Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:33:00.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pre-service music teachers' satisfaction: person–environment fit approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2012

Serkan Perkmen*
Affiliation:
Balikesir Üniversitesi Necatibey Egitim Fakultesi BOTE, Balikesir, [email protected]
Beste Cevik
Affiliation:
Balikesir Üniversitesi Necatibey Egitim Fakultesi Muzik Egitimi, Balikesir, [email protected]
Mahir Alkan
Affiliation:
Balikesir Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Kimya Bölümü, Balikesir, [email protected]
*
Corresponding author: Serkan Perkmen.

Abstract

Guided by three theoretical frameworks in vocational psychology, (i) theory of work adjustment, (ii) two factor theory, and (iii) value discrepancy theory, the purpose of this study was to investigate Turkish pre-service music teachers' values and the role of fit between person and environment in understanding vocational satisfaction. Participants were 85 students enrolled in the department of music education in a Turkish university. The Minnesota Importance Questionnaire (MIQ) was used to examine the participants’ values in six dimensions: achievement, comfort, status, altruism, safety and autonomy. Results revealed that the pre-service teachers value achievement most followed by autonomy, which suggests that they would like to have a sense of accomplishment and control in their future job. The degree to which their values fit their predictions about future work environment was found to be highly correlated with vocational satisfaction. These results provided evidence that the vocational theories used in the current study offers a helpful and different perspective to understand the pre-service teachers' satisfaction with becoming a music teacher in the future. We believe that researchers in the field of music education may use these theories and MIQ to examine the role of values in pre-service and in-service music teachers' job satisfaction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BERRY, L. M. (1998) Psychology at Work: An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2nd Edition. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
CEVIK, D. B. (2011) Personality self-perceptions of pre-service music teachers in relation to departmental satisfaction. International Journal of Music Education, 29, 212228.Google Scholar
CEVIK, D. B. & PERKMEN, S. (2010) Holland'ın Kariyer Teorisine Göre Müzik Öğretmeni Adaylar'nın Kişiliği (Pre-service Music Teachers' Personality Based on Holland's Theory of Career Choice). International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications – ICONTE 2010, November 2010, Antalya, Turkey.Google Scholar
DAWIS, R. V. (2002) Person–environment correspondence theory. In Brown, D. (Ed.), Career Choice and Development (pp. 427464). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
DAWIS, R. V. & LOFQUIST, L. H. (1984) A Psychological Theory of Work Adjustment. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
GOTTFREDSON, G. D. & HOLLAND, J. L. (1996) Dictionary of Holland Occupational Codes. 2nd Edition. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
HACKMAN, J. R. & OLDHAM, G. R. (1975) Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159170.Google Scholar
HERZBERG, F. (1966) Work and the Nature of Man. Cleveland, OH: World Publishing.Google Scholar
HOLLAND, J. L. (1959) A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 3545.Google Scholar
KEMP, A. E. (1982) Personality traits of successful music teachers. Psychology of Music, Special Issue, 7275.Google Scholar
KRUEGER, R. J. (1976) An investigation of personality and music teaching success. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 47, 1625.Google Scholar
KUNIN, T. (1955) The construction of a new type of attitude measure. Personnel Psychology, 8, 6567.Google Scholar
LOCKE, E. A. (1969) What is job satisfaction? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157189.Google Scholar
LOFQUIST, L. H. & DAWIS, R. V. (1991) Essentials of Person–Environment Correspondence Counseling. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
PARSONS, F. (1909) Choosing a Vocation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
ROUNDS, J. B., HENLEY, G. A., DAWIS, R. V., LOFQUIST, L. H. & WEISS, D. J. (1981) Manual for the Minnesota Importance Questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
SCHNEIDER, E. H. & CADY, H. L. (1965) Evaluation and Synthesis of Research Studies Relating to Music Education. USOE, Cooperative Research E-016, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
SPINELLI, M. A. & CANAVOS, G. C. (2000) Investigating the relationship between employee satisfaction and guest satisfaction. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, December, 2933.Google Scholar
SPOKANE, A. R., LUCHETTA, E. J. & RICHWINE, M. H. (2002) Holland's theory of personalities in work environments. In Brown, D. (Ed.), Career Choice and Development (pp. 373426). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
TEACHOUT, D. J. (2001) The relationship between personality and teaching effectiveness of music student teachers. Psychology of Music, 29, 179192.Google Scholar
VUUST, P., GEBAUER, L., JØRGENSEN, S., HANSEN, N.C., MØLLER, A. & LINNET, J. (2010) Personality influences career choice – sensation seeking in professional musicians. Music Education Research, 12, 219230.Google Scholar
WINK, R. L. (1970) The relationship of self-concept and selected personality variables to achievement in music student teaching. Journal of Research in Music Education, 18, 234241.Google Scholar
WUBBENHORST, T. (1994) Personality characteristics of music educators and performers. Psychology of Music, 22, 6374.Google Scholar