Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T00:23:46.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The assessment of the amount of fat in the human body from measurements of skinfold thickness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. V. G. A. Durnin  and
M. M. Rahaman
J. V. G. A. Durnin
Affiliation:
Institute of Physiology, The University, Glasgow, W 2
M. M. Rahaman
Affiliation:
Institute of Physiology, The University, Glasgow, W 2
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Skinfold thickness and body density were measured on 105 young adult men and women and 86 adolescent boys and girls.

2. The correlation coefficients between the skinfold thicknesses, either single or multiple, and density were in the region of −0.80.

3. Regression equations were calculated to predict body fat from skinfolds with an error of about ±3.5%.

4. A table gives the percentage of the body-weight as fat from the measurement of skin-fold thickness.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 1967 , pp. 681 - 689
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1967

References

Behnke, A. R., Feen, B. G. & Welham, W. C. (1942). J. Am. med. Ass. 118, 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brožek, J., Grande, F., Anderson, J. T. & Keys, A. (1963). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 110, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brožek, J. & Keys, A. (1951). Br. J. Nutr. 5, 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damon, A. & Goldman, R. F. (1964). Hum. Biol. 36, 32.Google Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Taylor, A. (1960). J. appl. Physiol. 15, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D. A. W., Hammond, W. H., Healy, M. J. R., Tanner, J. M. & Whitehouse, R. H. (1955). Br. J. Nutr. 9, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, R. F. (1962). Clin. Sci. 22, 333.Google Scholar
Hunt, E. E. J. & Heald, F. P. (1963). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 110, 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matiegka, J. (1921). Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 4, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, L. P. (1963). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 110, 545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pařízková, J. (1961 a). Metabolism 10, 794.Google Scholar
Pařízková, J. (1961 b). J. appl. Physiol. 16, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascale, L. R., Grossman, M. I., Sloane, H. S. & Frankel, T. (1956). Hum. Biol. 28, 165.Google Scholar
Rahn, H., Fenn, W. O. & Otis, A. B. (1949). J. appl. Physiol. 1, 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siri, W. E. (1956). In Advances in Biological and Medical Physics. [Lawrence, J. H. and Tobias, C. A. editors.] London and New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Steinkamp, R. C., Cohen, N. L., Gaffey, W. R., McKay, T., Bron, G., Siri, W. E., Sargent, T. W. & Isaacs, E. (1965). J. chron. Dis. 18, 1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, J. M. (1962). In Growth at Adolescence, 2nd ed., p. 241. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. M. & Whitehouse, R. H. (1962). Br. med. J. i, 446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vener, Y. A. (1933). In White House Conference on Child Health and Protection; Growth and Development of the Child. Part 2. Anatomy and Physiology, p. 92, New York: Century.Google Scholar
von Döbeln, W. (1956). Acta. physiol. scand. 37, suppl.126.Google Scholar
Young, C. M. & Blondin, J. (1962). J. Am. diet. Ass. 41, 452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar