Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:47:31.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing Musical Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Extract

The arts pose some particular problems in the field of assessment. In the study reported here, we examined some of the problems performance presents to assessors especially in the context of the GCSE examination, and with reference to the model for assessment given in the APU Report on Aesthetic Development.

A small-scale experiment was devised with the aim of investigating the reliability and different perceptions of judges of musical performances. As well as assessment by professional musicians, we investigated self assessment and assessment by peer-group members. There was a generally high measure of agreement between judges, both in terms of their individual comments and the rank order they each devised. This suggests that there were some objective criteria at work in their assessments. Self-assessments proved very realistic, although those of the peer-group were slightly less so.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References: General Assessment

Aspects of Secondary Education in England (1979) DES.Google Scholar
Assessment and Monitoring of Progress in Secondary Schools (1983) Welsh Office.Google Scholar
Broadfoot, Patricia (1979) Assessment, Schools and Society. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Cohen, Leslie (1977) Assessment by Teachers in Examinations at 16 + (Schools Council Examinations Bulletin no. 37). London: Evans/Methuen Educational.Google Scholar
Deale, R. N. (1975) Assessment and Testing in the Secondary School (Schools Council Examinations Bulletin no. 32). London: Evans/Methuen Educational.Google Scholar
Gibby, Bill (1978) Methods of Assessment in ‘Theory and Practice of Curriculum Studies’ by Lawton, Denis and others. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. G. (1974) Assessment in Education London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
MacIntosh, H. G. (Ed.) (1974) Techniques and Problems of Assessment. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Primary Education in England (1978) DES.Google Scholar
The Practical Curriculum (Working Paper 70) (1981) Schools Council.Google Scholar
Rowntree, Derek (1977) Assessing Students: How Shall We Know Them? London: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Satterly, David (1981) Assessment in Schools. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
SirWaddell, J. (1978) School Examinations. HMSO.Google Scholar

2. Arts Assessment

The Arts in Schools – Principles, Practice and Provision (1982) London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar
Aspin, David N. (1984) Objectivity and Assessment in the Arts: The Problem of Aesthetic Education. London: NAEA.Google Scholar
Aesthetic Development (1983) London: Assessment of Performance Unit, DES.Google Scholar
Britton, J. N., Martin, N. C., and Rosen, H. (1966) Multiple Marking of English Compositions (Schools Council Examinations Bulletin, No. 12).Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm (1978) The Creative Arts. London: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Michael (1983) Problems of Assessment and Examination in Art Education. Journal of Art and Design Education, vol. 2, no. 3 pp. 297317.Google Scholar

3. Music Assessment

Colwell, Richard (1970) The Evaluation of Music Teaching and Learning. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
GCSE The National Criteria – Music (1985) DES.Google Scholar
Music from 5 to 16 (1985) Curriculum Matters 4, DES.Google Scholar
Paynter, John (1982) Music in the Secondary School Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scottish Experimental Guidelines in Music (1984).Google Scholar
Swanwick, Keith (1979) A Basis for Music Education. Windsor: NFER.Google Scholar
Dorothy, Taylor (1979) Music Now. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

4. Others

Eysenck, H. J. (1939) The Validity of Judgements as a Function of the Number of Judges. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24.Google Scholar
Eysneck, H. J. (1947) Dimensions of Personality. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lord, F. M. and Norvick, M. (1968) Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, Mass.: Addison–Wesley.Google Scholar
Siegel, Sidney (1956) Nonparametic Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar