Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:32:52.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Arginine in poultry nutrition

3*. Agent and target in amino acid interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

G. H. Smith  and
D. Lewis
G. H. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough
D. Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A series of trials has been conducted to investigate interactions between amino acids in the diet of the growing chick. 2. Diets were prepared in which the level of arginine was limiting. To these diets were added excess levels of lysine, histidine, isoleucine and leucine. Of these amino acids lysine was most effective in reducing the growth rate. Growth rate was restored by adding arginine. 3. The addition of excess quantities of lysine to a diet in which the level of tryptophan was limiting and the level of arginine adequate did not reduce growth rate. 4. These results confirm the existence of a specific interaction between arginine and lysine. The concept is discussed that such specific interactions between pairs or among small groups of amino acids might underly many of the phenomenons of amino acid imbalance.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 1966 , pp. 621 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1966

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. O. & Dobson, D. C. (1959). Poult. Sci. 38, 1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulanger, P. & Osteux, R. (1956). Biochim. biophys. Acta 21, 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efimochkina, E. F. (1959). Biokhimiya 24, 46.Google Scholar
Elvehjem, C. A. (1956). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 15, 965.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. & Shapiro, R. (1961). J. Nutr. 75, 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, H., Shapiro, R. & Griminger, P. (1960). J. Nutr. 72, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florentino, R. F. & Pearson, W. N. (1962). J. Nutr. 78, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, A. E. (1958). Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 69, 1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, A. E., Benton, D. A. & Elvehjem, C. A. (1955). Archs Biochem. Biophys. 57, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. D. (1962). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs. exp. Biol. 21, no. 2, p. 1.Google Scholar
Klain, G. J., Scott, H. M. & Johnson, B. C. (1958). Poult. Sci. 37, 976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klain, G. J., Scott, H. M. & Johnson, B. C. (1959). Poult. Sci. 38, 488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klain, G. J., Scott, H. M. & Johnson, B. C. (1960). Poult. Sci. 39, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. & Smith, G. H. (1963). Proc. int. Congr. Nutr. VI. Edidurgh, p. 479.Google Scholar
Lewis, D., Smith, G. H. & Payne, C. G. (1963). Br. J. Nutr. 17, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (1960). Publs natn. Res. Coun., Wash. no. 827.Google Scholar
O'Dell, B. L., Limbaugh, C. L. & Savage, J. E. (1962). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs. exp. Biol. 21, no. 2, p. 8.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. D. (1954). Arch Biochem. Biophys. 51, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snetsinger, D. C. & Scott, H. M. (1961). Poult. Sci. 40, 1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. G., Wortham, J. S., Benton, D. A. & Henderson, L. M. (1962). J. Nutr. 77, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar