Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:37:58.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of the efficiency of proteins contained in lucerne hay and soya-bean meal for sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

H. Tagari
H. Tagari
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Hebrew University, Rehovot, Israel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. In four feeding experiments with sheep the utilization of proteins contained in lucerne hay and of those in toasted soya-bean meal (SBM), representing a roughage and concentrate feed respectively, were examined. The ration of one group of animals contained lucerne hay as sole source of digestible protein and that of the other SBM.

2. Measurements of the nitrogen balance showed clearly the superiority of lucerne hay as protein source compared with soya-bean meal; this arose from the greater N retention found with the lucerne hay ration.

3. The influence of both rations on the metabolic pathways of the proteins was examined by following the changes of concentration of various metabolites in the rumen contents and of blood urea at different intervals after feeding.

4. Concentrations of urea found in the blood of the sheep given lucerne hay were lower than those of the other group, a finding which is in agreement with the results of the balance experiments.

5. The concentrations of NH2-N and of aminoacids in the rumen liquor were higher in sheep given lucerne hay than in those given SBM. These concentrations appeared to be related to the differences between the soluble non-protein N contents of the two feeds.

6. The results agree with the finding from in vitro experiments that rumen liquor from sheep receiving lucerne hay promoted greater synthesis of protein than rumen liquor from sheep receiving SBM.

7. Total bacterial activity as measured by the reduction of triphenyltetrazolium chloride (dehydrogenase activity) was much higher in the rumen liquor of sheep given lucerne hay than when SBM was given.

8. The concentrations of volatile fatty acids (C2-C6) were much higher in the rumen liquor in sheep on the lucerne hay diet than in those on the SBM diet. After meals of the lucerne hay diet, the concentrations of acids higher than C2, particularly those of valeric acid, exceeded those present in the rumen liquor of the animals kept on the SBM diet.

9. Proline and alanine appeared in relatively higher concentrations in the rumen liquor than the other amino acids determined, and these two acids together with valine disappeared very rapidly. The possible conversion of these amino acids into valeric acid is considered. It is suggested that valeric acid found in relatively high concentrations in rumen liquor of sheep given lucerne hay may be due in part to the deamination of proline, which likewise disappeared very rapidly together with alanine and valine.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , August 1969 , pp. 455 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1969

References

Abou Akkada, A. R. & el-Sayed Osman, H. (1967). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annison, E. F. (1956). Biochem. J. 64, 705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, O. G., Lehmkuhl, A., Johnson, R. R., Hershberger, T. V. & Moxon, A. L. (1954). J. Am. chem. Soc. 76, 5000.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1967). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants, 2nd ed. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Block, R. I. & Weiss, K. W. (1956). Amino Acid Handbook, pp. 306, 320. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Bondi, A. & Neumark, H. (1960). Agriculture Yearbook, p. 249. (In Hebrew.)Tel-Aviv: Hassadeh Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
Bryant, M. P. & Doetsch, R. N. (1955). J. Dairy Sci. 38, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, M. P., Small, N., Bouma, C. & Chu, H. (1958). J. Bact. 76, 15.Google Scholar
Chalmers, M. I., Jayasinghe, T. B. & Marshall, B. M. (1964). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 63, 283.Google Scholar
Chalmers, M. I. & Synge, R. L. M. (1954). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 44, 263.Google Scholar
Clarke, E. M. W., Ellinger, G. M. & Phillipson, A. T. (1966). Proc. R. Soc. B 166, 69.Google Scholar
Conway, E. J. (1957). Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error, 4th ed. London: Crosby Lockwood & Son.Google Scholar
Dehority, B. A., Bentley, O.G., Johnson, R. R. & Moxon, A. L. (1957). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 502.Google Scholar
Dehority, B. A., Johnson, R. R., Bentley, O. G. & Moxon, A. L. (1958). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 78, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehority, B. A., el-Shazly, K. & Johnson, R. R. (1960). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 1098.Google Scholar
El-Shazly, K. (1952). Biochem. J. 51, 640, 647.Google Scholar
Erwin, E. S., Marco, G. J. & Emery, E. M. (1961). J. Dairy Sci. 44, 1768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontenot, J. P., Gallup, W. D. & Nelson, A. B. (1955). J. Anim. Sci. 14, 807.Google Scholar
Forbes, R. M. & Garrigus, W. P. (1949). J. agric. Res. 78, 483.Google Scholar
Gilroy, J. R. (1958) Nitrogen requirement for growth of bovine rumen bacteria. PhD Thesis, Maryland University, USA.Google Scholar
Guggolz, I., Herring, V. V. & Kohler, G. O. (1967). J. agric. Fd Chem. 15, 1052.Google Scholar
Henderickx, H. & Martin, J. (1963). In vitro Study of the Nitrogen Metabolism in the Rumen. Gent: State Agriculture College, Department of Animal Nutrition and Animal Husbandry.Google Scholar
Houpt, T. R. (1959). Am. J. Physiol. 197, 115.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. R., Dehority, B. A., Bentley, O. G. & Moxon, A. L. (1957). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 16, 202.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1957). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48, 438.Google Scholar
McDonald, I. W. (1948). Biochem. J. 42, 584.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (1943). J. Anim. Sci. 2, 263.Google Scholar
Moir, R. J. & Somers, M. (1957). Aust. J. agric. Res. 8, 253.Google Scholar
Packett, L. V. & McCune, R. W. (1965). Appl. Microbiol. 13, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherrod, L. B. & Tillman, A. D. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 901.Google Scholar
Stickland, L. H. (1934). Biochem. J. 28, 1746.Google Scholar
Tagari, H., Ascarelli, I. & Bondi, A. (1962). Br. J. Nutr. 16, 237.Google Scholar
Tagari, H., Dror, Y., Ascarelli, I. & Bondi, A. (1964). Br. J. Nutr. 18, 333.Google Scholar
Tagari, H., Krol, O. & Bondi, A. (1965). Nature, Lond. 206, 37.Google Scholar