Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:09:21.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scientific concepts in singing: Do they belong in a student toolbox of learning?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2011

Lotte Latukefu  and
Irina Verenikina
Lotte Latukefu*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Creative Arts, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, [email protected]
Irina Verenikina
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, [email protected]
*
Correspondence to Lotte Latukefu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents part of a five-year Australian study, the purpose of which was to look at learning singing in a pedagogical environment designed using sociocultural theory. The classroom environment was transformed over 5 years in consultation with other staff members and used the reflective journals that students wrote during that time as a way of refining and changing the design. Themes emerging from the journals were analysed to inform changes to the design. One of the main themes to emerge was student reflections about the scientific concepts they were taught and the ways the concepts were introduced. These reflections became the basis for the discussion in this paper. The study demonstrated that the students' acquisition of scientific concepts of singing affected both their singing performance and their ability to learn in a positive way. The study suggests that scientific concepts of singing could become part of the students' toolbox that helps develop their singing by making meaning of what they are experiencing kinaesthetically and aurally while they sing.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , July 2011 , pp. 181 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BAGNALL, A. & MCCULLOCH, K. (2005) Impact of specific exertion on the efficiency and ease of the voice: A pilot study. Journal of Voice, 19, 384–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BRAUN, V. & CLARKE, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CALLAGHAN, J. (1998) Singing teachers and voice science – An evaluation of voice teaching in Australian tertiary institutions. Research Studies in Music Education, 10, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHAPMAN, J. L. (2006) Singing and Teaching Singing. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.Google Scholar
CONABLE, B. (2000) The Structures and Movement of Breathing: A Primer for Choirs and Choruses. Chicago, IL: GIA Publications.Google Scholar
DANIELS, H. (2001) Vygotsky and Pedagogy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
DANIELS, H. (2007) Pedagogy. In Daniels, H., Cole, M. & Wertsch, J. V. (Eds), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky (pp. 307–331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DENSCOMBE, M. (2003) The Good Research Guide for Small-scale Research Projects (2nd Edn). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
DURRANT, C. & VARVARIGOU, M. (2008) Real time and virtual: tracking the professional development and reflections of choral conductors. Reflecting Education, 4 (1), 72–80.Google Scholar
ESTILL, J. (1996) Primer of Basic Figures (2nd Edn). Santa Rosa, CA: Estill Voice Training Systems.Google Scholar
GREGORC, A. (1982) An Adult's Guide To Style. Columbia, CT: Gregorc Associates.Google Scholar
HEDEGAARD, M. (2007) The development of children's conceptual relation. In Daniels, H., Cole, M. & Wertsch, J. V. (Eds), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky (pp. 246–275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KARPOV, Y. (2003) Vygotsky's doctrine of scientific concepts. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S. & Miller, S. M. (Eds), Vygotsky's Educational Theory in Cultural Context (pp. 65–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KARPOV, Y. (2005) The Neo-Vygotskian Approach to Child Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KAYES, G. (2004) Singing and the Actor (2nd Edn). London: A&C Black.Google Scholar
KENNY, D. & MITCHELL, H. (2006) Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of vocal gestures in the female classical voice. Journal of Voice, 20 (1), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LATUKEFU, L. (2007) The constructed voice: a sociocultural model of learning for undergraduate singers. Australian Voice, 13, 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LATUKEFU, L. (2009) Peer learning and reflection: strategies developed by vocal students in a transforming tertiary setting. International Journal of Music Education, 27 (2), 128–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARTON, F. (2007) Towards a pedagogical theory of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Monograph Series II, 4, 19–30.Google Scholar
MILLER, R. (1986) The Structure of Singing. System and Art in Vocal Technique. New York, NY: Schirmer Books.Google Scholar
MONTALVO, F. & TORRES, M. (2004) Self-regulated learning: current and future directions. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 2 (1), 1–34.Google Scholar
MÜRBE, D., SUNDBERG, J., IWARSSON, J., PABST, F. & HOFMANN, G. (1999) Longitudinal study of solo singer education effects on maximum SPL and level in the singers' formant range. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 24 (4), 178–186.Google Scholar
OATES, J., BAIN, B., DAVIS, P., CHAPMAN, J. & KENNY, D. (2006) Development of an auditory-perceptual rating instrument for the operatic singing voice. Journal of Voice, 20 (1), 71–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OBERT, K. & CHICUREL, S. (2005) Geography of the Voice: Anatomy of an Adam's Apple (2nd Edn). Santa Rosa, CA: Estill Voice Training Systems.Google Scholar
OTERO, V. (2006) Moving beyond the ‘get it or don't’ conception of formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 57 (3), 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REID, A. (2001) Variation in the ways that instrumental and vocal students experience learning music. Music Education Research, 3 (1), 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REID, C. L. (1975) Voice: Psyche and Soma. New York, NY: J. Patelson Music House.Google Scholar
SADLER, R. (2008) Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2, 159–179.Google Scholar
SHEWELL, C. (2009) Voice Work: Art and Science in Changing Voices. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SMITH, J. A. (1995) The search for meanings: semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In Smith, J. A., Harré, R. & Van Langenhove, L. (Eds), Rethinking Methods in Psychology (pp. 214–248). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TITZE, I. R. (1995) Voice research: speaking vowels versus singing vowels. Journal of Singing, 52 (1), 41.Google Scholar
VERDOLINI-MARSTON, K. & BALOTA, D. (1994). Role of elaborative and perceptual integrative processes in perceptual-motor performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20 (3), 739–749.Google ScholarPubMed
VERMUNT, J. (2007) The power of teaching-learning environments to influence student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Monograph Series II, Psychological Aspects of Education – Current Trends, 1, 72–89.Google Scholar
VYGOTSKY, L. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
VYGOTSKY, L. (1986) Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
VYGOTSKY, L. (1987) Problems of General Psychology. The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
WANG, F. & HANNAFIN, M. J. (2005) Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53 (4), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WATTS, C., BARNES-BURROUGHS, K., ETIS, J. & BLANTON, D. (2006) The singing power ratio as an objective measure of singing voice quality in untrained talented and nontalented singers. Journal of Voice, 20 (1), 82–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WERTSCH, J. V. (2007) Mediation. In Daniels, H., Cole, M. & Wertsch, J. V. (Eds), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
WESTERMAN GREGG, J. & SCHERER, R. (2006) Vowel intelligibility in classical singing. Journal of Voice, 20 (2), 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar