Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T00:49:46.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in the composition of digesta during passage through the small intestines of steers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. B. McAllan
A. B. McAllan
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading RG2 9AT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), nitrogenous constituents, carbohydrate constituents and pH were estimated in digesta taken from eight different sites in the small intestines of slaughtered steers given different diets. Amounts of constituents passing different sites were compared using cellulose as a non-digestibte marker.

2. Amounts of the different constituents entering the small intestines varied with the type of diet given but the patterns of removal of each constituent were similar regardless of diet.

3. DM and OM were removed uniformly down the length of the small intestines. Net digestibilities of 0·62 and 0·63 for DM and OM respectively of the amounts measured in segment 1 digesta (first 3 m post-pylorus) were found at the terminal ileum. DM and OM contents of segment 1 digesta were 5 and 8% higher respectively than in abomasal digesta. Significantly smaller amounts of digesta were found in the proximal quarter of the small intestines than in more distal sections. There was a 10% addition of water to digesta in segment 1 compared with abomasal digesta. Of the water entering the small intestines a net 65% was absorbed therein, most absorption occurring in the first half.

4. Ammonia nitrogen was removed uniformly down the length of the small intestines to a net extent of 75% of that in segment 1 digesta. There was an apparent increase of approximately 18% in the total N (TN) content of segment 1 digesta compared with abomasal digesta. There was an approximate net removal of 80% of the TN measured in segment 1 digesta during passage down the small intestines. Over 95% of the digestible TN was removed in the section of tract between 3 and 15 m from the pylorus. Net removal of nucleic acid N (NA–N) up to the distal ileum was 78% of that in segment 1 digesta, most removal occurred in the proximal quarter of the small intestine. Little or no net loss of diaminopimelic acid–N (DAP–N) occurred in the small intestine.

5. Of the carbohydrates entering the small intestines, there was little or no removal of rhamnose, arabinose or xylose. Net removal of ribose, mannose, galactose and ‘starch’ glucose up to the distal ileum was 82, 76, 54 and 70% respectively of the amounts found in segment 1 digesta. All disappeared uniformly down the length of the small intestine.

Type
General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , November 1981 , pp. 431 - 440
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1981

References

Armstrong, D. G. & Beever, D. E. (1969). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 28, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. & Hutton, K. (1975). In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I., editors). Armidale, NSW: The University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. & Smithard, R. R. (1979). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 38, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badawy, A. M., Campbell, R. M., Cuthbertson, D. P., Fell, B. F. & Mackie, W. S. (1958). Br. J. Nutr. 12, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Coehlo da Silva, J. F., Prescott, J. H. D. & Armstrong, D. G. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 28, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Ghedalia, D., Tagari, H., Bondi, A. & Tadmor, A. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 31, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, W. G. (1978). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 37, 1223.Google Scholar
Bertoni, G., Watson, M. J., Savage, G. P. & Armstrong, D. G. (1976). Zoo Nutr. Anim. 2, 107.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. D., Lardy, H. & Myrback, K. (1960). The Enzymes, vol. 4. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boyne, A. W., Campbell, R. M., Davidson, J. & Cuthbertson, D. P. (1956). Br. J. Nutr. 10, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J., Goodall, E. D., Kay, R. N. B., Phillipson, A. T. & Vowles, L. E. (1966). Proc. R. Soc. B 166, 46.Google Scholar
Bruce, L. A. & Huber, T. L. (1973). J. Anim. Sci. 37, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsden, S. R., Hitchcock, M. W. S., Marshall, R. A. & Phillipson, A. T. (1945–1946). J. exp. Biol. 22, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grovum, W. L. & Williams, V. J. (1973). Br. J. Nutr. 29, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, F. A. & Hill, K. J. (1962). J. Physiol., Lond. 162, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J. P. & Phillipson, A. T. (1960). Br. J. Nutr. 14, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. (1969). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 28, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. & Pfeffer, E. (1969). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (Phillipson, A. T., editor). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Oriel Press Limited.Google Scholar
Lee, G. J. (1977). Aust. J. agric. Res. 28, 1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, A. M. & Garton, G. A. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, A. M., Lough, A. K. & Garton, G. A. (1968). Br. J. Nutr. 22, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllan, A. B. (1980). Br. J. Nutr. 44, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllan, A. B. & Smith, R. H. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllan, A. B. & Smith, R. H. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 31, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllan, A. B. & Smith, R. H. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 37, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minor, S., MacLeod, N. A., Preston, T. R. & Leng, R. A. (1977). Trop. Anim. Prod. 2, 163.Google Scholar
Nickel, R., Schummer, A. & Seiferle, E. (1973). The Viscera of the Domestic Mammals. (Translated and revised by Sack, W. O.). Berlin-Hamburg: Verlag Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Reynaud, P. (1955). Arch. Sci. physiol. 9, 35.Google Scholar
Smith, R. H. (1979). J. Anim. Sci. 49, 1604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. H. & McAllan, A. B. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. H. & McAllan, A. B. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 25, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. H., McAllan, A. B., Hewitt, D. & Lewis, P. L. (1978). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 90, 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagari, H. & Bergmann, E. N. (1978). J. Nutr. 108, 790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar