Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:42:21.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calcium and phosphorus requirements of the ewe during pregnancy and lactation

2. Phosphorus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

G. D. Braithwaite
G. D. Braithwaite
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, BerkshireRG2 9AT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Mineral balance and radioisotope studies have been carried out to test the adequacyof the recent Agricultural Research Council (1980) recommendations for calcium and phosphorus for pregnant and lactating ewes. At the same time, P metabolism was compared throughout pregnancy and lactation in ewes fed according to these recommendations and in ewes fed a plentiful supply of dietary Ca and P.

2. Bone mineral stores were mobilized in late pregnancy and early lactation, irrespective of the rate of P absorption. These stores were then replaced in mid- to late lactation in ewes given the plentiful Ca and P intake but not in the ewes given the restricted intake.

3. Results suggest that these changes in bone stores occurred as a result of changes in Ca requirements rather than in P requirements, and that accretion of P into bone or resorption of P from bone occurred merely as a conseqence of this change in Ca requirements.Immediate demands for P for maintenance and fetal or milk production do not reflect net Pdemands, which also take into account changes in bone P metabolism.

4. The rate of P absorption was directly related to net demands and the rate of endogenous excretion was inversely related to net demands.

5. Absorption and endogenous faecal loss of P were also both directly related to P intake.

6. A lack of dietary Ca, particularly in mid- to late lactation, makes it impossible to draw conclusions on the adequacy of the Agricultural Research Council (1980) recommendations for P. Results do suggest, however, that P requirements ought to be calculated according to net demands for P rather than immediate demands.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , November 1983 , pp. 723 - 736
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, No. 2, Ruminants. London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Aubert, J.-P. & Milhaud, C. (1960). Biochemica et Biophysica Acta 39, 122–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D. (1975). British Journal of Nutrition 34, 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D. (1978). British Journal of Nutrition 40, 387–392.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D. (1980). British Journal of Nutrition 44, 183–191.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D. (1981). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 291–299.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D. (1983). British Journal of Nutrition 50, 711–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D. & Glascock, R. F. (1976). Biennial Reviews, National Institute for Research in Dairying, pp. 43–59.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D., Glascock, R. F. & Riazuddin, Sh. (1969). British Journal of Nutrition 23, 827–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, G. D. & Riazuddin, Sh. (1971). British Journal of Nutrition 26, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, B. (1982). Milling, Feed and Fertilizer 165 (9), 27–33.Google Scholar
Field, A. C., Sykes, A. R. & Gunn, R. G. (1974). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, C. H. & Subbarow, Y. (1925). Journal of Biological Chemistry 66, 375–400.Google Scholar
Grace, N. D. (1980). Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 40, 221–225.Google Scholar
Gueguen, L. (1982). XXXIII Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production,Leningrad, USSR.Google Scholar
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (1978). Alimentation des Ruminants. Versailles: INRA Publications.Google Scholar
Leuker, C. E. & Lofgreen, G. P. (1961). Journal of Nutrition 74, 233–238.Google Scholar
Manston, R. (1966). British Veterinary Journal 122, 443–449.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1968). Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals, No. 5, Nutrient Requirements of Sheep, Publication No. 1693. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1975). Nutrient Requirements of Sheep, 5th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Parsons, D. H. (1968). Mathematical Biosciences 2, 191–197.Google Scholar
Preston, R. L. & Pfander, W. H. (1964). Journal of Nutrition 83, 369–378.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. R. & Dingwall, R. A. (1976). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 587–594.Google Scholar
Technicon Instruments Corporation (1967) Technicon Methodology Sheet N-4B. Tarry Town, New York: Technicon Instruments Corporation.Google Scholar
Young, V. R., Lofgreen, G. P. & Luick, J. R. (1966 a). British Journal of Nutrition 20, 795–805.Google Scholar
Young, V. R., Richards, W. P. C., Lofgreen, G. P. & Luick, J. R. (1966 b). British Journal of Nutrition 20, 783–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar