Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:08:54.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Multiple teachers: multiple gains?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

Elizabeth Haddon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the concept of instrumental/vocal learning when studying the same instrument or voice with more than one concurrent teacher. In this context, teachers may be working as a team, or one or both teachers may not know of the other's contribution to a student's learning. Qualitative data from music students and teachers at the University of York sheds some light on this often hidden learning context. This paper examines students’ reasons for studying with more than one teacher; their views on negotiating teacher demands; teacher–student–teacher dynamics; and assessment of the success of this context for learning. Teachers’ views are considered through discussion of their attitudes to this context, and their evaluation of its effect on their teaching. Findings suggest that although there may be problems for students regarding issues of teacher loyalty and dealing with conflicting advice, there are also many benefits including exposure to a greater range of musical and technical ideas and added pedagogical insight. There are also potential benefits for teachers if they are working as a team.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 28 , Issue 01: John Paynter: Music Educator 1931–2010 , March 2011 , pp. 69 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BOUD, D. (1988) Developing Student Autonomy in Learning. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, P. S. (1991) Lessons from the World. New York: Schirmer Books.Google Scholar
CROSS, N. (1999) Individualization of training programmes. In Cross, N. & Lyle, J. (Eds), The Coaching Process: Principles and Practice for Sport (pp. 174–191). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
CRYER, P. (2006) The Research Student's Guide to Success. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
DELAMONT, S., ATKINSON, P. & PARRY, O. (2004) Supervising the Doctorate. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
ELEY, A. & JENNINGS, R. (2005) Effective Postgraduate Supervision: Improving the Student/Supervisor Relationship. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
ELEY, A. & MURRAY, R. (2009) How to be an Effective Supervisor. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
GAUNT, H. (2006) Student and teacher perceptions of one-to-one instrumental and vocal tuition in a conservatoire. Unpublished PhD thesis, Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
GAUNT, H. (2008) One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: the perceptions of instrumental and vocal teachers. Psychology of Music, 36, 215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HALLAM, S. (1998) Instrumental Teaching: a Practical Guide to Better Teaching and Learning. Oxford: Heinemann Educational Publishers.Google Scholar
HIGGINS, M. C. & THOMAS, D. A. (2001) Constellations and careers: towards understanding the effects of multiple developmental relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JØRGENSEN, H. (2000) Student learning in higher instrumental education: who is responsible? British Journal of Music Education, 17, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KINGSBURY, H. (1988) Music, Talent and Performance: A Conservatory Cultural System. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
KRAM, K. (1985) Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
LEHMANN, A. C., SLOBODA, J. A. & WOODY, R. H. (2007) Psychology for Musicians: Understanding and Acquiring the Skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LYLE, J. (1999) The coaching process: an overview. In Cross, N. & Lyle, J. (Eds), The Coaching Process: Principles and Practice for Sport (pp. 3–24). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
MAILE, A. (1999) Applied physiology in sports coaching. In Cross, N. & Lyle, J. (Eds), The Coaching Process: Principles and Practice for Sport (pp. 91–112). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
MANTURZEWSKA, M. (1990) A biographical study of the life-span development of professional musicians. Psychology of Music, 18, 112–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MILES, S. A. & WATKINS, M. D. (2007) The leadership team: complementary strengths or conflicting agendas? Harvard Business Review, April, 90–98.Google Scholar
NEVIN, A. I., THOUSAND, J. S. & VILLA, R. A. (2009) Collaborative teaching for teacher educators – what does the research say? Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 569–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'TOOLE, J., GALBRAITH, J. & LAWLER, E. E. III (2002) When two heads are better than one: the promise and pitfalls of shared leadership. California Management Review, 44 (4), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PHILLIPS, E. M. & PUGH, D. S. (2006) How to get a PhD. 4th edition. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
PRESLAND, C. (2005) Conservatoire student and instrumental professor: the student perspective on a complex relationship. British Journal of Music Education, 22, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SOLOMON, G. B., STRIEGEL, D. A., ELIOT, J. F., HEON, S. N., MAAS, J. L. & WADYA, V. K. (1996) The self-fulfilling prophecy in college basketball: implications for effective coaching. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 8, 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TAYLOR, S. & BEASLEY, N. (2005) A Handbook for Doctoral Supervisors. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WISKER, G., EXLEY, K., ANTONIOU, M. & RIDLEY, P. (2008) Working One-to-one with Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
WYMAN, O. (2005) Designing Effective Co-leadership. Delta Organization & Leadership. www.oliverwyman.com/ow/pdf_files/Designing_Effective_Co-Leadership_WP.pdf (accessed 27/2/2010).Google Scholar