Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T04:47:50.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Biochemical characteristics of different forms of protein-energy malnutrition: an experimental model using young rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2007

C. R. C. Heard ,
Sylvia M. Frangi ,
Pauline M. Wright  and
P. R. McCartney
C. R. C. Heard
Affiliation:
Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism Unit, Department of Human Nutrition
Sylvia M. Frangi
Affiliation:
Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism Unit, Department of Human Nutrition
Pauline M. Wright
Affiliation:
Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism Unit, Department of Human Nutrition
P. R. McCartney
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. In three separate experiments, four groups of five to eight young male rats were fed either (i) a high-protein diet, for which the net dietary protein: total metabolizable energy ratio (NDp:E) was 0.1 (HP diet); or (ii) a low-protein diet, for which NDP:E was 0.04 (LP diet). In both these groups, food intake was ad lib In group (iii) the HP diet was given in an amount approximately equal to that taken by the LP group fed ad lib. (HP-restricted). In group (iv) rats were fasted for 48 h after receiving the HP diet (HP-fasted). Each experiment lasted 4 weeks.

2. In the LP and HP-restricted groups, food intake was about 50% of that of the HP rats, while body-weight, after 4 weeks on diet was about 35% and 55% of that of HP rats, for LP and HP-restricted respectively. Both groups of malnourished rats gained some weight during the experiment.

3. Measurements of oral glucose tolerance and plasma insulin levels were made in the fourth week. LP and HP-restricted rats both showed low fasting insulin levels and low insulin to glucose ratios during the glucose tolerance tests; the LP rats were more seriously affected.

4. At the end of the fourth week the rats were killed and blood, liver and gastrocnemius muscle were analysed. LP rats showed specifically and consistently low values for haemoglobin and plasma protein concentration, and low activities of hepatic glucose-6-phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.9) and of alanine aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.2) in liver and muscle. The activity of hepatic aspartate aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.1) was, if anything, increased. The plasma amino acid concentrations and ratios showed a specific fall in branched-chain amino acids. Liver fat concentration was consistently elevated. The HP-restricted rats had normal values for haemoglobin, plasma protein and liver fat, and near-normal values for plasma amino acids. Hepatic alanine aminotransferase showed increased activity compared with HP rats, but muscle alanine aminotransferase showed reduced activity. The HP-fasted rats had increased haemoglobin, plasma protein and liver fat concentration, and very low liver glycogen concentrations. Hepatic alanine aminotransferase activity was elevated. Plasma alanine concentration was specifically reduced.

5. The results are consistent with suppression of gluconeogenesis, liver dysfunction and essential amino acid deprivation in LP rats. These biochemical changes found in rats on a low intake of a diet of low protein and high carbohydrate value are similar to those found in kwashiorkor. An equally low intake of a diet of good protein value (HP-restricted) led to marginally better growth, accompanied by biochemical signs of increased gluconeogenesis, analogous to those reported for nutritional marasmus. This nutritional state was not biochemically identical with that of acute fasting.

6. The results are discussed in terms of the consistency of the rat model, and its contribution to understanding biochemical changes found in infant malnutrition.

Type
Papers of direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , January 1977 , pp. 1 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1977

References

REFERENCES

Alleyne, G. A. O. & Scullard, G. H. (1969). Clin. Sci. 37, 631.Google Scholar
Asato, L., Heard, C. R. C. & Sketcher, R. D. (1974). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 33, 114A.Google Scholar
Ashmore, J. & Weber, G. (1968). In Carbohydrate Metabolism and its Disorders, Vol. 1, p. 336 [Dickens, F., Randle, P. J., Whelan, W. J., editors]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Becker, D. J., Pimstone, B. L., Hansen, J. D. L. & Hendricks, S. (1971). Diabetes 20, 542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, D. J., Pimstone, B. L., Hansen, J. D. L., MacHutchon, B. & Drysdale, A. (1972). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 25, 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, P. G. & Heard, C. R. C. (1973). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 32, 48A.Google Scholar
Coward, D. G. & Whitehead, R. G. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 28, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamant, Y. Z. & Shafrir, E. (1972). Biochim. biophys. Acta 279, 424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, T. K. & Waterlow, J. C. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 32, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doell, B. H. (1966). Protein-calorie deficiency and stress. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Durbin, P. A. J., Heard, C. R. C. & Platt, B. S. (1960). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 19, xxxv.Google Scholar
Felig, P., Owen, O. E., Wahren, J. & Cahill, G. F. Jr. (1969). J. clin. Invest. 48, 584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedland, R. A. & Harper, A. E. (1958). J. biol. Chem. 233, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalan, C. (1968). In Calorie Deficiencies and Protein Deficiencies, p. 49 [McCance, R. A., Widdowson, E. M., editors]. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Hales, C. N. & Randle, P. J. (1963). Biochem. J. 88, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heard, C. R. C. (1966). Diabetes 15, 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heard, C. R. C., Frangi, S. M. & Wright, P. M. (1973). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 32, 47A.Google Scholar
Heard, C. R. C. & Henry, P. A. J. (1969). J. Endocr. 45, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heard, C. R. C. & Turner, M. R. (1967). Diabetes 16, 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, L. E., Snyderman, S. E., Norton, P. M., Roitman, E. & Finch, J. (1963). Lancet ii, 1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, A. & Kits, van, Heijningen, A. J. M. (1954). Biochem. J. 56, 646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, K. L. & Nath, R. L. (1957). Bull. Calcutta Sch. trop. Med. Hyg. 5, 170.Google Scholar
Payne, P. R. & Stewart, R. J. C. (1972). Lab. Anim. 6, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, B. S. (1968). In Calorie Deficiencies and Protein Deficiencies, p. 240 [McCance, R. A., Widdowson, E. M., editors]. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Reitman, S. & Frankel, S. (1957). Am. J. clin. Path. 28, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stead, R. H. & Brock, J. F. (1972). J. Nutr. 102, 1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. G. (1968). In Carbohydrate Metabolism and its Disorders, Vol. 1, p. 465 [Dickens, F., Randle, P. J., Whelan, W. J., editors]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Waterlow, J. C. & Alleyne, G. A. O. (1971). Adv. Protein. Chem. 25, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterlow, J. C. & Weisz, T. (1956). J. clin. Invest. 35, 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinkove, C., Weinkove, E. A. & Pimstone, B. L. (1976). Clinical Science & Molecular Medicine 50, 153.Google Scholar
Whitehead, R. G. & Alleyne, G. A. O. (1972). Br. med. Bull. 28, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, R. G. & Dean, R. F. A. (1964). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 14, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodnott, D. P. (1961). J. Anim. Techns Ass. 12, 59.Google Scholar
Wootton, I. D. W. (1964). Micro-Analysis in Medical Biochemistry. 4th ed. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar