Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:37:13.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Economic Accountability of Music Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Extract

Music education struggles to survive in countries such as England, United States and South Africa because of the lack of financial support, particularly during economic recessions. To counter this unfortunate situation, well-written books and articles have been appeared over the years, propounding the truth that the arts do have an essential place in the balanced education of children, but these well-founded and constructed arguments continually fall on deaf ears. During economic recessions government planners and educational authorities rationalise that they can afford to do away with the arts because these subjects make little or no difference to the economic welfare of the country.

Information from the best-seller by Peters & Waterman, In Search of Excellence, reveals that the principle characteristics of the managers of excellent companies in the United States are characteristics that concern the creative process of thinking, creative aspects of personality, creative products and environmental conditions. These companies have a positive effect on the United States economy. As the aspect of education which is best equipped to nurture these characteristics is the arts, then it is reasonable to argue that we can not afford to ‘phase out’ music education.

Because education in the United States, England and South Africa is closely linked to the economy, music educators in capitalist countries should begin to argue for the arts from an economic standpoint, as capitalistic societies are orientated primarily toward capital gain. Failing this, we shall have to argue for more fundamental changes in political and economic systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brochu, L. (1975/1976) Priority to the essential. In Kraus, Egon (Ed.), International Music Education ISME Yearbook. Mainz: B. Schott's.Google Scholar
Choate, R. A. (Ed.) (1968) Documentary Report of the Tanglewood Symposium. Washington, D.C.: Music Educators National Conference.Google Scholar
Karel, L. C. (1978) Music education: strategies for survival. Music Educators Journal, 09, pp. 3035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark, M. L. (1982) Source Readings in Music Education. New York: Shirmer Books.Google Scholar
Paynter, J. (1982) Music in the Secondary School Curriculum: Trends and Developments in Class Music Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, T. J. & Waterman, R. H. Jr (1982) In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Regelski, T. A. (1973) Self-actualization in creating and responding to art. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 13, no. 4, 5768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, B. (organisation chairman) (1971) Report of an institute sponsored by CEMERAL. Towards an Aesthetic Education. Washington, D.C.: Music Educators National Conference.Google Scholar