Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:52:47.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Apparent amino acid absorption from feather meal by chicks*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Rachel Bielorai ,
Z. Harduf ,
B. Iosif  and
Eugenia Alumot
Rachel Bielorai
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Z. Harduf
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
B. Iosif
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Eugenia Alumot
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The apparent absorption values of individual amino acids from two samples of feather meal (FM) were determined in the lower ileum of chicks fed on diets containing magnesium ferrite as a marker.

2. The average absorption values for FM amino acids were low, approximately 0.50, as compared with approximately 0.85 for soya bean, used as a control. Values for individual amino acids from FM differed distinctly, ranging from 0.20 to 0.70. Low values were obtained for aspartic acid, histidine, lysine, glutamic acid and cystine.

3. An indication of the low absorption of the previously-mentioned amino acids was obtained by analysing the amino acid composition of the FM residues undigested by pepsin or pancreatin.

4. The reasons for testing the apparent rather than the true absorption are discussed.

Type
Paper on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , May 1983 , pp. 395 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1970). Official Methods of Analysis, 11th ed., p. 127. Washington DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.Google Scholar
Bielorai, R., Iosif, B., Neumark, H. & Alumot, E. (1982). J. Nutr. 112, 249.Google Scholar
Bielorai, R., Tamir, M. & Hurwitz, S. (1977). J. Nutr. 107, 1775.Google Scholar
Bragg, D. B., Ivy, C. A. & Stephenson, E. L. (1969). Poult. Sci. 48, 2135.Google Scholar
Burgos, A., Floyd, J. I. & Stephenson, E. L. (1974). Poult. Sci. 53, 198.Google Scholar
Hurwitz, S., Harrison, H. C. & Harrison, H. E. (1967). J. Nutr. 91, 319.Google Scholar
Matthews, D. M. (1975). Physiol. Rev. 55, 537.Google Scholar
Muztar, A. J. & Slinger, S. J. (1981). Poult. Sci. 60, 790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumark, H., Bielorai, R. & Iosif, B. (1982). J. Nutr. 112, 387.Google Scholar
Pieniazek, D., Rakowska, M., Szkilladziowa, W. & Grabarek, Z. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 34, 175.Google Scholar
Van Es, A. J. H. & Rerat, A. (1980). Proceedings of 3rd EAAP Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, publication no. 27, vol. 3, p. 32 [Oslage, H. J. and Rohr, K., editors]. Braun, West Germany; European Association of Animal Production.Google Scholar