Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:24:15.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biological evaluation of crab meat (Scylla-Serrata)in the rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S. V. Gangal
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Science, Bombay 1, India
N. G. Magar
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Science, Bombay 1, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The meat of the Indian species of crab was assessed for the quality of its protein with the use of protein-depleted adult rats.

2. The crab meat and casein had the same biological value, 88.

3. Crab meat supported a higher growth rate than casein in rats.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1967

References

Anonymous (1952). Rep. Pa agric. Exp. Stn p. 36.Google Scholar
Chick, H. M. & Roscoe, M. H. (1930). Biochem. J. 24, 1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangal, S. V. & Magar, N. G. (1962). Indian J. appl. Chem. 25, 133.Google Scholar
Hegsted, D. M., Mills, R. C., Elvehjem, C. A. & Hart, E. B. (1941). J. biol. Chem. 138, 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanham, W. B., Lee, C. F. & Nilson, H. W. (1940). Fishery Market News Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S. 2, 26.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H. (19231924). J. biol. Chem. 58, 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, T. B., Mendel, L. B. & Ferry, E. I. (1919). J. biol. Chem. 37, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, W. C., Smith, L. C., Womack, M. & Shane, M. (1949). J. biol. Chem. 181, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, M. O. (1950). J. Nutr. 41, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sure, B. & Easterling, L. (1952). J. Nutr. 48, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, U., Okuda, V., Okimato, T. & Nagasawa, T. (1919). J. Tokyo chem. Soc. 40, 385.Google Scholar
Watson, U. K. & Fellers, C. R., (1935). Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 65, 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar