Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:03:38.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The availability of lysine in diets for pigs: comparative methodology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Jane Leibholz
Jane Leibholz
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Sydney, Camden, New South Wales 2570, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Four experiments were conducted to compare different methods for estimating the availability of lysine in protein feeds. The same feeds were used in all experiments. In the first experiment the apparent digestibility of lysine to the ileum of growing pigs was found to be 0.92, 0.69, 0.73, 0.85, 0.84 and 0.97 for soya-bean meal, cottonseed meal 1, cottonseed meal 2, meat meal, sunflower meal and skim milk respectively. In the second experiment the utilization of lysine (relative to free lysine) for weight gain, as measured in weaner pigs, was found to be 0.68, 0.73, 0.81, 0.86 and 1.00 for cottonseed meal 1, cottonseed meal 2, meat meal, sunflower meal and skim milk respectively. In Expt 3 diets were formulated to contain soya-bean meal, sunflower meal or cottonseed meal 2 with the same available lysine content from the measurements made in Expts 1 and 2. The feed conversion ratios of weaner pigs given these diets were similar for the three sources of protein when the values were adjusted for the differences in digestible dry matter intake. In the fourth experiment isoenergetic and isonitrogenous diets were formulated with increasing amounts of lysine from synthetic lysine or cottonseed meal 2. The diets were given to weaner pigs and resulted in a curvilinear response to lysine particularly for the cottonseed meal, so that the availability of lysine in cottonseed meal was similar to that of synthetic lysine at low lysine intakes and much lower than synthetic lysine at higher lysine intakes. Possible reasons for the curvilinear responses are discussed.

Keywords

LysineAvailabilityPigs
Type
Amino Acid Metabolism
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , May 1992 , pp. 401 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1992

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1981). The Nutrient Requirements of Pigs. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Alimon, A. R. & Farrell, D. J. (1980) Studies in pigs prepared with re-entrant cannulas. II. Disappearance of dry matter, nitrogen and amino acids from diets containing different protein sources. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 627–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batterham, E. S. (1987). Availability of lysine for grower pigs. Proceedings 1st Conference of the Australasian Pig Science Association, pp. 121–123. Werribee, Australia: Pig Science Association.Google Scholar
Batterham, E. S., Lowe, R. F., Darnell, R. E. & Major, E. J. (1986) Availability of lysine in meat meal, meat and bone meal and blood meal as determined by the slope-ratio assay with growing pigs, rats and chicks and by chemical techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 427–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterham, E. S., Murison, R. D. & Andersen, L. M. (1984) Availability of lysine in vegetable protein concentrates as determined by the slope-ratio assay with growing pigs and rats and by chemical techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 51, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batterham, E. S., Murison, R. D. & Lewis, C. E. (1979) Availability of lysine in protein concentrates as determined by the slope-ratio assay with growing pigs and rats and by chemical techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 41, 383–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggum, B. O. (1973). A study of certain factors influencing protein digestibility in rats and pigs. PhD Thesis, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, H., Sauer, W. C. & Thanker, P. A. (1984) Amino acid availabilities in soybean meal, sunflower meal, fish meal and meat and bone meal fed to growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 58, 926–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, M. & Stuart, A. (1977) The Advanced Theory of Statistics Vol. 1. New York: Charles Griffin & Co.Google Scholar
Leibholz, J. (1986). The utilization of lysine by young pigs from nine protein concentrates compared with free lysine in young pigs fed ad lib. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 179–186.Google ScholarPubMed
Leibholz, J. & Mollah, Y. (1988) Digestibility of threonine from protein concentrates for growing pigs. II. The digestibility of threonine to the terminal ileum in pigs given six protein concentrates. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 39, 721–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, W. C. & Ozimek, L. (1986) Digestibility of amino acids in swine: results and their practical applications. A Review. Livestock Production Science 15, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. & Torrie, J. H. (1980) Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Tanksley, T. D. Jr & Knabe, D. A. (1984). Ileal digestibility of amino acids in pig feeds and their use in formulating diets. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, pp. 75–95 [Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A., editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Tanksley, T. D. Jr, Knabe, D. A., Purser, K., Zebrowska, T. & Corley, J. R. (1981) Apparent digestibility of amino acids and nitrogen in three cottonseed meals and one soyabean meal. Journal of Animal Science 52, 769–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. H. & Leibholz, J. (1981) Digestion in the pig between 7 and 35 d of age. 5. The incorporation of amino acids absorbed in the small intestines into the empty-body gain of pigs given milk or soya-bean proteins. British Journal of Nutrition 45, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed