Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T00:37:36.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Circadian variation in abomasal digesta flow in grazing ewes during lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

H. Dove ,
J. A. Milne ,
A. M. Sibbald ,
C. S. Lamb  and
H. A. McCormack
H. Dove
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
J. A. Milne
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
A. M. Sibbald
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
C. S. Lamb
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
H. A. McCormack
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Lactating grazing ewes, fistulated at the rumen and abomasum were either not supplemented or offered, individually, 600 g/d of either pelleted, molassed sugar-beet pulp (‘energy’ supplement) or a pelleted 1:1 (w/w) mixture of this feed and formaldehyde-treated soya-bean meal (‘protein’ supplement). Digesta flows at the abomasum were estimated from the concentrations of the markers CrEDTA and ruthenium phenanthroline complex, during their administration by continuous intra-rumen infusion. Digesta samples were taken at 09.00 hours and at six further times at 4 h intervals. This was repeated 2 d later.

2. No significant difference in flow between days was noted. Daily flows of dry matter (DM) and non-ammonia-nitrogen (NAN) (g/d) in supplemented ewes were significantly higher than in unsupplemented ewes, both in total digesta and its particulate phase. However, there were significant differences between sampling times or significant interactions between sampling time and supplement treatment. The results were therefore examined by Fourier analysis for possible circadian variation in digesta flow. As there was marked between-animal variability in flow-rate, the digesta-flow values for each sampling time were re-expressed as percentages of the flows calculated from daily mean marker concentrations.

3. In unsupplemented animals, marked and significant circadian variation was then identified in the flow of DM, total N and NAN in both whole digesta and the particulate phase. There was also significant circadian variation in the flow of DM, total N and NAN in the digesta of the supplemented ewes. Curves were of the same general shape as those for unsupplemented animals, but some significant differences were found, principally for digesta NAN flow. In both supplemented and unsupplemented animals, peak flows occurred in the period 20.00-01.00 hours. The proportion of DM and NAN flowing in the particulate phase was relatively constant through the day for unsupplemented ewes, but significant circadian variation occurred for supplemented ewes.

4. The possible mechanisms generating the circadian variation in digesta flow, such as grazing behaviour and the rumen digestion of supplements, are discussed. Values are also presented to indicate the extent of the likely errors if digesta flows were estimated from samples which did not represent all stages of the circadian pattern.

Type
General Nutrition papers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , November 1988 , pp. 653 - 668
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1988

References

Alexander, R. H. & McGowan, M. (1966) Journal of the British Grassland Society 21, 140–147.Google Scholar
Binnerts, W. T., Van't Klooster, A. T. & Frens, A. M. (1968) Veterinary Record 82, 470.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Lynch, J. J., Nicol, G. R. & Beeston, J. W. U. (1976) Laboratory Practice 25, 458–462.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. L. & Pickering, F. S. (1983) Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 193–210.Google Scholar
Dove, H. (1984) Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 24, 484–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dove, H., Freer, M., Axelsen, A. & Downes, R. W. (1984 a) Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 15, 329–332.Google Scholar
Dove, H., Freer, M., Egan, A. R. & Doyle, P. T. (1984 b) Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 9, 166.Google Scholar
Dove, H., Milne, J. A., Lamb, C. S., McCormackH. A., H. A., & Spence, A. M. (1985) Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 44, 63A.Google Scholar
Evans, C. C., MacRae, J. C. & Wilson, S. (1977) Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975 a). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 277–291 [McDonald, I.W., Warner, A. C. I., editors]. Armidale: University of New England.Google Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1975 b) Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faichney, G. J. (1980) Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 313–318.Google Scholar
Freer, M. & Dove, H. (1984) Animal Food Science and Technology 11, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GENSTAT (1977) GENSTAT, A General Statistical Program. Oxford: Numerical Algorithms Group.Google Scholar
Harris, L. E. & Phillipson, A. T. (1962) Animal Production, 4, 97–116.Google Scholar
Holder, J. M. (1962) Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 4, 154–159.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P. (1965) Nature 207, 666–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J. J. & Hedges, D. A. (1979) Applied Animal Ethology 5, 321–331.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., Maxwell, T. J. & Souter, W. (1981) Animal Production 32, 185–195.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Technical Bulletin, no. 33. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Rowell, J. G. & Walters, D. E. (1976) Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 423–432.Google Scholar
Tan, T. N., Weston, R. H. & Hogan, J. P. (1971) International Journal of Applied Radiation and Isotopes 22, 301–308.Google Scholar
Thomson, B. C., Cruickshank, G. J., Poppi, D. P. & Sykes, A. R. (1985) Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 45, 117–120.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963) Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, D. E. (1950) Nature 166, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanderley, R. C., Theurer, C. B., Rahnema, S. & Noon, T. H. (1985) Journal of Animal Science 61, 1550–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar