Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:53:54.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding the one-to-one relationship in instrumental/vocal tuition in Higher Education: comparing student and teacher perceptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2011

Helena Gaunt
Helena Gaunt*
Affiliation:
9 Finsbury Park Road, London N4 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The power of one-to-one tuition in Higher Music Education is evidenced by its continuing place at the heart of conservatoire education. The need to examine this student–teacher relationship more closely has been emphasised in the last decades by increasing understanding of processes of student learning in Higher Education as a whole, and in particular the impact which student–teacher relations have on learning. Literature on PhD supervision, for example, has highlighted the depth of applied craft skills made possible in one-to-one interaction, and has also drawn attention to a range of potential difficulties encountered in the supervisory relationship. This paper draws on findings from a study at a conservatoire in the UK, which explored student and teacher perceptions of one-to-one tuition. It analyses student and teacher perspectives on the relationship and considers the match between their perceptions within student–teacher pairs. Findings demonstrate diverse characterisation of the relationship, and varied approaches to extending a social relationship beyond the confines of the lesson. Comparison of student–teacher pairs indicates that the students tended to mirror their teachers' opinions about appropriate social interaction. This was one example of the dynamics of power operating within the one-to-one relationship, although these were rarely discussed explicitly. Such dynamics of power made it difficult in some instances for students to articulate difficulties with learning and to change teacher. There was also evidence of a possible connection between dynamics of power in the relationship and students' reluctance to develop artistic and professional self-direction. The implications of these findings are considered in terms of conceptualising one-to-one tuition, and the need to review the professional framework of its delivery in Higher Music Education.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , July 2011 , pp. 159 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABELES, H. F., GOFFI, J. & LEVASSEUR, S. (1992) The components of effective applied instruction. Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 3 (2), 17–23.Google Scholar
BARRETT, M. S. & GROMKO, J. E. (2007) Provoking the muse: a case study of teaching and learning in music composition. Psychology of Music, 35 (2), 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BLOOM, B. S. (1985) Developing Talent in Young People. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
BROCKBANK, A. & MCGILL, I. (1998) Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
BROOKS, T. (2006) Cultural leadership programme: coaching and mentoring report. Retrieved 4/8/09, from http://www.culturalleadership.org.uk/uploads/documents/COACHING&MENTORING-Brooks_11_19.pdf.Google Scholar
BURT, R. & MILLS, J. (2006) Taking the plunge: the hopes and fears of students as they begin music college. British Journal of Music Education, 23, 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURWELL, K. (2005) A degree of independence: teachers' approaches to instrumental tuition in a university college. British Journal of Music Education, 22, 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURWELL, K. (2006) On musicians and singers. An investigation of different approaches taken by vocal and instrumental teachers in higher education. Music Education Research, 8, 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHESKY, K. (2004) Health Promotion in Schools of Music. Proceedings of the Seminar of the Commission for the Education of the Professional Musician, Barcelona, Escola Superior de Musica de Catalunya, International Society for Music Education.Google Scholar
COHEN, L., MANION, L. & MORRISON, K. (2000) Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
COOPER, P. (1993) Field relations and the problem of authenticity in researching participants’ perceptions of teaching and learning. British Educational Research Journal, 19, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COOPER, P. & MCINTYRE, D. (1993) Commonality in teachers' and pupils’ perceptions of effective classroom learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CREECH, A. & HALLAM, S. (2003) Parent–teacher–pupil interactions in instrumental music tuition: a literature review. British Journal of Music Education, 20, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CREECH, A., PAPAGEORGI, I., DUFFY, C., MORTON, F., HADDON, E., POTTER, J., DE BEZENAC, C., WHYTON, T., HIMONIDES, E. & WELCH, G. (2008) From music student to professional: the process of transition. British Journal of Music Education, 25, 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CROSLING, G. M. & WEBB, G. (2000) Supporting Student Learning: Case studies, Experience and Higher Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
DAVIDSON, J. W., HOWE, M. J. A. & SLOBODA, J. A. (1997) Environmental factors in the development of musical skill over the life span. In Hargreaves, D. J. & North, A. C. (Eds), The Social Psychology of Music (pp. 188–206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DENICOLO, P., ENTWISTLE, N. & HOUNSELL, D. (1992) What is Active Learning? Sheffield: CVCP Universities’ Staff Development and Training Unit.Google Scholar
DONOVAN, A. J. (1994) The interaction of personality traits in applied music teaching. Unpublished thesis, University of Southern Mississippi.Google Scholar
GAUNT, H. (2008) One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: the perceptions of instrumental and vocal teachers. Psychology of Music, 36, 215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GAUNT, H. (2009) One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: the perceptions of instrumental and vocal students. Psychology of Music, 37, 1–31.Google Scholar
GAUNT, H. & PAPAGEORGI, I. (2010) Music in universities and conservatoires. In Hallam, S. & Creech, A. (Eds), Music Education in the 21st Century in the United Kingdom: Achievement, Analysis and Aspiration. London: Institute of Education Press.Google Scholar
GHOLSON, S. A. (1998) Proximal positioning: a strategy of practice in violin pedagogy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 535–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HADDON, E. (2009) Instrumental and vocal teaching: how do students learn to teach? British Journal of Music Education, 26, 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HANKEN, I. M. (2001) Instrumental students' evaluation of applied teaching. Research Alliance of Institutes for Music Education. Proceedings 6, Oslo.Google Scholar
HEPLER, L. E. (1986) The measurement of teacher–student interaction in private music lessons and its relationship to teacher field dependence/field independence. Unpublished PhD thesis, Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
JORGENSEN, H. (2000) Student learning in higher instrumental education: who is responsible? British Journal of Music Education, 17, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KENNELL, R. (1992) Toward a theory of applied music instruction. Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 3 (2), 5–16.Google Scholar
KENNELL, R. (2002) Systematic research in studio instruction in music. In Colwell, R. & Richardson, C. (Eds), The New Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning (pp. 243–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
L'HOMMIDIEU, R. L. (1992) The management of selected educational variables by master studio teachers in music performance. Unpublished PhD thesis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
LEBLER, D. (2006) Student as master? Reflections on a learning innovation in popular music pedagogy. Conference paper at the International Society for Music Education World Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MANTURSZEWSKA, M. (1990) A biographical study of the life-span development of professional musicians. Psychology of Music, 18, 112–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MCPHERSON, G. E. (2009) The role of parents in children's musical development. Psychology of Music, 37 (1), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MEGGINSON, D. & CLUTTERBUCK, D. (2006) Techniques for Coaching and Mentoring. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
MILLS, J. (2002) Conservatoire students' perceptions of the characteristics of effective instrumental and vocal tuition. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 153–154.Google Scholar
MONSON, I. (1996) Saying Something: Jazz Improvisation and Interaction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
NICHOLLS, G. (2002) Developing Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PERSSON, R. (1994) Concert musicians as teachers: on good intentions coming short. European Journal for High Ability, 5 (1), 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PHILLIPS, E. M. & PUGH, D. S. (2005) How to Get a PhD: a Handbook for Students and their Supervisors. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
POWNEY, J. & WATTS, M. (1987) Interviewing in Educational Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
PRESLAND, C. (2005) Conservatoire student and instrumental professor: the student perspective on a complex relationship. British Journal of Music Education, 22, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PROSSER, M. & TRIGWELL, K. (1999) Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
PURSER, D. (2005) Performers as teachers: exploring the teaching approaches of instrumental teachers in conservatoires. British Journal of Music Education, 22, 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RAMSDEN, P. (2003) Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RENSHAW, P. (2006) Lifelong Learning for Musicians: The Place of Mentoring. Retrieved 12/12/09, 2009, from www.lifelonglearninginmusic.org.Google Scholar
ROSENTHAL, R. (1984) The relative effects of guided model, model only, guide only and practice only treatments on the accuracy of advanced instrumentalists’ musical performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32, 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SALMON, P. (1992) Achieving a PhD: Ten Students' Experience. London: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
SCHMIDT, C. P. (1989) Applied music teaching behavior as a function of selected personality variables. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHMIDT, C. P. (1992) Systematic research in applied music instruction: a review of the literature. Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 3 (2), 32–45.Google Scholar
SCHON, D. A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
SCHON, D. A. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
SCHWARTZ, P. & WEBB, G. (1993) Case Studies on Teaching in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
TESCH, R. (1990) Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. Lewes: Falmer.Google Scholar
TRIGWELL, K. (2005) Teaching–research relations, cross-disciplinary collegiality and student learning. Higher Education: the International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 49, 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILLIAMON, A. & THOMPSON, S. (2006) Awareness and incidence of health problems among conservatoire students. Psychology of Music, 34, 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YARBOROUGH, C. (1996) ‘The future of scholarly inquiry in music education’: 1996 senior researcher award acceptance address. Journal of Research in Music Education, 44 (3), 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar