampling process. Moreover, it included eleven EMR countries with diverse GNI and variable per capita availability of F&V.

The observed lack of trend in the relationship between adequate F&V consumption among adolescents and the GNI of the eleven EMR countries is not consistent with that reported by others among adults. On the basis of the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology study, a positive trend between healthy eating (including intake of higher amounts of F&V) and the gross domestic product (GDP) of countries has been noted; consumption of F&V increased with increased GDP( Reference Teo, Lear and Islam 28 ). In addition, the per capita availability of F&V in the eleven countries was not seen to be in synchrony with the patterns of the prevalence of consumption. Such an observation could be affected by a lack of infrastructure of food supply chains of highly perishable commodities( 29 ). It is strategically important to understand the inter-related aspects of accessibility and affordability and other contributing factors with consumption of F&V in these countries( Reference Rahim, Sibai and Khader 30 ). EMR countries could explore available opportunities to expand availability of F&V presented by Aid for Trade that has a built-in venue to increase F&V supply( Reference Lachat, Otchere and Roberfroid 31 ).

As noted, only 19·4 % of adolescents in the eleven EMR countries met the cut-off for F&V consumption. These findings cause concern about the inadequacy of F&V intake among adolescents in light of the association between F&V consumption and NCD diseases (1–7). Overall, the prevalence of taking F&V ≥5 times/d in the eleven EMR countries is comparable with that reported in other nations. Using the same cut-off for adequate F&V, only 22·3 % of American adolescents in the YRBS-2009 study consumed an adequate amount of F&V per day( Reference Eaton, Kann and Kinchen 32 ). In Brazil, only 23 % of the teens consumed 5 F&V/d( Reference Rieth, Moreira and Fuchs 33 ).

Intake of F&V in other countries within EMR is even lower. Although not included in the present study, Kuwaiti male and female adolescents were reported to consume vegetables (3·8 v. 3·5 times/week) and fruits (3·4 v. 2·8 times/week), respectively. The prevalence of F&V intake of ≥7 times/week was only reported in 26 v. 22·1 % for vegetables and 17·5 v. 11·8 % for fruits for males and females, respectively( Reference Allafi, Al-Haifi and Al-Fayez 34 ). The weekly mean frequency is extremely low, indicating a lower daily and therefore inadequate intake in this group. It is interesting to note that the intake frequency of vegetables is much higher than that of fruits in Kuwaiti adolescents. Such an observation could be attributed to not excluding potatoes in such types of studies. In Australian adolescents, the prevalence of adequate intake of both F&V decreased substantially when juices and potatoes were excluded( 35 ). Variations in assessment approaches should be accounted for when comparing results.

The propensity for more males reporting intake of F&V ≥5 times/d seen in the present study is also similar to that of adolescents in the USA, where more males (23·9 %) consumed adequate F&V compared with females (20·5 %) in the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS)-2009 study( Reference Eaton, Kann and Kinchen 32 ). Australian male adolescents had slightly higher intake than females (based on ≥1–3 and ≥2–4 servings/d of F&V, respectively)( 35 ). Kuwaiti male teens were also reported to have significantly higher mean weekly intake frequency of vegetables (P=0·02) and fruits (P=0·001) than female teens( Reference Allafi, Al-Haifi and Al-Fayez 34 ). Nevertheless, female adolescents in other nations including Palestine( Reference Al Sabbah, Vereecken and Kolsteren 36 ), USA( Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Story and Hannan 14 ) and Norway( Reference Bere, Brug and Klepp 37 ) were reported to be more prevalent in consuming F&V with different criteria for assessing adequate F&V intake.

Decreased intake with increased age seen in the eleven EMR counties is also reported among adolescents in other areas including the USA( Reference Larson, Neumark-Sztainer and Hannan 18 , Reference Eaton, Kann and Kinchen 32 ) and Australia( 35 ). The adverse relationship between F&V intake and age has been shown to start from early adolescence( Reference Di Noia and Contento 38 ) and may persist into late adolescence and adulthood( Reference Mikkila, Rasanen and Raitakari 1 , Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Story and Hannan 14 , Reference Hall, Moore and Harper 39 ). Several factors could be behind the decreased tendency of consuming adequate F&V in this cycle of life. As age increases, there is a lower preference towards F&V and a lower frequency of family dinners( Reference Granner, Sargent and Calderon 40 ). The observed trend with BMI in this regional study is also in line with that seen among seventh-grade adolescents from the Teens Eating for Energy and Nutrition at School (TEENS) study and might be related to perceptions about weight. Boys and girls perceived as underweight significantly ate fewer servings of F&V per day than those perceived to be in the normal weight group. In addition, boys and girls perceived to be overweight consumed significantly fewer servings of F&V per day than those having normal weight( Reference Nystrom, Schmitz and Perry 9 ). Among 11-year-old Greek children, BMI did not associate with F&V intake significantly( Reference Koui and Jago 41 ). Similar to what is noted in the present study was reported in a large sample (n 246 995) of middle-aged Australian men and women. Compared with the overweight group, normal weight men were more likely to be in the highest vegetables, fruits and combined F&V intake quartiles and were less likely to have 5 servings of F&V/d( Reference Charlton, Kowal and Soriano 42 ). An increased intake of F&V may promote BMI reduction among adolescents( Reference Hart, Jelalian and Raynor 43 ) and may be an effective dietary strategy to control weight and reduce the risk of obesity. However, a study on the association between F&V intake and a change in BMI did not show a beneficial effect, and thus it was suggested that F&V recommendations should not be based on a beneficial effect on weight regulation( Reference Field, Gillman and Rosner 44 ).

Aside from age, sex and BMI, correlates of F&V intake among adolescent might be variable and inter-related. Less is known about the socio-economic, cultural, psychosocial and environmental determinants of the consumption of F&V among adolescents in the EMR. Findings from the project Eating Among Teens (EAT) interdicted that home availability explained 45 % and test preference explained 28 % of the variances in F&V intake among adolescents( Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Wall and Perry 45 ). Self-efficacy, parent and peer modelling, family and peer normative beliefs and social and health outcome expectations were found to be correlated with F&V intake among adolescents( Reference Granner and Evans 46 ), whereas the socio-environmental factors related to school environment were availability and accessibility of F&V, nutrition education and food safety( Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Story and Hannan 14 , Reference Nago, Verstraeten and Lachat 47 ). Such factors have not been evaluated, and further studies are warranted to explore the inter-association among them and intake of F&V in the EMR countries.

Interpretation of results from studies assessing adequate intake of F&V needs to be carried out in a careful manner. It is clear that consumption of French fries and juices are popular among adolescents, and could inflate the estimated reported intake. The mean vegetable servings for American female adolescents decreased from 2 (sd 1·6) to 1·8 (sd 1·6) servings/d and that for male adolescents dropped from 1·8 (sd 1·6) to 1·6 (sd 1·5) servings/d when French fries were excluded( Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Story and Hannan 14 ). The proportion of Australian children aged 9–16 years consuming ≥2–4 servings/d of vegetables decreased from 19 % to only 2 % when potatoes were excluded. Likewise, the proportion of children reported consuming ≥1–3 servings/d of fruits declined from 90 to 51 % after exclusion of fruit juices among 9–13-year-old children and declined from 24 to 1 % among 14–16-year-old adolescents( 35 ). It is worth noting that the definition of fruit juice is very much distorted among the general public and might not mean 100 % juice but fruit drinks, with mass processed products falling under juices. Thus, although a product might only contain no more than 30 % juice concentrate by volume, the public perceives such products as fruit juices. Therefore, studies should carefully consider these aspects that might inflate the actual intake of F&V.

Adolescence is characterised by rapid growth and increased nutrient needs; with that, it is an important time to intervene with F&V intake to meet nutrient needs and to develop dietary patterns that may persist into adulthood. Efforts to increase F&V intake through promotion initiatives have been proved effective( Reference Ammerman, Lindquist and Lohr 48 , Reference Knai, Pomerleau and Lock 49 ). The WHO noted insufficient policy response and progress in curbing the burden of NCD; it has been and is calling countries to increase action against NCD risk factors, including unhealthy diet, to reduce the preventable and avoidable burden of morbidity, mortality and disability due to NCD. A multi-sectoral collaboration and cooperation at national, regional and global levels is called by WHO for populations to reach the highest attainable standards of health and productivity at every age( 50 ).

Availability of policy documents for national NCD policies, programmes and action plans in low- and middle-income WHO member countries (n 140) is not clear. Only 47 % of such countries were found to have policy documents, but only a small fraction of them proposed actions to promote healthier diets and physical activity. National policy actions to improve F&V consumption were particularly low in low- and middle-income EMR countries; only three countries were reported to have such documents that targeted the general public. Djibouti, which has the highest prevalence of adolescents (40·4 %) taking F&V ≥5 times/d, has a document on a national policy action to promote family plantations and consumption of F&V. Jordan, ranked fifth among the eleven EMR countries in the prevalence (27·1 %) of F&V intake, was found to have a national policy action to organise campaigns emphasising the importance of F&V. Policy action in Iran was to address poor dietary habits and promote consumption of F&V( Reference Lachat, Otchere and Roberfroid 31 ). The impact of such action plans has to be studied to understand their effectiveness, to share information and to establish databases on best practices on national and regional action plans in promoting adequate intake of F&V. Other EMR countries should adapt policies aiming to increase F&V intake and prioritise action plans along such policies if a reduction of the low prevalence of F&V intake is desired to reduce the impact of such a modifiable risk factor associated with NCD.

The great majority of adolescents in the eleven EMR counties did not meet the adequate F&V consumption based on the proxy of eating F&V ≥5 times/d. Interventions in the EMR countries should be prioritised to increase the intake of F&V among adolescents. Adolescents are swamped with palatable low-dense nutrient foods. Understanding limitations would be strategically important if governments are to intervene in order to increase the prevalence of adequate F&V intake. Interventions should take into consideration the psychosocial, environmental and socio-environmental factors influencing F&V intake within countries. Further research is needed to identify effective interventions and policy approaches geared towards improving the availability and accessibility of F&V as well as increasing their consumption in EMR countries.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the reviewers who have contributed to shape this article.

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Authors of this study have contributed as follows – M. F. A. A. and L. K. A. S.: formulated the research questions. M. F. A. A.: conception of the idea, data extraction and coding and contributed to writing the initial draft. L. K. A. S.: guided data processing, and wrote the final version of the article. S. B.: data analyses, wrote the methods and critically reviewed the article.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Mikkila, V, Rasanen, L, Raitakari, OT, et al. (2005) Consistent dietary patterns identified from childhood to adulthood: the cardiovascular risk in young finns study. Br J Nutr 93, 923931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Mirmiran, P, Noori, N, Zavareh, MB, et al. (2009) Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Metabolism 58, 460468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Dauchet, L, Amouyel, P, Hercberg, S, et al. (2006) Fruit and vegetable consumption and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Nutr 136, 25882593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Bazzano, LA, He, J, Ogden, LG, et al. (2002) Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of cardiovascular disease in US adults: the first national health and nutrition examination survey epidemiologic follow-up study. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 9399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Carter, P, Gray, LJ, Troughton, J, et al. (2010) Fruit and vegetable intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 341, c4229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Maynard, M, Gunnell, D, Emmett, P, et al. (2003) Fruit, vegetables, and antioxidants in childhood and risk of adult cancer: the Boyd Orr cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health 57, 218225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Papas, MA, Giovannucci, E & Platz, EA (2004) Fiber from fruit and colorectal neoplasia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13, 12671270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Brug, J, Tak, NI, Te Velde, SJ, et al. (2008) Taste preferences, liking and other factors related to fruit and vegetable intakes among schoolchildren: results from observational studies. Br J Nutr 29, Suppl. 1, S7S14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Nystrom, AA, Schmitz, KH, Perry, CL, et al. (2005) The relationship of weight-related perceptions, goals, and behaviors with fruit and vegetable consumption in young adolescents. Prev Med 40, 203208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. World Health Organization (2003) Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. WHO Technical Report Series. Geneva: WHO. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/trs916/en/ (accessed November 2014).Google Scholar
11. World Health Organization (2003) Fruit and Vegetable Promotion Initiative/A Meeting Report/25-27/08/03. Geneva: WHO. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/f&v_promotion_initiative_report.pdf (accessed November 2014).Google Scholar
12. World Health Organization (2013) Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health: Diet and Physical Activity: A Public Health Priority. Geneva: WHO. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/en/ (accessed June 2013).Google Scholar
13. World Health Organization & Food and Agriculture Organization (2004) Fruit and Vegetables for Health: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Workshop, 1–3 September 2004, Kobe, Japan. Geneva: WHO and FAO; www.fao.org/ag/magazine/FAO-WHO-FV.pdf (accessed November 2014).Google Scholar
14. Neumark-Sztainer, D, Story, M, Hannan, PJ, et al. (2002) Overweight status and eating patterns among adolescents: where do youths stand in comparison with the healthy people 2010 objectives? Am J Public Health 92, 844851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2010) Youth risk behavior surveillance – United States, 2009. MMWR Surveill Summ 59, 1148.Google Scholar
16. Guenther, PM, Dodd, KW, Reedy, J, et al. (2006) Most Americans eat much less than recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables. J Am Diet Assoc 106, 13711379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Vereecken, CA, De Henauw, S & Maes, L (2005) Adolescents’ food habits: results of the health behaviour in school-aged children survey. Br J Nutr 94, 423431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Larson, NI, Neumark-Sztainer, D, Hannan, PJ, et al. (2007) Trends in adolescent fruit and vegetable consumption, 1999–2004: project EAT. Am J Prev Med 32, 147150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Zhang, C-X, Chen, Y-M, Chen, W-Q, et al. (2012) Food group intake among adolescents in Guangzhou city compared with the Chinese dietary guidelines. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 21, 450456.Google ScholarPubMed
20. Doku, D, Koivusilta, L, Raisamo, S, et al. (2011) Socio-economic differences in adolescents’ breakfast eating, fruit and vegetable consumption and physical activity in Ghana. Public Health Nutr 16, 864869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Peltzer, K & Pengpid, S (2010) Fruits and vegetables consumption and associated factors among in-school adolescents in seven African countries. Int J Public Health 55, 669678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012) Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS). Atlanta, GA: United States Centers for Disease Control. www.cdc.gov/gshs (accessed August 2012).Google Scholar
23. World Health Organization (2012) Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS). http://www.who.int/chp/gshs/en (accessed August 2012).Google Scholar
24. World Health Organization (2012) Computation of centiles and Z-scores for height-for-age, weight-for-age and BMI-for-age. http://www.who.int/growthref/computation.pdf (accessed August 2012).Google Scholar
25. World Health Organization (2012) Growth reference 5–19 years. http://www.who.int/growthref/who2007_bmi_for_age/en/index.html (accessed August 2012).Google Scholar
26. Marascuilo, LA (1966) Large-sample multiple comparisons. Psychol Bull 65, 280290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. De Vriendt, T, Huybrechts, I, Ottevaere, C, et al. (2009) Validity of self-reported weight and height of adolescents, its impact on classification into BMI-categories and the association with weighing behaviour. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6, 26962711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Teo, K, Lear, S, Islam, S, et al. (2013) Prevalence of a healthy lifestyle among individuals with cardiovascular disease in high-, middle- and low-income countries: the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. JAMA 309, 16131621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. The Economist Intelligence Unit (2014) Special report: food loss and its intersection with food security. A report from The Economist Intelligence Unit. http://foodsecurityindex.eiu.com/ (accessed November 2014).Google Scholar
30. Rahim, HFA, Sibai, A, Khader, Y, et al. (2014) Non-communicable diseases in the Arab world. Lancet 383, 356367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Lachat, C, Otchere, S, Roberfroid, D, et al. (2013) Diet and physical activity for the prevention of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic policy review. PLoS Med 10, e1001465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Eaton, DK, Kann, L, Kinchen, S, et al. (2010) Youth risk behavior surveillance-United States, 2009. MMWR Surveill Summ 59, 1142.Google ScholarPubMed
33. Rieth, MA, Moreira, MB, Fuchs, FD, et al. (2012) Fruits and vegetables intake and characteristics associated among adolescents from Southern Brazil. Nutr J 11, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. Allafi, A, Al-Haifi, AR, Al-Fayez, MA, et al. (2014) Physical activity, sedentary behaviours and dietary habits among kuwaiti adolescents: gender differences. Public Health Nutr. 17, 20452052.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, Preventative Health National Research Flagship & The University of South Australia (2007) Australian National Children’s Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey-Main Findings. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, Astralina Food and Grocery Council, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/8F4516D5FAC0700ACA257BF0001E0109/$File/childrens-nut-phys-survey.pdf (accessed February 2014).Google Scholar
36. Al Sabbah, H, Vereecken, C, Kolsteren, P, et al. (2007) Food habits and physical activity patterns among Palestinian adolescents: findings from the national study of Palestinian schoolchildren (HBSC-WBG2004). Public Health Nutr 10, 739746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Bere, E, Brug, J & Klepp, K-I (2008) Why do boys eat less fruit and vegetables than girls? Public Health Nutr 11, 321325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38. Di Noia, J & Contento, IR (2010) Fruit and vegetable availability enables adolescent consumption that exceeds national average. Nutr Res 30, 396402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Hall, JN, Moore, S, Harper, SB, et al. (2009) Global variability in fruit and vegetable consumption. Am J Prev Med 36, 4029 e5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Granner, ML, Sargent, RG, Calderon, KS, et al. (2004) Factors of fruit and vegetable intake by race, gender, and age among young adolescents. J Nutr Educ Behav 36, 173180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Koui, E & Jago, R (2008) Associations between self-reported fruit and vegetable consumption and home availability of fruit and vegetables among Greek primary-school children. Public Health Nutr 11, 11421148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42. Charlton, K, Kowal, P, Soriano, MM, et al. (2014) Fruit and vegetable intake and body mass index in a large sample of middle-aged australian men and women. Nutrients 6, 23052319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Hart, CN, Jelalian, E, Raynor, HA, et al. (2010) Early patterns of food intake in an adolescent weight loss trial as predictors of BMI change. Eating Behav 11, 217222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Field, AE, Gillman, MW, Rosner, B, et al. (2003) Association between fruit and vegetable intake and change in body mass index among a large sample of children and adolescents in the United States. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 27, 821826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45. Neumark-Sztainer, D, Wall, M, Perry, C, et al. (2003) Correlates of fruit and vegetable intake among adolescents: findings from project EAT. Prev Med 37, 198208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. Granner, ML & Evans, AE (2012) Measurement properties of psychosocial and environmental measures associated with fruit and vegetable intake among middle school adolescents. J Nutr Educ Behav 44, 211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Nago, ES, Verstraeten, R, Lachat, CK, et al. (2011) Food safety is a key determinant of fruit and vegetable consumption in urban beninese adolescents. J Nutr Educ Behav 44, 548555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. Ammerman, AS, Lindquist, CH, Lohr, KN, et al. (2002) The efficacy of behavioral interventions to modify dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake: a review of the evidence. Prev Med 35, 2541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
49. Knai, C, Pomerleau, J, Lock, K, et al. (2006) Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: a systematic review. Prev Med 42, 8595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50. World Health Organization (2013) Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs 2013–2020. http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-action-plan/en/ Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Global School-based Student Health Survey year of data collection, initial and valid sample sizes of eleven Eastern Mediterranean Region countries (Numbers and percentages)

Figure 1

Table 2 Characteristics of the study sample before and after exclusion* (Numbers and percentages)

Figure 2

Table 3 Gross national income (GNI), population and per capita availability of fruits and vegetables (F&V) and prevalence of consuming F&V ≥5 times/d in eleven Eastern Mediterranean Region countries based on Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) year of data collection

Figure 3

Table 4 Differences in prevalence of adolescents’ consumption of fruits and vegetables among eleven Eastern Mediterranean Region countries†

Figure 4

Table 5 Within-country differences in proportions of fruit and vegetable consumption by age, sex and BMI