Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:40:15.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why monopoly failed: the rise and fall of Société La Fuchsine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

Anthony S. Travis ,
Willem J. Hornix ,
Robert Bud  and
Henk van den Belt
Henk van den Belt
Affiliation:
Vakgroep Toegepaste Filosofie, Wageningen Agricultural University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Historians are invariably wiser after the event. Their approaches to the subject of this paper, the Société La Fuchsine, make no exceptions to this rule. That company was formed in December 1863 with the participation of the Crédit Lyonnais bank to exploit the patent monopoly on the synthetic dyestuff known as fuchsine, and its derivatives, of the Lyons firm of Renard frères et Franc. No one could have foreseen that before the close of the decade this whole adventure would end in utter failure. In the eyes of contemporaries La Fuchsine was one of the most impressive and awe-inspiring firms of the European dyestuffs industry in the 1860s. Yet by 1868 La Fuchsine was virtually bankrupt, although it dragged out its legal existence until 1875. However, in every other sense it was already dead well before that date.

Type
Research Article
Information
The British Journal for the History of Science , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 45 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I wish to thank Anthony S. Travis, Willem J. Hornix, Ernst Homburg, and Bart Gremmen for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.

1 Caro, H., ‘Ueber die Entwicklung der Theerfarben-Industrie’, Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft (1892), 25, 1031–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Jaubert, G., Historique de l'industrie suisse des matières colorantes artificielles, Bâle, 1896, 18.Google Scholar

3 Jaquet, N., Die Entwicklung und volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung der schweizerischen Teerfarbenindustrie, Basel, 1921, 20.Google Scholar

4 Beer, J. J., The Emergence of the German Dye industry, Urbana, 1959, 35.Google Scholar

5 Haber, L. F., The Chemical Industry During the 19th Century, Oxford, 1958, 202.Google Scholar

6 van den Belt, H., ‘Action at a distance: A. W. Hofmann and the French patent disputes about aniline red (1860–1863), or how a scientist may influence legal decisions without appearing in court’, in Expert Evidence: Interpreting Science in the Law (ed. Smith, R. and Wynne, B.), London and New York, 1989, 184–209.Google Scholar

7 ‘Raffard contre Renard frères et Franc. Réponse aux erreurs de l'avocat de MM. Renard’, 1866Google Scholar, Lyons (Archives municipales de Lyon, Couleurs d'aniline, 305. 694).

8 Moyret, M., Traite de teinture des soies, Lyons, 1877, 13.Google Scholar

9 Drohojowska, A., Les grandes industries de la France, Paris, 1882, 216–17 (note).Google Scholar

10 ‘Nécrologie Verguin’, Moniteur Scientifique (1865), 7, 42.Google Scholar

11 Van den Belt, , op. cit. (6), 11.Google Scholar

12 Jaquet, , op. cit. (3), 17.Google Scholar

13 Letters to Monsieur le Président de la Chambre du Commerce de Lyon, 29 August and 27 September 1861, Chambre du Commerce de Lyon, Lyons.

14 Dossier Renard et Franc, Série Établissements Insalubres, Archives du Rhône (AR), Lyons; Renard frères et Franc also produced dyes at 43 quai Pierre-Seize, Lyons. Apart from this, the Renard brothers kept their silk-dyeing ateliers at 53, quai Pierre-Seize (see Figure 1).

15 Chateau, T., Nouvel Manuel Complet Théorique et Pratique de la Fabrication et de l'Emploi des Couleurs d'Aniline, Paris, 1868, ii, 375 (footnote).Google Scholar

16 de Laire, E., ‘Notice sur Georges de Laire’, Bulletin de la Société Chimique de Paris (1909), 5, p. 11.Google Scholar

17 Moniteur Scientifique (1861), 3, 296–7.Google Scholar

18 Frémy, M., Encyclopédie Chimique, Tome X, Applications de chimie organique. Matières Colorantes. Série aromatique, par C. Girard et A. Pabst, Paris, 1892, 413–14.Google Scholar The older name Renard frères et Franc continued to be used.

19 This transpires also from the ‘Articles of Association of Perkin and Company Limited’.

20 Bleekrode, S., ‘Blauw, rood, violet en groen uit steenkoolteer’, Opus Posthumus ofwel Nieuw Tijdschrift gewijd aan alle takken van volksvlijt, nijverheid etc. (1862), without volume number, 3–35.Google Scholar

21 Drohojowska, , op. cit. (9), 218–19.Google Scholar Drohojowska's account draws partial support from the Statuts of La Fuchsine. Article 6 of these Statuts stipulates that the Société will pay, in Fayolle's place, the seven remaining yearly instalments of 20000 francs to Verguin. I have therefore changed the number of annual instalments given by Drohojowska from seven to ten.

22 An official authorization for making benzene, nitrobenzene and aniline had been requested. When the authorization was delivered on 3 November 1860, the public health authorities remarked: ‘Since its founding, the factory has passed into the hands of Messrs. Fayolle & Cie.’ (Dossier Brédin-Fayolle, Série Etablissements Insalubres, AR, Lyons).

23 ‘Statuts de La Fuchsine’, Art. 5, Infra 7, (1863), Série: Actes de Société, AR, Lyons.

24 ‘Note explicative contre La Fuchsine’, cited in Jean Bouvier, Le Crédit Lyonnais de 1863 à 1882, Paris, 1961, 376.

25 Caro, , op. cit. (1), 1033.Google Scholar

26 Van den Belt, op. cit. (6).

27 Bouvier, J., op. cit. (24), 377.Google Scholar

28 Ibid.

29 Moniteur Scientifique (1864), 6, 65.Google Scholar

30 Bouvier, , op. cit. (24), 376.Google Scholar

31 Caro, , op. cit. (1), 1031.Google Scholar

32 ‘Girard, de Laire et Pelouze contre La Fuchsine, Consultations: 1° Mr. Hébert 2° Mr. Bricod 3° Mr. Grandmanche de Beaulieu’, Lyon, , 1868, 25Google Scholar, Archives Municipales de Lyon, Couleurs d'aniline, 701.260, Lyons.

33 This confirms my interpretation that the granting of shares to the Renards, Girard, de Laire, Pelouze, and Fayolle was not compensation for any of the patents and licences that each of them contributed. The total attributed value of the plants would be 1,200,000 francs; this corresponds exactly with the value of all the shares granted to Renard frères et Franc and to Fayolle both for their apports immobiliers and for their so-called apports mobiliers.

34 ‘Rapport des commissaires sur l'exercise 1865, La Fuchsine’, Série: Actes de Société, AR, Lyons.

35 Chateau, , op. cit. (15), ii, 440.Google Scholar

36 ‘Rapport des commissaires sur l'exercise 1865, La Fuchsine’, op. cit. (34).

37 de Laire, G., ‘Un des heureux de La Fuchsine’, Moniteur Scientifique (1868), 10, 1117–18.Google Scholar

38 There was apparently some magic about the size of the Société's capital; on all letter headings, La Fuchsine always showed its capital as 4 million francs.

39 de Laire, G., op. cit. (37), 1118.Google Scholar

40 Procès-Verbal, , 3 10 1862Google Scholar, Dossier Renard et Franc, Série Etablissements Insalubres, AR, Lyons.

41 Letter from the Procureur-Impérial to the Prefect, 29 October 1862, Dossier Renard et Franc, AR, Lyons.

42 Charvet, H., ‘Etude sur une épidémie qui a sévi parmi les ouvriers employés à la fabrication de la fuchsine’, Annales de Hygiène Publique (1863), 20, 310.Google Scholar

43 Chevallier, A., ‘De la fuchsine, de sa préparation, des accidents qui peuvent en résulter relativement aux ouvriers et des dangers graves pour les habitants des localités près desquelles sont situés les fabriques’, Annales de Hygiène Publique (1865), 25, 16–18.Google Scholar

44 jeune, Guinon to the Prefect, 12 07 1866Google Scholar, Dossier Brédin-Fayolle, Etablissements Insalubres, AR, Lyons.

45 The Prefect to the superintendent of police, 7 February 1868, Dossier Renard et Franc, AR, Lyons.

46 La Fuchsine to the Prefect, 23 September 1865, Dossier Brédin-Fayolle, AR, Lyons.

47 The ‘Mairie St. Rambert-l'Īle-Barbe’ to the Prefect, 22 11 1865Google Scholar, Dossier Brédin-Fayolle, AR, Lyons.

48 Report of the Conseil d'hygiène publique et de Salubrité, 17 May 1866, Dossier Brédin-Fayolle, AR, Lyons.

49 Op. cit. (44).

50 Guinon jeune to the Prefect, 27 July 1866, Dossier Brédin-Fayolle, AR, Lyons.

51 Ibid.

52 Glénard, M. to the Prefect, 14 11 1866Google Scholar, Dossier Brédin-Fayolle, AR, Lyons.

53 Cayez, P., Crises et croissance de l'industrie lyonnaise 1850–1900, Paris, 1977, 229.Google Scholar

54 Wurtz, A., Exposition Universelle de Vienne 1873, 170.Google Scholar

55 Coupier, T., ‘Du rouge de toluidine’, Moniteur Scientifique (1865), 7, 763.Google Scholar

56 Rosenstiehl, A., ‘Bericht über Coupier's vorstehender Aufsatz’, Dingler's polytechnisches Journal (1866), 181, 389–96.Google Scholar

57 Zulkowsky, K., ‘Chemische Industrie – I. Die Producte der Theerfarben-Industrie auf der Pariser Weltausstellung’, in Beobachtungen über die Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Industrie und des gewerblichen Unterrichtes, Vienna, 1868, 66.Google Scholar

58 Chevalier, M. (ed.), Exposition Universelle de 1867 a ParisGoogle Scholar, publiées sous la direction de M. Michel Chevalier, membre de la Commission Impériale. Rapports du jury international. Tome Septième, Groupe V, Classes 44 a 46, Paris, 1868.

59 Pataille, J. (réd.), Annales de la propriété industrielle artistique et littéraire (1869), 15, 123–8 (hereafter Annales).Google Scholar

60 Annales (1870), 16, 254–6.Google Scholar

61 Annales (1866), 12, 312–34Google Scholar; Annales (1869), 15, 135–6.Google Scholar

62 Annales (1866), 12, 305–12Google Scholar; Annales (1869), 15, 128–35.Google Scholar

63 Cayez, P., op. cit. (53) 23.Google Scholar

64 Shinn, T., ‘The genesis of French industrial research 1880–1940’, Social Science Information (1980), 19, 607–40, especially 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar