Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:56:27.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schema Theory and the Effect of Variable Practice in String Teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Fiona Pacey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Schmidt (1975) postulates that motor skills are learned as schemas, which should be better learned if built up from experiencing a wide variety of actions. This variable practice hypothesis is tested in teaching string pupils selected skills, namely the ability to control loudness, tempo and intonation. Results suggest a positive conclusion in the first two instances, but are more ambivalent in the third. There is some discussion of the implications for developing effective practising skills, to help learning become more productive and interesting, and in the application of such skills to the goal of musical and expressive performance.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , July 1993 , pp. 91 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bregman, A. S., Liao, C. & Levitan, R. (1990). Auditory Grouping Based on Fundamental Frequency and Formant Peak Frequency. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 44, 3, 400–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Carnahan, H. & Lee, T. D. (1989). Training for Transfer of a Movement Timing Skill. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 21, 1, 48–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel models in educational and social research. London:Griffin.Google Scholar
Gruson, L. M. (1988). Rehearsal skill and Musical Competence: Does Practice Make Perfect? In: Generative Processes in Music: The Psychology of Performance, Improvisation and Composition, [(Ed.) Sloboda, J. A.]. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, N., Garwood, J. & Palencia, M. (1987). Vocal Matching of Pitch Intervals: Learning and Transfer Effects. Psychology of Music, 15, 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, D. J. & Zelaznik, H. N. (1984). The Acquisition of Time Properties Associated with a Sequential Motor Skill. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 16, 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T. D., White, M. A. & Carnahan, H. (1990). On the Role of Knowledge of Results in Motor Learning: Exploring the Guidance Hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 22, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, S. M. (1983). Right from the Start. London:Boosey & Hawkes.Google Scholar
Pacey, F. M. (1992). Schema Theory and the Effect of Variable Practice in String Teaching. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Institute of Education, London University.Google Scholar
Palmer, C. & Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Mental Representations for Musical Meter. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 4, 728–741.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A Schema Theory of Discrete Motor Skill Learning. Psychological Review, 82, 4, 225–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. A. (1976). The Schema as a Solution to Some Persistent Problems in Motor Learning Theory. In: Motor Control: Issues and Trends. [(Ed.) Stelmach, G. E.]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J., Hansfield, S., Power, R. P. & Gorta, A. (1982). Ambiguous Musical Figures and Auditory Streaming. Perception and Psychophysics, 32, 454–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, S. (1969). Nurtured by Love: A New Approach to Education. New York: Exposition Press.Google Scholar
Welch, G. F. (1985). A Schema Theory of How Children Learn to Sing in Tune. Psychology of Music, 13, 1, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrisberg, C. A. & Ragsdale, M. R. (1979). Further Tests of Schmidt's Schema Theory: Development of a Schema Rule for a Coincident Timing Task. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 11, 2, 159–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wulf, G. & Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Variability in Practice: Facilitation in Retention and Transfer through Schema Formation or Context Effects? Journal of Motor Behaviour, 20, 2, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelaznik, H. N., Shaprio, D. C. & Newell, K. M. (1978). On the Structure of Motor Recognition Memory. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 10, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelaznik, H. N. & Spring, J. (1976). Feedback in Response Recognition and Production. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 8, 309–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed