Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:12:06.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technologically mediated composition learning: Josh's story

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

Jan Bolton
Jan Bolton*
Affiliation:
Victoria University, WellingtonNew [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An innovative ICT project called Compose has been implemented in some New Zealand primary schools in an effort to counteract the lack of classroom composition opportunities. Compose combines the use of music software and online learning with attempts to address barriers to primary classroom composition. This article illustrates, through personal narrative, how Compose made successful composition experiences possible for a student in a classroom where no such opportunities had previously existed. The project led to the student acquiring compositional skill and knowledge and a positive music self-concept. Though it is not possible to generalise from a single case study, the findings indicate that Compose could offer a potentially viable way to increase classroom composition learning opportunities.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 41 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ASHWORTH, D. (2007) Electrifying Music: A guide to using ICT in music education. <http://www.musicalfutures.org.uk> Accessed 17 February 2007.+Accessed+17+February+2007.>Google Scholar
BARNES, J. M. (2001) ‘Creativity and composition in music’, in Philpott, C. & Plummeridge, C. (Eds), Issues in Music Teaching (pp. 92–104). London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
BECKSTEAD, D. J. (1998) Composers in Electronic Residence: Music, Technology and Textual Presence. PhD thesis, Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
BRANSFORD, J., BROWN, A. & COCKING, R. (Eds) (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
BRUNER, J. (1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
BURNARD, P. (2000) ‘Making a piece you don't play and forget: children composing and the role of context’, Australian Journal of Music Education, 14 (1), 30–9.Google Scholar
CHASE, S. E. (2005) ‘Narrative inquiry: multiple lenses, approaches, voices’, in Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S.. (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd edn (pp. 651–79). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
CLANDININ, D. J. & CONNELLY, F. M. (1998) ‘Personal experience methods’, in Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S.. (Eds) Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials (pp. 150–78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
CLANDININ, D. J. & CONNELLY, F. M. (2000) Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
DE GOLDI, K. & COLLEY, J. (2004) Clubs a Lolly Leopold story. Wellington, New Zealand: Trapeze.Google Scholar
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TRAINING, AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT (2005) The National Review of School Music Education. Canberra: Reviews and Evaluations.Google Scholar
DODDINGTON, C. (2004) ‘Are we in time? Some comments arising from recent research into the initial training of primary teachers in the arts’, Music Education Research, 6 (1), 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DYE, S. (2005) ‘Kiwi children the world's greatest ‘cyber athletes’’, The Weekend Herald, 16 July, A16.Google Scholar
EDUCATION REVIEW OFFICE NZ [ERO]. (2004) Quality of Teaching in Years 4 and 8: Music. Wellington: ERO.Google Scholar
FLOCKTON, L. & CROOKS, T. (2005) Music Assessment Results 2004, National Education Monitoring Report 32. Dunedin: Otago University Educational Assessment Research Unit.Google Scholar
GALL, M. & BREEZE, N. (2005) ‘Music composition lessons: the multimodal affordances of technology’, Educational Review, 57 (4), 415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HARRIS, D. & BOYD, S. (1998) A Link to Learning: The Use of Computers by Children with Disabilities. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
HICKEY, M. (1997) ‘The computer as a tool in creative music making’, Research Studies in Music Education, 8, 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HO, W-C. (2004) ‘Use of information technology and music learning in the search for quality education’, British Journal of Educational Technology, 35 (1), 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOOVER, J. & PATTON, J. (1997) Curriculum Adaptations for Students with Learning and Behaviour Problems: Principals and Practices, 2nd edn.Texas: Pro.Ed.Google Scholar
HUNG, D. & KHINE, M. S. (Eds) (2006) Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JENNINGS, K. (2003) ‘Toy symphony: An international music technology project for children’, Music Education International, 2, 3–21.Google Scholar
JONASSEN, D. H. & STROBEL, J. (2006) ‘Modeling for meaningful learning’, in Hung, D. & Khine, M. S.. (Eds) Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies (pp. 1–27). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
MASON, A. (2006) ‘Effectiveness and delight in an online learning community. A learner-centered approach’, Computers in New Zealand Schools, 18 (1), 35–9.Google Scholar
MENC (2002) ‘Music Education Facts and Figures’. The National Association for Music Education, <http://www.menc.org/information/advocate/facts.html> (accessed 28 August 2006)+(accessed+28+August+2006)>Google Scholar
NZSME (1999) ‘Response to the draft document’, The Arts in the New Zealand Curriculum <http://www.nzsme.org.nz/curric.html> (accessed 22 September 2005).+(accessed+22+September+2005).>Google Scholar
NOBLE, C. & BRADFORD, W. (2000) Getting it right for boys . . . and girls. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
PAPERT, S. (1994) The Children's Machine. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
PASSEY, D. & ROGERS, C., with MACHELL, J. & MCHUGH, G. (2004) The Motivational Effect of ICT on Pupils: A Department for Education and Skills Research Project. 4RP/2002/050-3. Nottingham: DfES.Google Scholar
PUSEY, M. (2005) ‘Groove to the rhythm with the relevant rap’, Times Educational Supplement, <http://www.tes.co.uk/search/story/?story_id=2150968> (accessed 7 September 2006)+(accessed+7+September+2006)>Google Scholar
RAMONDT, L. & CHAPMAN, C. (1998) Online Learning Communities. <http://www.ultralab.net/papers/online_learning_communities/> (accessed 20 August 2006).+(accessed+20+August+2006).>Google Scholar
REESE, S. (2001) ‘Tools for thinking in sound’, Music Educators Journal, 88 (1), 42–6, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REYNOLDS, J. W. (1995) ‘Music education and student self-concept: A review of literature’, Research Perspectives in Music Education. <http://music.arts.usf.edu/pages/rpme.htm> (accessed 21 September 2006).+(accessed+21+September+2006).>Google Scholar
REYNOLDS, N. (2002) ‘Computers, creativity, and composition in the primary school: an analysis of two compositions’, Australian Journal of Music Education, 1, 16–26.Google Scholar
SAVAGE, J. (2005) ‘Working towards a theory for music technologies in the classroom: How pupils engage with and organise sounds with new technologies’, British Journal of Music Education, 22 (2), 167–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAVAGE, J. & CHALLIS, M. (2002) ‘A digital arts curriculum? Practical ways forward’, Music Education Research, 4 (1), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCRIPP, L. (2002) ‘An overview of research on music and learning’, Critical Links: Learning in the Arts and Student Academic and Social Development. Arts Education Partnership. <http://www.aep-arts.org/cllinkspage.htm> (accessed 2 November 2005)+(accessed+2+November+2005)>Google Scholar
SEDDON, F. A. & O'NEILL, S. A. (2001) ‘An evaluation study of computer-based compositions by children with and without prior experience of formal instrumental music tuition’. Psychology of Music, 29 (1), 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STAUFFER, S. (2001) ‘Composing with computers: Meg makes music’, Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 150, 1–20.Google Scholar
STEVENS, R. S. (2003) National report on trends in school music education provision in Australia. The Music Council of Australia with Australian Society of Music Education and the Australian Music Association. <www.mca.org.au/StevensReport.htm> (accessed 2 February 2005)+(accessed+2+February+2005)>Google Scholar
TAPSCOTT, D. (1998) Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
TREWERN, A. & FRY, M. (2001) ‘Venturing into Uncertainty: Different perspectives on Involvement in an Online Curriculum Project – Rescue Me!’ Computers in NZ Schools, 13 (1), 11–22.Google Scholar
WEBSTER, P. (1998) ‘Young children and music technology’, Research Studies in Music Education, 11, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WYLIE, C. & HIPKINS, R. (2006) Growing Independence: Competent Learners @ 14 Project. Wellington: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
YOUNG, V. (2001) ‘Teacher development in music’, in Philpott, C. & Plummeridge, C.. (Eds) Issues in Music Teaching (pp. 209–23). London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar