Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:27:31.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anthropometric studies on African athletes who participated in the 1st African University Games

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

J. D. Watson  and
D. Y. Dako
J. D. Watson
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Ghana, PO Box 134, Legon, Ghana
D. Y. Dako
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Ghana, PO Box 134, Legon, Ghana
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Height, weight, skinfold thicknesses and mid-arm circumference were measured in 540 males and 117 females aged 20-24 years who took part in the 1st African University Games, held at the University of Ghana, Legon. Body fat content, Quetelet's index (weight ÷ height × 100; Khosla & Lowe (1967)) and mid-arm muscle circumference were derived from the measurements taken.

2. The physique or body-build of the subjects as assessed by Quetelet's index showed that both male and female subjects from the various countries were of medium body-build. The body fat content for males was between 10 and 12% with the exception of the Egyptians (12.8%) while that of females was between 23-24%.

3. Body measurements of the subjects compared favourably with that of international standards (WHO, 1966) with the exception of the triceps skinfold thickness which was only approximately 60% of the standard value.

4. The low values for triceps skinfold thickness are probably due to differences in the distribution of subcutaneous fat at different sites in the body as found between caucasian and non-caucasian population groups. The results are discussed in relation to the findings of other workers on ethnic differences in skinfold thickness.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , November 1977 , pp. 353 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1977

References

REFERENCES

Albrink, M. J. & Meigs, J. W. (1971). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 24, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnin, J. V. G. A. & Rahaman, M. M. (1967). Br. J. Nutr. 21, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eksmyr, R. S. & Engsner, G. (1971). J. trop. Paediat. envir. Child Hlth 17, 110.Google Scholar
Faulkner, F. (1960). Modern Problems in Pediatrics, p. 439. Basle and New York: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Garn, S. M., Rosen, N. N. & McCann, M. B. (1971). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 24, 1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, J. M. & Jellife, D. B. (1973). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 26, 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, W. H. (1955). Br. J. prev. Soc. Med. 22, 65.Google Scholar
Johnson, T. O. (1970). Trop. Geogr. Med. 22, 65.Google Scholar
Katzarski, M. & Ofosu-Amaah, S. (1973). Ghana med. J. 12, 287.Google Scholar
Khosla, T. & Lowe, C. R. (1967). Br. J. prev. Soc. Med. 21, 122.Google Scholar
Macmillan, M. G., Reid, C. M., Shirling, D. & Passmore, R. (1965). Lancet i, 728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malina, R. M. (1966). Human Biol. 38, 89.Google Scholar
Parry, E. H. O. (1969). E. Afr. med. J. 46, 246.Google Scholar
Piscopo, J. (1962). Res. Q. Am. Ass. Hlth Phys. Educ. Rec. 33, 255.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. C., Brucer, M. & Mass, J. (1940). J. Lab. clin. Med. 25, 807.Google Scholar
Robson, J. R. K. (1964). J. trop. med. Hyg. 67, 209.Google Scholar
Robson, J. R. K., Bazin, M. & Sonderstrom, R. (1971). Am. J. clin. Nutr. 24, 864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, R. S. & Etta, K. M. (1975). Br. J. Nutr. 33, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (1966). W.H.O. Monogr. ser. no. 53.Google Scholar