Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:09:22.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Body fatness, relative weight and frame size in young adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Jos A. H. Baecke ,
Jan Burema  and
Paul Deurenberg
Jos A. H. Baecke
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, De Dreijen 12, 6703 BC Wageningen, The Netherlands
Jan Burema
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, De Dreijen 12, 6703 BC Wageningen, The Netherlands
Paul Deurenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, De Dreijen 12, 6703 BC Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Body-weight, body height, knee width, wrist width and skinfold measurements were made on males (n 139) and females (n 167) in three age-groups (20–22, 25–27 and 30–32 years). Percentage of body fal was calculated from skinfold thicknesses using regression equations according to Durnin & Womersley (1974), Three indices of relative weight were calculated: W/H2, W/Hp and W/Ŵ, where W is body-weight, H is body height, p is the exponent that made the index of relative weight independent of height and W is the weight, estimated from body height and frame size.

2. The standard error of the estimate of body-weight was only reduced by 5% in males and by 13% in females when, in addition to body height, knee width was taken into account.The addition of wrist width did not improve the accuracy of estimation of body-weight in either sex. Therefore in further analyses W was estimated from body height and knee width. In the present population the exponent p was 1·7 in males and 1·6 in females.

3. The correlations between the percentage of body fat and the indices, W/H2, W/HP, and W/Ŵ, were all very similar, being approximately 0·8 in both sexes.

4. A positive relationship was observed between percentage of body fat and knee width in females, which may be explained by an artifact of measurement.

5. In conclusion it can be stated that the accuracy of estimation of percentage of body fat was not improved when the index of relative weight was adjusted for knee width or wrist width in the present population. The W/H2was the most preferable of the three indices which were calculated.

Type
Papers of direct reference to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , July 1982 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1982

References

REFERENCES

Baecke, J. A. H., Burema, J., Wiel-Wetzels, W. A. M. van der (1981). Prevalentie van overgewicht bij jonge volwassenen in Ede. Wageningen: Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Benn, R. T. (1971). Br. J. Prev. Soc. Med. 25, 42.Google Scholar
Billewicz, W. Z., Kemsley, W. F. F. & Thomson, A. M. (1962). Br. J. prev. soc. Med. 16, 183.Google Scholar
Brozek, J. (1956). Science, N. Y. 124, 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Rahaman, M. M. (1967). Br. J. Nutr. 21, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Womersley, J. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 32, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florey, C. du V. (1970). J. Chron. Dis. 23, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldbourt, U. & Medalie, J. H. (1974). Br. J. prev. soc. Med. 28, 116.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. A., Weiner, J. S., Tanner, J. M. & Barnicot, N. A. (1977). Human Biology, 2nd ed. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. S. & Pollock, M. L. (1976). Med. Science Sports 8, 196.Google Scholar
Keys, A.,Aravanis, C., Blackburn, H. W., Buchem, F. S. P.vanBuzina, R., Djordjević, B. S., Dontas, A. S., Fidanza, F., Karvonen, M. J., Kimura, N., Lekos, D., Monti, M., Puddu, V. & Taylor, H. L. (1967). Acta Med. Scand. Suppl. 460, 289.Google Scholar
Keys, A., Fidanza, F., Karvonen, M. J., Kimura, N. & Taylor, H. L. (1972). J. Chron. Dis. 25, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khosla, T. & Lowe, C. R. (1967). Br. J. prev. soc. Med. 21, 122.Google Scholar
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (1959). Stat. Bull. 40, 1.Google Scholar
Passmore, R. & Robson, J. S. (1973). A Companion to Medical Studies, vol. 1, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Seltzer, C. C., Stoudt, H. W. Jr., Bell, B. & Mayer, J. (1970), Am. J. Epidemiol. 92, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, P. E.Watson, I. D. & Batt, R. D. (1979). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 32, 736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, J. S. & Lourie, J. A. (1969). Human Biology. A Guide to Field Methods, 1st ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Wijn, J. F. de & Zaat, J. C. A. (1968). Voeding 29, 208.Google Scholar
Womersley, J. & Durnin, J. V. G. A. (1977). Br. J. Nutr. 38, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar