Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:45:22.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A combination of one-to-one teaching and small group teaching in higher music education in Norway – a good model for teaching?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2014

Bjørg Julsrud Bjøntegaard
Bjørg Julsrud Bjøntegaard*
Affiliation:
Norwegian Academy of Music, Postboks 5190, Majorstua, N – 0302 Oslo, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Instrumental teachers in higher music education in Norway and elsewhere traditionally organise their teaching as individual lessons with one teacher and one student. This paper takes a closer look at how a horn teacher at the Norwegian Academy of Music has organised her weekly teaching in individual, small group and master class lessons with all her students. The project being described in the paper has since been extended to other instruments, but this paper concentrates on the horn model. The main focus is on small group lessons where the students themselves play and comment on fellow students’ performances. The evidence suggests that a combination of teaching in individual, small group and master class lessons is the best way of educating students as responsible, reflective and professional musicians.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 23 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BRAND, M. (2004) Collectivistic versus individualistic cultures: a comparison of American, Australian and Chinese music education students’ self-esteem. Music Education Research, 6, 57–66.Google Scholar
BRÄNDSTRÖM, S. (1994) Self-formulated goals and self-evaluation in music education. Bulletin. Special Issue. The 15th International Society for Music Education. ISME Research Seminar, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
BREW, A. (1999) Towards autonomous assessment: using self-assessment and peer assessment. In Brown, S. & Glasner, A. (Eds), Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches (pp. 159–171). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
BRUNER, J. S. (1996) The Culture of Education. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
BURT, R. & MILLS, J. (2006) Taking the plunge: the hopes and fears of students as they begin music college. British Journal of Music Education, 23, 51–73.Google Scholar
BURWELL, K. (2005) A degree of independence: teachers’ approaches to instrumental tuition in a university college. British Journal of Music Education, 22, 199–215.Google Scholar
CREECH, A. (2012) Interpersonal behavior in one-to-one instrumental lessons: an observational analysis. British Journal of Music Education, 29, 387–407.Google Scholar
CREECH, A., GAUNT, H., HALLAM, S. & ROBERTSON, L. (2009) Conservatoire students’ perceptions of Master Classes. British Journal of Music Education, 26, 315–331.Google Scholar
DANIEL, R. (2004) Innovations in piano teaching: a small-group model for the tertiary level. Music Education Research, 6, 23–43.Google Scholar
DANIEL, R. (2006) Exploring music instrument teaching and learning environments: video analysis as a means of elucidating process and learning outcomes. Music Education Research, 8, 191–215.Google Scholar
FISCHER, C. C. (2006) Application of selected cooperative learning techniques to group piano instruction. Ph.D. thesis. University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
FROELICH, H. (2002) Thoughts on schools of music and colleges of education as places of ‘rites and rituals’: consequences for research on practicing. In Hanken, I. M., Nielsen, S. G. & Nerland, M. (Eds), Research in and for Higher Music Education. Festschrift for Harald Jørgensen (pp. 149–165). Oslo: NMH-publikasjoner.Google Scholar
GAUNT, H. (2006) Student and teacher perceptions of one-to-one instrumental and vocal tuition in a conservatoire. Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy, Institute of Education, London University.Google Scholar
GAUNT, H. (2008) One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: the perceptions of instrumental and vocal teachers. Psychology of Music, 36, 215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GAUNT, H. (2009) One-to-one tuition in a conservatoire: the perceptions of instrumental and vocal students. Psychology of Music, 38, 178–208.Google Scholar
GAUNT, H. (2011) Understanding the one-to-one relationship in instrumental/vocal tuition in Higher Education: comparing student and teacher perceptions. British Journal of Music Education, 28, 159–179.Google Scholar
GAUNT, H., CREECH, A., LONG, M. & HALLAM, S. (2012) Supporting conservatoire students towards professional integration: one-to-one tuition and the potential of mentoring. Music Education Research, 14, 25–43.Google Scholar
GHOLSON, S. A. (1998) Proximal positioning: a strategy of practice in violin pedagogy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 535–545.Google Scholar
HADDON, E. (2011) Multiple teachers: multiple gains? British Journal of Music Education, 28, 69–85.Google Scholar
HALLAM, S. (1998) Instrumental Teaching. A Practical Guide to Better Teaching and Learning. Oxford: Heinemann Educational Publishers.Google Scholar
HANKEN, I. (2008) Teaching and learning music performance: the Master Class. Finnish Journal of Music Education, 11, 26–36.Google Scholar
HANKEN, I. (2011) The benefits of the master class. Nordic Research in Music Education Yearbook, Vol 12 2010 (pp. 149–160). Oslo: NMH publikasjoner.Google Scholar
JOHANSSON, K. (2013) Undergraduate students’ ownership of musical learning: obstacles and options in one-to-one teaching. British Journal of Music Education, 30, 277–295.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, D. W. & JOHNSON, R. T. (1999) Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
JUUTI, S. & LITTLETON, K. (2010) Musical identities in transition: solo-piano students’ accounts of entering the academy. Psychology of Music, 38, 482–496.Google Scholar
JØRGENSEN, H. (2000) Student learning in higher instrumental education: who is responsible? British Journal of Music Education, 17, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KARLSSON, J. & JUSLIN, P. N. (2008) Musical expression: an observational study of instrumental teaching. Psychology of Music, 38, 309–334.Google Scholar
KENNEL, R. (2002) Systematic research in studio instruction in music. In Colwell, R. & Richardson, C. (Eds), The New Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning (pp. 243–256). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
KINGSBURY, H. (1988) Music, Talent and Performance. A Conservatory Cultural System. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
KOOPMAN, C., SMIT, N., DE VUGT, A., DENEER, P. & DEN OUDEN, J. (2007) Focus on practice-relationships between lessons on the primary instrument and individual practice in conservatoire education. Music Education Research, 9, 373–397.Google Scholar
LAUKKA, P. (2004) Instrumental music teachers’ views on expressivity: a report from music conservatoires. Music Education Research, 6, 45–56.Google Scholar
LAVE, J. & WENGER, E. (1991) Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LUPTON, M. & BRUCE, C. (2010) Craft, process and art: teaching and learning music composition in higher education. British Journal of Music Education, 27, 271–287.Google Scholar
NERLAND, M. (2007) One-to-one teaching as cultural practice: two case studies from an academy of music. Music Education Research, 9, 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NERLAND, M. & HANKEN, I. M. (2002) Academies of music as arenas for education: some reflections on the institutional construction of teacher-student relationships. In Hanken, I. M., Nielsen, S. G. & Nerland, M. (Eds) Research in and for Higher Music Education. Festschrift for Harald Jorgensen (pp. 167–186). Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.Google Scholar
PAPAGEORGI, I., CREECH, A., HADDON, E., MORTON, F., DE BEZENAC, C., HIMONIDES, E., POTTER, J., DUFFY, C., WHYTON, T. & WELCH, G. (2010) Perceptions and predictions of expertise in advanced musical learners. Psychology of Music, 38, 31–66.Google Scholar
PERSSON, R. S. (1994) Control before shape – on mastering the clarinet: a case study on commonsense teaching. British Journal of Music Education, 11, 223–238.Google Scholar
SCHÖN, D. A. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
SEIPP, N. (1976) A Comparison of Class and Private Music Instruction. Ph.D. thesis. West Virginia University.Google Scholar
TRIANTAFYLLAKI, A. (2005) A call for more instrumental music teaching research. Music Education Research, 7, 383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TRIANTAFYLLAKI, A. (2010) ‘Workplace landscapes’ and the construction of performance teachers’ identity: the case of advanced music training institutions in Greece. British Journal of Music Education, 27, 185–201.Google Scholar
USZLER, M., GORDON, S. & SMITH, S. M. (2000) The Well-Tempered Keyboard Teacher, 2nd edn.New York, NY: Schiermer Books.Google Scholar
WEST, T. & ROSTVALL, A. (2003) A study of interaction and learning in instrumental teaching. International Journal of Music Education, 40, 16–27.Google Scholar
WÖLLNER, C. & GINSBORG, J. (2011) Team teaching in the conservatoire: the views of music performance staff and students. British Journal of Music Education, 28, 301–323.Google Scholar
YOUNG, V., BURWELL, K. & PICKUP, D. (2003) Areas of study and teaching strategies in instrumental teaching: a case study research project. Music Education Research, 5, 139–155.Google Scholar