Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:46:32.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of total lysine as a predictor of lysine status in protein concentrates for growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

E. S. Batterham ,
R. D. Murison  and
C. E. Lewis
E. S. Batterham
Affiliation:
NSW Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
R. D. Murison
Affiliation:
NSW Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
C. E. Lewis
Affiliation:
NSW Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Centre, Wollongbar, New South Wales 2480, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Eight protein concentrates were compared on a total lysine basis in lysine-deficient diets for pigs during the 20–45 kg growth phase. Each diet was also supplemented with free lysine to verify that lysine was the first limiting amino acid.

2. With fish meal, skim-milk powder, rapeseed meal and soya-bean meal growth rates and feed conversion efficiencies were similar and superior (P < 0.05) to those produced with cottonseed meal, two meat meals and sunflower meal.

3. The response to added free lysine confirmed that lysine was the first limiting amino acid in all diets except skim milk, where the growth response was not significant (P < 0.05).

4. The growth response of the pigs indicated that the availability of lysine in cottonseed meal, the two meat meals and sunflower meal was reduced by approximately 60% compared to that in the other protein concentrates.

5. Rat bio-assay estimates of the availability of lysine in the protein concentrates were in general agreement with those calculated from the response of pigs. There was little relationship between the Silcock estimates for lysine availability for the cottonseed, meat meals or sunflower meal relative to either the rat bio-assay estimates or the response of pigs.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , July 1978 , pp. 23 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1978

References

Agricultural Research Council (1967). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock No. 3, Pigs. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Batterham, E. S. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 31, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batterham, E. S. & O'Neill, G. H. (1978). Br. J. Nutr. 39, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G., Myres, A. W., Newport, M. J. & Cuthbertson, A. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 27, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, K. J. (1960). Biochem. J. 77, 604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, K. J., McDonald, I. & Miller, W. S. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 27, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1964). Statistical Method in Biological Assay 2nd ed.New York: Hafner Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Husby, F. M. & Kroening, G. H. (1971). J. Anim. Sei. 33, 592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, C. K. & Westgarth, D. R. (1973). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 24, 873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, A. G., Sanderson, P. & Williams, D. R. (1967). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 18, 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taverner, M. R. & Rayner, C. J. (1975). Aust. J. exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 15, 626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar