Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:17:25.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Informal and formal knowledge: The curriculum conception of two rock graduates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2012

Graham McPhail
Graham McPhail*
Affiliation:
School of Critical Studies in Education, Faculty of Education, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92 601, Symonds Street, Auckland 1035, New [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Informal learning has become a prominent theme in music education literature in recent times. Many writers have called for a new emphasis on informal knowledge and pedagogy as the way forward for music education. The position taken in this paper is that a central issue for music education is the accommodation of a tension between types of knowledge and the ways of knowing strongly associated with popular and classical of music – socially acquired informal knowledge and socially developed but formally acquired disciplinary knowledge. Approaches to curriculum conception and realisation observed in a recent series of case studies in New Zealand secondary schools suggest that a key factor in student engagement is the degree to which teachers can create links between informal and formal knowledge so that students’ understanding and conceptual abilities can be extended across these knowledge boundaries. The teaching approaches of two recent graduates in rock music are discussed to support the social realist argument that a ‘progressive’ approach to curriculum involves creating links between informal and formal knowledge rather than replacing one with the other or dissolving the boundaries between them. Through seeing the two types of knowledge as necessarily interconnected within educational contexts, the epistemic integrity of classroom music is maintained. In this way students are able to recognise themselves and their aspirations while also recognising the potential and power of the foundational knowledge of the discipline.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 43 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ALLSUP, R. E. (2003) Transformational education and critical music pedagogy: Examining the link between culture and learning. Music Education Research, 5 (1), 5–12.Google Scholar
ALLSUP, R. E. (2008) Creating an educational framework for popular music in public schools: Anticipating the second-wave. Visions of Research in Music Education (Special Edition – Beyond Lucy Green: Operationalizing Theories of Informal Music Learning), 12, 1–12. Retrieved 24 January 2009 from: http://www-usr.rider.edu/~vrme/Google Scholar
BARRETT, J. (2009) Graduate music education as a site for reconfiguring curriculum development. Research Studies in Music Education, 31 (1), 6–19.Google Scholar
BERNSTEIN, B. (2000) Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
BOWMAN, W. (2004) ‘Pop’ Goes . . .? Taking popular music seriously. In Rodriguez, C. X. (Ed.), Bridging the Gap: Popular Music Education (pp. 29–50). Reston, VA: National Association for Music Education (USA).Google Scholar
CAMPBELL, P. S. (2001) Unsafe suppositions? Cutting across cultures on questions of music's transmission. Music Education Research, 3, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHRISTIE, F. (2002) Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Functional Perspective. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
CORBIN, J., & STRAUSS, A. (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
DAVIS, S. & BLAIR, D. (2011) Popular music in American teacher education: a glimpse into a secondary methods course. International Journal of Music Education, 29, 124–140.Google Scholar
ELLIOTT, D. (1995) Music Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
FEICHAS, H. (2010) Bridging the gap: Informal learning practices as a pedagogy of integration. British Journal of Music Education, 27, 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FINNEY, J. (2007) Music education as identity project in a world of electronic desires. In Finney, J. & Burnard, P. (Eds.), Music Education with Digital Technology (pp. 9–20). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
FINNEY, J. & PHILPOTT, C. (2010) Informal learning and meta-pedagogy in initial teacher education in England. British Journal of Music Education, 27, 7–19.Google Scholar
FOLKESTAD, G. (2006) Formal and informal learning situations or practices vs formal and informal ways of learning. British Journal of Music Education, 23, 135–145.Google Scholar
GAMBLE, J. (2006) Theory and practice in the vocational curriculum. In Young, M. & Gamble, J. (Eds.), Knowledge, Curriculum and Qualifications for South African Further Education (pp. 87–103). Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
GAMBLE, J. (2010) Exploring the transmission of moral order as invisible semiotic mediator of tacit knowledge. In Singh, P., Sadovnik, A. R. & Semel, S. F. (Eds.), Toolkits, Translation Devices and Conceptual Accounts: Essays on Basil Bernstein's Sociology of Knowledge (pp. 121–141). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
GREEN, L. (2002) How Popular Musicians Learn: A Way Ahead for Music Education. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
GREEN, L. (2008) Music, Informal Learning and the School: A New Classroom Pedagogy. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
MATON, K. & MOORE, R. (2010) Social Realism, Knowledge and the Sociology of Education: Coalitions of the mind. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
MCENEANEY, E. H. & MEYER, J. W. (2000) The content of the curriculum: An institutional perspective. In Hallinan, M. T. (Ed.), Handbook of the Sociology of Education (pp. 189–211). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
MCPHAIL, G. (2012 a) The canon or the kids: Music teachers and the recontextualisation of classical and popular music in the secondary school curriculum. EdD thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
MCPHAIL, G. (2012 b) From singular to overcrowded region: curriculum change in senior secondary school music in New Zealand. British Journal of Music Education. iFirst Article, 1–22. Retrieved 5 April 2012 from: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1017/S0265051712000058Google Scholar
Ministry of Education (2009) Principles that Underpin Key Competencies. Retrieved from http://keycompetencies.tki.org.nz/In-teaching/Resources/Underpin.Google Scholar
MOORE, R. (2007) Going critical: the problem of problematizing knowledge in education studies. Critical Studies in Education, 48, 25–41.Google Scholar
MOORE, R. (2010) Knowledge structures and the canon: a preference for judgements. In Maton, K. & Moore, R. (Eds.), Social Realism, Knowledge and the Sociology of Education: Coalitions of the Mind (pp. 131–153). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
MULLER, J. (2006) Differentiation and progression in the curriculum. In Young, M. & Gamble, J. (Eds.), Knowledge, Curriculum and Qualifications for South African Further Education (pp. 66–86). Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
RATA, E. (2011) The politics of knowledge in education. British Educational Research Journal, 38, 103–124.Google Scholar
STAKE, R. E. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
TAGG, P. (2002) Text and context as co-requisites in the popular analysis of music. Paper prepared for conference on Musical Text and Context, Department of Musicology, University of Padua at Cremona, April 2002. Retrieved 1 April 2004, from http://www.tagg.org/articles/cremona.htmlGoogle Scholar
THOMAS, D. (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246.Google Scholar
VÄKEVÄ, L. (2010) Garage band or GarageBand®? Remixing musical futures. British Journal of Music Education, 27, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WALKER, R. (2007) Music Education: Cultural Values, Social Change and Innovation. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
WALKER, R. (2009) Beethoven or Britney? The Great Divide in Music Education. Platform Papers: Quarterly Essays on the Performing Arts, 20.Google Scholar
WHEELAHAN, L. (2010) Why Knowledge Matters in the Curriculum. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
WRIGHT, R. & KANELLOPOULOS, P. (2010) Informal music learning, improvisation and teacher education. British Journal of Music Education, 27, 71–87.Google Scholar
YOUNG, M. F. D. (2008) Bringing Knowledge Back in: From Social Constructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
YOUNG, M. F. D. (2010 a) Why educators must differentiate knowledge from experience. Pacific Asian Education, 22, 9–20. Retrieved 20 October 2011 from http://pacificcircleconsortium.org/PAEJournal.htmlGoogle Scholar
YOUNG, M. F. D. (2010 b) The future of education in a knowledge society: the radical case for a subject-based curriculum. Pacific Asian Education, 22, 21–32. Retrieved 20 October 2011 from http://pacificcircleconsortium.org/PAEJournal.htmlGoogle Scholar
YOUNG, M. F. D. & MULLER, J. (2010) Three educational scenarios for the future: lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45, 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar