Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:36:45.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

School and Music-school Collaboration in Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Abstract

How do we channel teenagers' interest in music? What guides our music teaching today, and what possibilities are there for development and change? These questions have given me occasion to take a closer look at the situation of music teaching today.

Many teachers have asked themselves how we in the comprehensive school and the music school can look after the zest and creative power which are often exhibited by teenagers when they perform music freely, not under the direct control of a teacher. I have also, on quite a number of occasions during lessons, registered resignation and tedium on the part of pupils.

The consequence has been drop-out from music school – sometimes experienced as a relief both by teacher and pupil. Despite the fact that the educational orientation has been based on a ‘musical encounter’ between teacher and pupil, this encounter has not occurred (or has sometimes occurred with a difference which certainly might have been corrected). But the pupil's great interest in music has not diminished – great interest, that is, in music as the pupil understands the term!

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bjørkvold, J-R. (1991). Den musiska människan. Barnet, sången och lekfullheten genom livets faser. Stockholm: Runa Förlag.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cook, N. (1990). Music, Imagination & Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, C. (1977). Classroom Interaction: A study of pedagogical roles in the teaching process. Diss. Stockholm: Liber Läromodel.Google Scholar
Francés, R. (1967). Communication persuasive et communication esthétique. In Journal de Psychologie, 4.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, D. (1986). The Developmental Psychology of Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, P.W. (1968, new ed. 1990). Life in Classrooms. Reisssued with a new introduction, New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Lundberg, B. (1990). Med Kant i katedern och Madonna i bänken. In Svensklärarnas årsskrift. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Nielsen, F.V. (1994). Almen Musikdidaktik. Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers' Forlag.Google Scholar
Schepping, W. (1987). Zur schuldidaktischen Problematik einer zweispurigen Musikunterweisung in allgemeinbildender Schule und Jugend musikschule. In Musikpädagogische Forschung, Band 8. Laaber: Laaber Verlag.Google Scholar
Small, C. (1977). Music Society Education. London: John Calder.Google Scholar
Stålhammar, B. (1995). Samspel. Grundskola Musikskola i samverkan. En Studie av den pedagogiska och musikaliska Interaktionen i en klassrumssituation. Diss. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet.Google Scholar
Swanwick, K. (1994). Musical Knowledge Intuition, Analysis, and Music Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thavenius, J. (1987). Kulturens svarta hål. Stockholm: Symposion Bokförlag.Google Scholar
Vulliamy, G. (1977). Music and the mass culture debate. In Shepherd, J., Virden, P., Vulliamy, G. and Wishart, T. (eds), Whose music? A sociology of musical languages. London: Latimer.Google Scholar
Ziehe, T. (1986). Ny ungdom. Om ovanliga läroprocesser. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar