Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:50:35.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Music technology tools and the implications of socio-cognitive research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Christopher Naughton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although there are many choices for teachers who are considering music technology in the classroom, care has to be taken not to be swayed by novelty value alone. What is required is software that can be linked directly to children's maturation as composers and instruments that make use of their existing playing skills. Sometimes it is difficult to make the right decision, as user friendliness can outweigh the educational value for the pupils. By looking at all that is available a more informed decision can be taken when purchases are made. This new dimension to music education offers an opportunity to reassess music learning and how thinking and working in groups can be developed in the music lesson.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , July 1997 , pp. 111 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashern, T.C. (1994). The Effect of Interface on the Structure of Interaction in Computer-mediated Small Group Discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11, 3, 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberger, J. (1991). The Mind Behind the Musical Ear. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Berz, W.L. & Bowman, J. (1992). An historical Perspective on Research Cycles in Music Computer-Based Technology. Bulletin: Council for Research in Music Education, 126, 15–27.Google Scholar
Brown, A. (1995). Digital Technology and the Study of Music. International Journal of Music Education, 25, 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eraut, M. (1995). Groupwork with computers in British Primary School. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 1, 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, D.J. (1990). The Developmental Psychology of Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kratus, J. (1989). A Time Analysis of the Compositional Processes Used by Children Ages 7–11. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 1, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. (1989). Effects of Training in Strategic Questioning on Children's Problem Solving Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 3.Google Scholar
Light, P., Sheldon, S., Woodhead, M. (eds) (1991). Learning to Think. London:Open University Press.Google Scholar
MacGregor, R.C. (1992a). Learning Theories and the Design of Music Compositional Software for the Young Learner. International Journal of Music Education, No. 20, pp. 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGregor, R.C. (1992b). Music Notational Software based on children's Own Symbolic Representations of Sound. Research Studies in Music Education, No.3, pp. 15–24.Google Scholar
MCMahon, O. (1992). Reinforcing Cognitive Skills Through Musical Experiences. International Journal of Music Education, No 19, pp. 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naughton, C. (1992). Current Usage. Music Teacher, 08 1992, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
Naughton, C. (1996). Thinking Skills in music Education. British Journal of Music Education, 13, 1, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repman, J. (1993). Collaborative, Computer-Based learning: Cognitive and Affective Outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9, 2, 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. London:Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Webb, B. (1995). Opinion: Educational Research and Computer Supported Co-Operative Learning. Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 2, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, J.H. (1994). Children's Strategies for Solving Compositional Problems with Peers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 3, 232–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willet, B.E. & Netusil, A.J. (1987). Music Computer Drill and Learning Styles at the Fourth-Grade Level. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 3, 220–229.Google Scholar