Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:00:19.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Absorption of methionine and methionine sulphoxide in rat intestine and the effect of glutathione

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

A. Aksnes  and
L. R. Njaa
A. Aksnes
Affiliation:
Institute of Nutrition, Directorate of Fisheries, N-5013 Bergen, Norway
L. R. Njaa
Affiliation:
Institute of Nutrition, Directorate of Fisheries, N-5013 Bergen, Norway
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The absorption of methionine and methionine sulphoxide was compared in inverted rings from three sections of rat intestine.

2. In all sections, absorption of unoxidized methionine was 20–40% higher than that of methionine at low physiological substrate concentrations. At higher substrate levels, the difference was not so pronounced.

3. Inhibition studies indicated that absorption of methionine and of methionine sulphoxide took place by different absorption systems.

4. Glutathione increased the absorption of methionine and, to a greater extent, the absorption of methionine sulphoxide.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , November 1983 , pp. 583 - 588
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1983

References

Anderson, G. H., shley, D. V. M. & Jones, J. D. (1976). Journal of Nutrition 106, 1108–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayling, P. D. (1981). Journal of Bacteriology 148, 514–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidot-Lopez, P. & Schinbeckler, B. (1981). Physiological Chemistry and Physics 13, 527–530.Google Scholar
Cheng, B., Navab, F., Lis, M. T., Miller, T. N. & Matthews, D. M. (1971). Clinical Science 40, 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuq, J.-L., Besancon, P., Chartier, L. & Cheftel, C. (1978). Food Chemistry 3, 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjøen, A. U. & Njaa, L. R. (1977). British Journal of Nutrition 37, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, O. W., Bridges, R. J. & Meister, A. (1978). National Academic Sciences, Proceedings 75, 5405–5408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higuchi, M., wami, K., Nakamura, A., saumoto, K. & Iwai, K. (1982). Agricultural and Biological Chemistry Journal 46, 2533–2538.Google Scholar
Kalra, V. K., Sikka, S. C. & Sethi, G. S. (1981). Journal of Biological Chemistry 256, 5567–5574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, J. (1973). Journal of Nutrition 103, 1519–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meister, A. (1982). Biochemical Society Transactions 10, 78–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meister, A. & Tate, S. S. (1976). Annual Review of Biochemistry 45, 559–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, B. G. (1981). In Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, pp. 1097–1122 [Johnson, L. R., editor]. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Njaa, L. R. & Aksnes, A. (1982). British Journal of Nutrition 48, 565–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richman, P. G., Orlowski, M. & Meister, A. (1973). Journal of Biological Chemistry 248, 6684–6690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar