Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T03:32:12.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical composition of growth in nestling blackbirds and thrushes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2012

Lorette W. Bilby  and
Elsie M. Widdowson
Lorette W. Bilby
Affiliation:
Dunn Nutritional Laboratory, Infant Nutrition Research DivisionUniversity of Cambridge and Medical Research Council
Elsie M. Widdowson
Affiliation:
Dunn Nutritional Laboratory, Infant Nutrition Research DivisionUniversity of Cambridge and Medical Research Council
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The bodies of twenty-three nestling blackbirds and twenty-one nestling thrushes were analysed at different ages for water, fat, nitrogen, calcium, phosphorus, sodium, potassium and magnesium. These birds grow from a weight of 5 g at hatching to 70 and 50 g respectively when they leave the nest 12–13 d later.

2. The concentration of N in the bodies doubled, while Ca increased seven to eight times during this period, so that the total amount of Ca in the body increased by about 100 times.

3. The femurs of the newly hatched birds were very immature and contained little Ca or collagen but in the fledgelings the femurs were as well calcified as those of 17-d-old chicks.

4. The gastro-intestinal tracts of the birds contained large amounts of Ca. Their food consists of caterpillars, adult insects and earthworms, none of which have much Ca in their tissues but their gut contents may contain much Ca. It is suggested that it is the gut contents of these invertebrates that provide nestling birds with Ca.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , January 1971 , pp. 127 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1971

References

REFERENCES

Baker, L. C., Lampitt, L. H. & Brown, K. P. (1953). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 4, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilby, L. W. (1969). The utilization of calcium for bone formation in the growing animal before and after birth. PhD Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cawkell, E. M. (1950). Br. Birds 43, 297.Google Scholar
Chibnall, A. C., Rees, M. W. & Williams, E. F. (1943). Biochem. J. 37, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickerson, J. W. T. (1962 a). Biochem. J. 82, 47.Google Scholar
Dickerson, J. W. T. (1962 b). Biochem. J. 82, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, L. (1954). Ibis 96, 225.Google Scholar
King, E. J. (1932). Biochem. J. 26, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCance, R. A. & Shipp, H. L. (1933). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun. no. 187.Google Scholar
McCance, R. A., Widdowson, E. M. & Shackleton, L. R. B. (1936). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun. no. 213.Google Scholar
Neuman, R. E. & Logan, M. A. (1950). J. biol. Chem. 184, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. W. (1958). Ibis 100, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uvarov, B. P. (1928). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 76, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar