Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:30:31.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The amino acid supplementation of barley for the growing pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2008

M. F. Fuller ,
I. Mennie  and
R. M. J Crofts
M. F. Fuller
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
I. Mennie
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
R. M. J Crofts
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Thirty-three diets were made by adding to ground barley combinations of L-lysine (0–6.0 g/kg) and L-threonine (0–3.0 g/kg), together with vitamins and minerals. Each was given to two female and two castrated male pigs during their growth from 25 to 60 kg.

2. Growth rate increased from 0.36 kg/d to a maximum of 0.65 kg/d with additions of 3.8 g L-lysine/kg and 1.8 g L-threonine/kg; these values and the maximum gains achieved were slightly higher for castrates than for females. Minimum values for food conversion ratio of 2.84 for castrates and 3.06 for females were achieved with similar amino acid additions to those giving fastest growth.

3. Carcass fat, estimated by specific gravity, was least with the addition of 5.9 g L-lysine/kg, but continued to decrease up to the highest threonine concentrations. Backfat thickness was also reduced by amino acid additions but failed to reach a minimum.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , March 1979 , pp. 333 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1979

References

Agricultural Research Council (1967). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock No, 3 Pigs. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Aw-Yong, L. M. & Beames, R. M. (1975). Can. J. Anim. Sci. 55, 765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, M. F., Livingstone, R. M., Baird, B. A. & Atkinson, T. (1979). Br. J. Nutr. 41, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, G. (1958). Tech. Commun. Commonw. Bur. Anim. Breed. Genet. no. 12, p. 5.Google Scholar
Meat and Livestock Commission (1971). Pig Carcass Classification. London: Meat and Livestock Commission.Google Scholar
Müller, Z., Kozel, V., Bauer, B., Štrunc, M. & Moravec, J. (1967). Biol. Chem. Vyzivy Zvirat 5, 399.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, H. R., Culik, R. & Eckert, R. E. (1959). J. Nutr. 69, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiemann, R. (1963). Sber. dt. Akad. LandWiss. 12, 50.Google Scholar